Sources: YouTube, Daily Mail
quote: No, because if that were true, we'd see it manifest in countries where the security is not as draconian (the same companies that operate here also operate there).
quote: It's a clumsy attempt
quote: In my argument- I actually suggested a practical alternative to critiquing drink testing- challenging the no fly lists.
quote: Before the September 11, 2001 attacks, airport screening was provided by private companies which were contracted with the airline or airport.
quote: Trying to distract form an issue by saying "look over there!" is not a valid form of argument; you are simply sidestepping the case under discussion.
quote: And was it liquid vendor sold drinks that caused 9/11? No, it was physical people with physical box cutters who physically controlled the planes to fly into things. A very different security issue than liquids sold by security screened vendors behind security gates!
quote: Given that it is fairly easy to create explosives from household cleaning products (that are likely located at airports by the vendors themselves, along with other staff), it is not inconceivable that a maniac might try to assemble one after they've passed the gate, concealed in regular containers.
quote: We live in a day where a person will gun down several people and shoot themselves in the head after they're done. There's no telling what a crazy person might try next, let alone a terrorist.
quote: Yup even with terrorist trying to blow up planes
quote: "An armed society is a polite society.
quote: by croc on September 6, 2012 at 1:34 AMI might point out that R.A.H. was a writer of science-fiction, not a philosopher, not a statesman...As long as you keep your 'heat' off of any transportation that I am on, we're cool. And please don't even THINK about bringing it into my house, my city, my country... As a matter of fact, just stay away. We don't need your kind around here.
quote: Demonstrate specifics to me. If you're talking about a country where security is already undermined for other reasons (ie- it doesn't make sense to enhance security at the gate because the airfield is accessible and unprotected), or it's not a country as threatened by terrorism as the US, then you don't really have a point.
quote: So you prefer no attempt?