Tech Executives Agree U.S. Copyright Law is Making a Horrible Mess
September 17, 2012 3:07 PM
comment(s) - last by
30 CEOs and other top executives in a new report sound off about how nonsensical copyright law is progress
Whether you're a college student, an engineer, or an executive in charge of a huge tech company, there's a growing consensus that U.S. patent and copyright law is badly out of touch with reality.
law school professor
, published in the
University of Wisconsin Law Review
, saw the lawyer detail 30 interviews with CEOs and other high-level executives in the tech industry. It found overwhelming evidence that content holders have created a messy state of affairs for U.S. copyright law; a mess which is both stymying technology, and hurting the content holders themselves.
I. Consensus: Copyright Law in the U.S. is Out of Control
, "Many innovators working on revolutionary technologies and many venture capitalists told me that copyright law has harmed innovation in the music industry. [I]ndustry leaders made clear to me that there are numerous innovations that failed to reach the market because of copyright laws"
He sees companies like Napster --which started on the principle of a radical new technology, but eventually fell under a flurry of litigation from the music industry -- as a failed opportunity for both parties. He comments that "a lot of innovators were scared away from trying to work with the record labels."
The DMCA and other punitive laws have plagued the tech industry.
[Image Source: Error Access Denied]
After the lawsuits, Napster flipped hands
before eventually winding up -- in greatly diminished form -- as a property of current owner Rhapsody.
II. Win-Win Services Delayed by Legal Mess
The author blames punitive litigation for delaying services like Pandora Media Inc.'s (
) and Spotify's internet radio offerings.
In their rush to fight the future content creators stifled win-win technologies like internet radio.
[Image Source: Pandora]
On the topic of
Orwellian "Stop Online Piracy Act"
) in the House and "PROTECT IP Act" (PIPA) (
) in the Senate, he writes, "The laws presented examples of copyright holders trying to expand the law to protect themselves at the expense of everybody else. We saw that the technology and internet communities have muscles to flex. Innovation needs to be part of the equation. I wrote this article to help put innovation at the forefront of the debate."
Indeed, the government is now having to answer tough questions regarding the abuse of the
Digital Millennium Copyright Act
(DMCA) [PDF] (see
of the U.S. Code) to take down multiple legitimate sites at the request of the
Recording Industry Association of America
The message seems clear -- by pushing punitive legislation like the DMCA, SOPA, and PIPA; and by supporting equally punitive/nonsensical lawsuits against individual file-sharers
seeking hundreds of thousands of dollars in damages
-- content holders are hurting their own opportunity to profit by trying to fight technological progress.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Liberals trying to force their beliefs on the 99%
9/17/2012 6:49:41 PM
That's not a problem. The reworded song is copyrighted 1980 and when it was produced, assuming everything happened legitimatly in the music business, royalties where paid for the cover of the 1970s song. If it's from the same author, royalties don't even come into effect, and yes the work would still be 1980 copyright however the original will reach public domain in 2050 assuming the author died in 2000.
Though if your country has a longer term of experation you might need to wait longer. That i don't know.
In any case, 28 years is still too long. It might've been long in ye olde days where it took weeks just to travel to another city, but today it's ages. 28 years ago:
- dropping a mobile phone on your foot broke your foot.
- 64kb was enough for everybody
- Saddam hussein was our friend
- no space shuttle had ever exploded
- gas was about $1,20 a gallon and dropping
- interest rates where at 9% and rising. Today's $500 billion @ 0% on interest on national debt would be $1,5 trillion.
- Though that $500 billion would only be $255,5 billion.
I say 10 years, no exceptions, and no extentions what so ever. If we leave the system open to extention within a couple of years they'll extend the extensions to right back where we started. After that it's anchored in the constitution in a copyright amendment so nobody will dare change it again.
If you can't find a way to capitalize on your invention in a decade, you don't deserve to. A decade is a long time.
“We do believe we have a moral responsibility to keep porn off the iPhone.” -- Steve Jobs
U.S. Federal Court: $675,000 Fine to Grad Student Pirate's 30 Songs is "Fair"
August 24, 2012, 8:08 PM
Guilty Until Proven Innocent: U.S. House Proposes Internet Inquisition, Pt. I
November 16, 2011, 6:50 PM
Napster Relaunches, Again
May 18, 2009, 11:33 AM
Best Buy to Purchase Napster
September 15, 2008, 2:57 PM
Twitter Senior VP: "Diversity is Important, But We Can’t Lower the Bar"
November 9, 2015, 9:59 AM
CNN Resorts to Internet Censorship to Promote Clinton Over Senator Sanders
October 15, 2015, 2:47 PM
Breaking Bad: How to Crash Google's Chrome Browser With Just 8 Characters
September 23, 2015, 11:08 AM
Quick Note: Amazon UK Offers £10 Back on Any Order £50 or Over
August 3, 2015, 12:05 PM
Editorial: Reddit Allows Itself to be Hijacked as a Hate Platform For Racist Bigots
July 21, 2015, 6:32 PM
Mozilla and Facebook to Adobe: It's Time to Kill Flash
July 20, 2015, 6:30 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information