Print 74 comment(s) - last by Aloonatic.. on Sep 6 at 3:11 AM

Apple is looking to pile on with a Galaxy S III ban, despite that phone not being involved in the case.
South Korean analyst: Samsung "may lack in innovation, but right now, no one can beat Samsung in playing catch-up"

The crippling U.S. patent court $1.05B USD copyright infringement verdict against the world's largest smartphone maker, Samsung Electronics Comp., Ltd. (KSC:005930), is far from over.  

I. Ban 'Em All

Apple, Inc. (AAPL) is pushing the San Jose, Calif. U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California to ban all currently on-sale products that were found to infringe in the case plus another couple products not listed in the case, which include Samsung's flagship Galaxy S III smartphone.  

Apple previously tried to ban the Galaxy S III, but failed.  I predicted it would now try to lump in such a ban on the wings of its massive victory, and indeed it did.
If Apple's request is granted, Samsung would essentially be banned from selling any smartphone other than its Focus 2 Windows Phone and its non-Android quasi-smartphones.

In Samsung's home nation of South Korea, shock is in the air.  Days before the U.S. verdict a Korean court had ruled that both companies had infringed on each others' work.  That verdict stood in stark contrast to the American jurors, who decided that Samsung stole a plethora of technologies and designs from Apple, and that Apple stole nothing from Samsung.

Questions of bias persist -- at least one of the jurors had a family member who held a large quantity of Apple stock, according to past reports -- but South Korean analysts fear that there may be a hint of truth in the ruling. They fear that perhaps their culture relies a bit too much on imitation when looking to conquer a new field.  But many of the critics also express feelings of pride in the company.  Even if Apple does "kick it out" of the U.S. market, what Samsung did -- beating Apple in an unregulated market battle -- was impressive.

Comments James Song, KDB Daewoo Securities' Samsung-centric analyst, in an interview with The New York Times, "The ruling makes us reconsider the brand value of Samsung because it depicts Samsung as a copycat.  But a copycat or not, what Samsung has done with its smartphones was a brilliant move.  Look what has happened to companies like Nokia, Motorola and BlackBerry, which didn't do as Samsung did.  Samsung may lack in innovation, but right now, no one can beat Samsung in playing catch-up."

Indeed -- outside of Samsung, nearly ever phonemaker that isn't named "Apple" is in bad financial trouble.  Google Inc.'s (GOOG) Motorola and Taiwan's HTC Corp. (TPE:2498) are both posting disappointing earnings and shrinking market share.  Research in Motion, Ltd. (TSE:RIM) is creeping ever closer to a breakup liquidation/fire sale.  And Nokia Oyj. (HEX:NOK1V) is requiring deep financial support from Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) to stay afloat.

But JoongAng Ilbo, a local newspaper, takes a more cynical bent, commenting in an editorial, "Copying and clever upgrading are no longer viable.  Samsung must reinvent itself as a first-mover, despite the huge risks involved in acting as a pioneer, if it hopes to beat the competition."

II. Can Samsung Stay Ahead of Apple?

South Korean analysts acknowledge that Samsung's phones are "similar" to Apple's and that it arrived cautiously to the smartphone market, versus some other early adopters, such as RIM and Nokia, who plunged in headfirst.  But they point out that for the similarities, Samsung established a unique look for its products, made them cheaper than Apple's, and endowed them with arguably superior hardware.

The company's expertise in display and chip-making gave it a key advantage, when it eventually did elect for a full-on smartphone push.

Anthony Michell, author of “Samsung Electronics and the Struggle for Leadership of the Electronics Industry", tells The NYT, "Koreans do things quicker than almost anyone.  Samsung Electronics and the Struggle for Leadership of the Electronics Industry.  This allows them to change models, go from design to production faster than anyone at the present time. Korean companies continually set themselves challenges, like the challenge to overtake Sony in terms of brand value in the past."

Some say its legacy of rapid adaptation will allow it to survive Apple's patent assault.

