Print 23 comment(s) - last by TheLiberalTrut.. on Jun 14 at 8:44 AM

Perpendicular, ultra fast and now spacious too

Seagate this week unveiled its new Cheetah 15K.5 (PDF), the world's fastest hard drive. The new drive is a 300GB beast, which at first doesn't seem like very impressive in terms of specifications. However, this drive spins at a blistering 15,000 RPM and at that speed, no other line of hard drive is faster.

How Seagate achieves the Cheetah's fast rotation speeds is by using platters that are actually smaller than those in standard desktop hard drives. The drives are physically similar, at 3.5-inches like most desktop hard drives, but inside the platters are small, allowing the fluid-bearing motor to whip those discs around at record speeds. The problem in the past with this is that Cheetah drives have been quite limited in size. You could use them for speed-focused applications and scenarios, but if you wanted space, you were out of luck unless more drives were purchased -- and these drives don't come cheap.

With the new Cheetah 15K.5, Seagate has moved the Cheetah family to perpendicular recording for the first time. This allows Seagate to pack more bits in less area, achieving greater capacities. The new line comes in 73GB, 146GB and 300GB capacities.  The following are some of the Cheetah 15K.5's specifications:
  • Max capacity: 300GB
  • Seek Time, Read/Write (average, msec.): 3.5/4.0
  • Transfer Rate, Sustained (MB/sec.): Up to 125MB/sec
  • Reliability rating at full 24x7 Operation (AFR), chance of failure: 0.62%
  • Non-recoverable Read errors per bits read: 1 sector per 10^16
  • Power consumption SCSI (Watts at idle): 12.5w (300GB), 9.6w (146GB), 8.1w (73GB)
  • Interface options: Ultra320 SCSI, 3Gbit/sec. SAS, 4Gbit/sec. Fibre Channel
  • Warranty (years): 5
Seagate's Cheetah family of drives is also known to have very high reliability ratings. Seagate usually labels them as having over 1.5 million hours of solid operation before failure, or MTBF (mean time before failure).

In related Seagate news, the company finished its acquisition of long-time competitor Maxtor, and in fact plans to lay-off as much as 90% of all Maxtor employees. The news caused a major stir and many are concerned about the future of employment for Americans. The company this week also unveiled full-time/full-disc encryption technology for its notebook drives, providing greater security for traveling users.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By Brainonska511 on 6/8/2006 8:18:56 PM , Rating: 2
How come these drives only come in SCSI interfaces? Why not just slap on a SATA controller so we can easily use them in non-server PCs.

RE: Question
By phatboye on 6/8/2006 8:22:57 PM , Rating: 2
it's all about the money baby

RE: Question
By phatboye on 6/8/2006 8:26:10 PM , Rating: 2
if they were to make 15k rpm sata HD's no one would pay the premium for SCSI.

RE: Question
By RamboZZo on 6/9/2006 11:56:40 AM , Rating: 2
It has nothing to do with SCSI premiums. These drives are so expensive that even at an enthusiast level I highly doubt sales would even make a dent for seagate to bother making a SATA version. Its optimized and designed as an enterprise level drive and if you want one for your PC you might as well just splurge for the SCSI controller anyway. Beisdes, the good thing about a SCSI card is its a long term investment. Its one of the few PC components you'll never need to upgrade for years. Even a 7 year old Ultra 160 card can still move these drives just fine.

RE: Question
By cnimativ on 6/8/2006 8:32:27 PM , Rating: 1
Because SATA doesnt provide the RAS features that SAS/SCSI/FC standards have?

This is an enterprise/workstation level HDD, not your typical gaming enthusiast drive. Stay with Raptor as you probably won't need the extra I/O.

And if you want true performance, there are tons of SAS/SATA2 controllers out there for less than $1000. Extremely cheap for the performance if you have enough greens to buy FX/EE and quad SLi. HDD is usually system bottleneck anyway.

RE: Question
By Cybercat on 6/9/2006 12:56:19 AM , Rating: 2
Be that as it may, that doesn't mean some of this tech can't be used for a consumer version though. I say it's high-time Western Digital had some Raptor competition.

Even if they lowered it to 10k and something like 200GB (and obviously ax the enterprise features) that would still be extremely compelling.

RE: Question
By RMSistight on 6/8/2006 8:35:45 PM , Rating: 3
You took the words out of my mouth.

Very Expensive Platters
By AkaiRo on 6/8/2006 11:02:22 PM , Rating: 2
As the article says (and what seems to be an oddity to most) is the fact that, indeed, these 15Krpm drives are actually 2.5" platters housed in larger shells. The SAS SFF drives that are coming onto the market are really just these same platters housed in a different form factor.

Such densities on a small platter costs more which pretty much precludes mass market appeal. But that's OK because those of us who have to buy drives for servers are more than happy to use them when the project/application demands it.

But again, this is great news as that means it will be about a year until the 300GB SAS SFF drives make an appearance. Now if they can introduce them with the long-promised dual ported interfaces then life will truly be great.

"It seems as though my state-funded math degree has failed me. Let the lashings commence." -- DailyTech Editor-in-Chief Kristopher Kubicki
Related Articles
Seagate to Cut Maxtor in Half
May 31, 2006, 5:27 PM

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
Snapchat’s New Sunglasses are a Spectacle – No Pun Intended
September 24, 2016, 9:02 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki