backtop


Print 48 comment(s) - last by madtruths.. on Sep 16 at 7:31 PM

House says yes to 5 more years of Americans surrendering their freedom in exchange for temporary safety

There seems to be a never-ending battle to spy on Americans in the name of "fighting terrorism" in the United States.  This week the U.S. House voted 301-118 to pass the FISA Amendments Act Reauthorization Act of 2012 (H.R. 5949).  The bipartisan-backed bill will give the government a blank check for 5 more years of warrantless wiretaps.

I. How Did We Get Here?

The FISA mess, like many in the government is a story of what seemed like a good idea being perverted to accomplish the exact thing that it was original intended to prevent -- non-transparent and unaccountable wiretapping.

The FISA was designed to eliminate Fourth Amendment violations, and was put in place in the wake of accusations that President Richard Nixon had used wiretaps to spy on political rivals.  The act only allowed for warrantless wiretaps if one of the parties was "reasonably believed" to be outside the U.S.

While well intentioned, perhaps the FISA left open the door to abuse by putting domestic surveillance mechanisms in place.  While the bill criminalized abuse, with a penalty of up to five years in jail, it has been difficult to prove abuse allegations against ranking federal officials. 

But for its flaws FISA did offer some protections for a while.  Then came the PATRIOT Act of 2001, which dramatically expanded warrantless wiretaps, and the "Protect America Act" of 2007 (Pub.L. 110-55S. 1927).

II. Both Romney and Obama Support Spying on Citizens

As with many kind of domestic spying over the last decade, usage went up and accountability went down.  It's hard to say exactly what the results are -- because the public isn't privileged with that information.

But from past warrantless surveillance program reviews, one could safely assume that the program was often used for its intended purpose (fighting terrorism) -- but also often abused in a variety of ways.

William Binney, a codebreaker for the U.S. National Security Agency -- one of the chief wiretapping intelligence agencies -- quit his post in 2001 when he began to witness abuse; U.S. citizens being illegitimately snooped on.

[Image Source: Djibnet]

He commented in a speech at this year's Defcon hacker conference, "NSA's charter was to do foreign intelligence, and I was with that all the way.  But then they took those systems that I built and they turned them on you, and I'm sorry about that."

Both President Obama and former Mass. Governor and Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney are both of the same mind when it comes to this provision and others which will likely lead to spying on American citizens -- they love them.  Both men have vocally supported the extension to the warrantless wiretaps and in support of other kinds of spying, arguing that the need for safety outweighs Americans' need for certain freedoms like privacy.

With such sweeping bipartisan support, the spying on American citizens and erosion liberties is likely to continue to be enjoyed and be advanced in years to come, assuming there is not a radical change in party leadership or some other radical shift in the American political atmosphere.

Source: GOP



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Yeah, right
By polishvendetta on 9/14/2012 11:39:38 AM , Rating: 2
Honestly I think most of the American government brings it on them selves these days and makes the United States a target.

People think that because America is a world power we should be meddling and influencing emerging countries. We take that heavy handed "father knows best" approach even though we are a very young country. That pisses a lot of people off, including me as one of its citizens.

Its great to encourage growth and provide aid to people who need it, but when we do it so unevenly there are countries that are going to feel jilted and treated unfairly.

The organizations that want to cause damage to the US do so because they think America is over reaching. Terrorists dont hate fredom unlike George W Bush said. They just want to be free to live their lives how they see fit.

Who are we, as a country who has been around for only 400 years, to tell people and contries whos history in their land stretches several thousand, they they arent living right?


RE: Yeah, right
By PaFromFL on 9/15/2012 10:07:53 AM , Rating: 2
Exactly! We didn't have these problems before we began meddling in the affairs of other countries. The terrorists don't attack other countries that richer and freer than the US (e.g. Switzerland) because those countries mind their own business. And the terrorists had problems meeting their recruiting quotas until we invaded the Middle East. And our leaders are delighted to obtain power for themselves and billions for their buddies through the use of a little fear mongering. And our religious right is ecstatic that they can finally restart religious wars that will fill their empty pews and coffers.

US citizens have been brainwashed to believe that the "terrorists" attacked us for no good reason. Before 9/11, our lopsided foreign policies supported much suffering and death in the Middle East. The enemies that we created were ignored politically, were not strong enough to fight back conventionally, and eventually resorted to terrorist tactics as a last resort. When mothers are willing to blow themselves up to hurt you (or Buddhist monks set themselves on fire when we meddled in Vietnam), maybe it's time admit that you are not smart enough or honest enough to meddle in the affairs of other countries.


"Nowadays you can buy a CPU cheaper than the CPU fan." -- Unnamed AMD executive














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki