Tech Executives Agree U.S. Copyright Law is Making a Horrible Mess
September 17, 2012 3:07 PM
comment(s) - last by
30 CEOs and other top executives in a new report sound off about how nonsensical copyright law is progress
Whether you're a college student, an engineer, or an executive in charge of a huge tech company, there's a growing consensus that U.S. patent and copyright law is badly out of touch with reality.
law school professor
, published in the
University of Wisconsin Law Review
, saw the lawyer detail 30 interviews with CEOs and other high-level executives in the tech industry. It found overwhelming evidence that content holders have created a messy state of affairs for U.S. copyright law; a mess which is both stymying technology, and hurting the content holders themselves.
I. Consensus: Copyright Law in the U.S. is Out of Control
, "Many innovators working on revolutionary technologies and many venture capitalists told me that copyright law has harmed innovation in the music industry. [I]ndustry leaders made clear to me that there are numerous innovations that failed to reach the market because of copyright laws"
He sees companies like Napster --which started on the principle of a radical new technology, but eventually fell under a flurry of litigation from the music industry -- as a failed opportunity for both parties. He comments that "a lot of innovators were scared away from trying to work with the record labels."
The DMCA and other punitive laws have plagued the tech industry.
[Image Source: Error Access Denied]
After the lawsuits, Napster flipped hands
before eventually winding up -- in greatly diminished form -- as a property of current owner Rhapsody.
II. Win-Win Services Delayed by Legal Mess
The author blames punitive litigation for delaying services like Pandora Media Inc.'s (
) and Spotify's internet radio offerings.
In their rush to fight the future content creators stifled win-win technologies like internet radio.
[Image Source: Pandora]
On the topic of
Orwellian "Stop Online Piracy Act"
) in the House and "PROTECT IP Act" (PIPA) (
) in the Senate, he writes, "The laws presented examples of copyright holders trying to expand the law to protect themselves at the expense of everybody else. We saw that the technology and internet communities have muscles to flex. Innovation needs to be part of the equation. I wrote this article to help put innovation at the forefront of the debate."
Indeed, the government is now having to answer tough questions regarding the abuse of the
Digital Millennium Copyright Act
(DMCA) [PDF] (see
of the U.S. Code) to take down multiple legitimate sites at the request of the
Recording Industry Association of America
The message seems clear -- by pushing punitive legislation like the DMCA, SOPA, and PIPA; and by supporting equally punitive/nonsensical lawsuits against individual file-sharers
seeking hundreds of thousands of dollars in damages
-- content holders are hurting their own opportunity to profit by trying to fight technological progress.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
Copyright Law is a recent phenomenon...NOT (credit to Borat)
9/19/2012 9:57:51 AM
The writer comes off as writing as though copyright is a recent phenomenon, even of the 20th century, when in fact it isn't. It's been around as long as our constitution has. Copyright is crucial to many artists. It's insurance that their hard work and source of income won't be stolen from them. Many people might think its only whether Britney Spears can choose between a Gulfstream IV and a Gulfstream V, but in reality, copyright royalties can be the source of a meal or the ability to pay rent for a month for many struggling artists.
And since its been around for so long, that means that the law needs to be modified from time to time. Though many think of it most notably happening when VHS and Betamax came out, it also means it should be codified for the internet.
"I'd be pissed too, but you didn't have to go all Minority Report on his ass!" -- Jon Stewart on police raiding Gizmodo editor Jason Chen's home
U.S. Federal Court: $675,000 Fine to Grad Student Pirate's 30 Songs is "Fair"
August 24, 2012, 8:08 PM
Guilty Until Proven Innocent: U.S. House Proposes Internet Inquisition, Pt. I
November 16, 2011, 6:50 PM
Napster Relaunches, Again
May 18, 2009, 11:33 AM
Best Buy to Purchase Napster
September 15, 2008, 2:57 PM
Twitter Senior VP: "Diversity is Important, But We Can’t Lower the Bar"
November 9, 2015, 9:59 AM
CNN Resorts to Internet Censorship to Promote Clinton Over Senator Sanders
October 15, 2015, 2:47 PM
Breaking Bad: How to Crash Google's Chrome Browser With Just 8 Characters
September 23, 2015, 11:08 AM
Quick Note: Amazon UK Offers £10 Back on Any Order £50 or Over
August 3, 2015, 12:05 PM
Editorial: Reddit Allows Itself to be Hijacked as a Hate Platform For Racist Bigots
July 21, 2015, 6:32 PM
Mozilla and Facebook to Adobe: It's Time to Kill Flash
July 20, 2015, 6:30 PM
Most Popular Articles
Say Goodbye to Data Plans - Sprint and T-Mobile offer Unlimited Data
August 22, 2016, 6:12 AM
Lenovo vs. Asus vs. HP - Best Laptop Under $500.00
August 19, 2016, 4:00 AM
Get Ready to wait in line – iPhone 7 due September.
August 18, 2016, 7:15 AM
5 Healthy and Creative ways to add Fiber to your Diet By Monique C. Bethell, Ph.D.
August 18, 2016, 7:43 AM
Uber - Everyone's Autonomous Car Driver?
August 20, 2016, 6:01 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Coming Soon - Drones and Airports
Aug 24, 2016, 12:40 PM
SolarCity’s Gigafactory: A Milesone in Emerging Technology by Lily Emamian - 15 August 2016
Aug 15, 2016, 6:30 AM
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information