TSA Agents Demand Passengers Surrender Their Drinks for Screening
September 5, 2012 12:29 PM
comment(s) - last by
Travelers, brace yourselves for the latest indignity
Thinking about flying? Well, in addition to
and the risk that your privates
may be photographed and stored
Transportation Safety Administration
screeners, travelers now have one more woe to add to their litany of complaints.
TSA agents at the Columbus, Ohio Airport have been subjecting travelers to random seizures/inspections of their drinks at the gate to "check for explosives".
Of course, these drinks all were presumably were sold by the airport vendors, as any drink-size liquid containers are supposed to be seized by the bag screeners at the security checkpoint -- a policy that has been in place since 2006. So at first blush it's somewhat unclear exactly why the TSA agents felt it necessary to screen passengers' Starbucks and soft drinks.
The incident has been leaked onto YouTube (of course):
Ryan Mauro, a national security analyst, told the
, "They're worried someone could bring an ingredient past security and then mix it with a drink that turns into something else - a poison or something else."
Airport screeners test passenger's Starbucks coffee to make sure he isn't a terrorist.
[Image Source: YouTube]
In June, the U.S. reportedly thwarted an attempt to blow up an airliner by a Yemen-trained, Norwegian citizen who was a member of the militant fundamentalist Islamic group al Qaeda. Despite the potential terrorist's plot failing, national security officials are reportedly alarmed about the fact that his spotless record and lack of inclusion
on no-fly lists
could have allowed him to escape scrutiny, were it not for the tips.
In a statement the TSA confirmed it might now be seizing people's drinks as a precautionary measure, commenting, "TSA employs multiple layers of security throughout the airport where passengers may be randomly selected for additional screening. One measure may include testing liquids that are in a passenger's possession."
Is that a coconut water or a bomb? Let's find out. [Image Source: YouTube]
TSA agents "examine" the beverages using a special security screen, which appears to involve taking a small dropper or swab sample of the beverage, then testing it on a slide with some sort of reagent mix.
Some say that the policy goes to far, though. The person who captured the incident on video told the
I couldn't help but notice the two TSA women that were 'testing' any and all liquids that people had in their hands. Now remember that this is inside the terminal, well beyond the security check and purchased inside the terminal ... just people waiting to get on the plane.
My wife and son came back from a coffee shop just around the corner, then we were approached. I asked them what they were doing. One of the TSA ladies said that they were checking for explosive chemicals (as we are drinking them). I said 'really..inside the terminal? You have got to be kidding me.'
I asked them if they wanted to swab us all. She responded with something like, yes sometimes we need to do that. I then asked if she wanted a urine sample.
The TSA is way out of control. I understand that my ranting to one of these $11.00 per hour TSA goons probably does nothing, but you have to say something. Whats next...perhaps the TSA will come to your home prior to your drive to the airport? The police state of the U.S. is OUT OF CONTROL!
Indeed, as the
list of indignities grows
at a pace proportional to the would-be terrorists' increasingly imaginative plots, one has to wonder where the line must be drawn.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Not about chemicals
9/9/2012 2:48:33 AM
Fuck you mocyd. You do not know what you are talking about. If I buy a drink after going through security, it is the airports fault. TSA should be testing all contents that a company is selling after security checks. It is stupid to check all people's possessions after security checks have been done. If TSA is not willing to test the contents of the company's products before the customer buys it in the airport after security checks, then TSA does not have a right to test my drink or food.
Drink or food testing after going through security check is just too redundant which will hurt me and everybody else that have to travel by air. TSA needs to check every company's products before being sold to the customer to do security properly. I am not OK if TSA swab my drink or food because I am a germaphobe. If they do not use a new clean swab, I am dumping the drink and smashing the food in their face. Then buy a new drink and billing TSA for their stupid security checks after security checks.
One of the reasons why I did not go to my cousin's wedding last month is because of the extra security TSA has added. Flying by air is getting disgusting because the redundant security. The full body scan is for show and not for tell. Engineers have said that the full body scan is not accurate. Heck the machine did not alarmed when Adam Savage, one of the host of Discovery's Mythbusters, had a long 19 inch razor blade on him. This means the full body scan does not work. Sure TSA will not report what the full body scanner alarmed, but with out telling those results means it is for show and not for tell or it does not work.
Something else to think about what is good for the first security checks if the next security check is swabbing a drink or food. Also something to think about if TSA have to test drinks and food after buying from a reputable company after going through the security check, what is TSA saying about the reputable company. To me, I think TSA distrust the reputable companies that are after the security check. TSA distrusting American made companies like McDonald's, Pizza Hut, Starbucks and Subway shows that TSA security just sucks or they fear that food companies will be poisoning the TSA agents.
"This is about the Internet. Everything on the Internet is encrypted. This is not a BlackBerry-only issue. If they can't deal with the Internet, they should shut it off." -- RIM co-CEO Michael Lazaridis
New Homeland Security Scanners Could Lead to More Detainments
July 11, 2012, 5:50 PM
DHS Proposes Secret Watchlist Database, Privacy Groups Protest
August 10, 2011, 4:26 PM
TSA Patdown Leaves 6-Year Old in Tears, Gov't Defends Actions
April 14, 2011, 10:01 AM
Senate Moves to Criminalize Sharing of Body Scanner Pics
February 10, 2011, 9:02 AM
Commercial Drones to Get Privacy Guidelines Via Executive Order
July 25, 2014, 5:34 PM
Pentagon's Priciest Project, F-35, Misses International Debut
July 25, 2014, 10:18 AM
Temple University Researchers Hit the Delete Button on HIV, Remove it from Human Cells
July 22, 2014, 7:39 AM
Airbus Shows Off All-Electric E-Fan 2.0 Airplane, Plans Production in 2017
July 21, 2014, 9:29 AM
Buzz Aldrin Says First Astronauts to Set Foot on Mars Should Never Return Home
July 9, 2014, 9:46 AM
Women May Soon Be Able to Control Their Fertility via Remote Control
July 7, 2014, 10:14 AM
Most Popular Articles
Kindle Fire Phone Review Roundup -- A Solid "Meh"
July 23, 2014, 2:09 PM
Ford Details ’15 F-150’s 325hp, 2.7L EcoBoost V6; Demonstrates 732-lb Weight Loss
July 22, 2014, 6:55 PM
Windows 9 Will Merge Windows, Windows Phone, Windows RT in 2015
July 23, 2014, 3:33 PM
Comcast Memo: Harassing Customers During Retention Calls Actually IS Our Policy
July 22, 2014, 5:19 PM
Sony's Xperia Z3 Gets Detailed in Leaked Photos
July 25, 2014, 2:30 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Space Terrorism is a Looming Threat For the United States
Apr 23, 2014, 7:47 PM
Facebook Aims to Provide Internet to "Every Person in the World" with Drones, Satellites
Apr 1, 2014, 10:20 AM
Retail Mobile Sites Experience Outages in Light of Simplexity's Bankruptcy
Mar 14, 2014, 8:48 AM
Tesla vs. BMW: Who Has the Safer EV?
Feb 1, 2014, 2:56 PM
Justice Leaks Details of Next HTC One Two Flagship Phone
Dec 5, 2013, 4:04 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information