Samsung smartphones
Some say despite the pending bans, Samsung may be able to stay ahead of Apple.
[Image Source: Reuters]

Even with Apple seeking to ban all its U.S. Android smartphone sales, Samsung is racing to modify its operating system to remove features -- such as "rubber-band" graphical flourishes that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office granted Apple exclusive rights to animate in a mobile user interface setting.

If Samsung is able to remove the features, the ban could be reduced from months to days or weeks.

Some analysts are convinced that Apple will actually fall farther behind Samsung in U.S. sales in Q3, despite the damage to its image and potential bans.  Comments Kevin Lee, an analyst at Korea Investment and Securities, "The patent ruling and Samsung’s copycat image will have a negative impact on Samsung’s sales of cellphones and other products.  But Samsung will further widen the gap with Apple in the third quarter, though not as much as expected before the ruling."

And, of course, Samsung also has an appeal of Apple's court win in the U.S. federal court pipeline too -- so it potentially could undo or mar Apple's greatest legal triumph somewhere in the near future.

Source: The New York Times

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Good luck Apple...
By retrospooty on 9/4/2012 2:21:05 PM , Rating: 2
Well, developing apps for a larger market makes more money. Obviously in smartphones, Apple had that crown for the past 5 years. That is changing. Eventually, developers will have to go where the majority platform is. Furthermore, you act as if there is a huge gap. Most "AAA" apps are already on both platforms. It's not like a huge shift is needed. Right now, Apple has an advantage with app/dev support, but not an immense one.

"I thought the party line around here was that Apple didn't innovate."

I never said that. They do drive progress. The initial 2007 iPhone release was a HUGE innovation on the OS front. It changed everything. Since then... not so much innovation. Not any that I can think of. Appl

RE: Good luck Apple...
By retrospooty on 9/4/2012 2:24:08 PM , Rating: 2
Meant to add at the end... Apple has not been making any progress for the past few years. The biggest things that come to mind are the high res screens, and the purchase of Siri... Well, on the Android platform, you can buy phones with larger higher res screens and Google Now easily trumps Siri in speed and funtionality. But, you already know that. You just act as if you dont.

RE: Good luck Apple...
By Tony Swash on 9/4/12, Rating: -1
RE: Good luck Apple...
By retrospooty on 9/4/2012 3:07:52 PM , Rating: 1
"But that's just not true is it. Developers don't follow market share, they follow money, market share is only of interest to developers if it translates into greater sales and greater revenues. Android's greater market share has not translated in to greater revenues for developers. "

Of course they follow the money. What part of this are you not getting, or are you just being obtuse on purpose? From 2007 to 2011, Apple had an advantage. They were ahead of the competition in function and sales. The developer support was there and built up around it. Android last year started to outsell iPhone. Over the next few years what you will see is more and more development favoring Android. Why? Money. At some point as the sales gap grows, as a developer, you will make more $ selling 10 million copies on Android vs. 1 million on IOS. Not the past Tony, nor the present. The future. I think you see this as plainly as the next guy you just arent ready to admit it.

Let me put it this way so your skewed mind can understand (or at least argue the same point).
Android started off behind in features and then caught up and passed Apple. Android started off behind in hardware and then caught up and passed Apple. Android started off behind in sales and then caught up and passed Apple. Over the next few years you will see that Android started off behind in apps/dev support and then caught up and passed Apple. It's not even a large gap to make up. It's just the last little bit of advantage teh iPhone has and its going buh bye.

Have fun clinging to that platform though. I hope it brings you joy.

RE: Good luck Apple...
By momorere on 9/4/2012 3:33:32 PM , Rating: 1
Of course Android users are glued to the rear view mirror. We are simply waving bye bye to crApple as they become smaller and further behind and even more irrelevant.

"This is about the Internet.  Everything on the Internet is encrypted. This is not a BlackBerry-only issue. If they can't deal with the Internet, they should shut it off." -- RIM co-CEO Michael Lazaridis

Latest Headlines
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
The Samsung Galaxy S7
September 14, 2016, 6:00 AM
Apple Watch 2 – Coming September 7th
September 3, 2016, 6:30 AM
Apple says “See you on the 7th.”
September 1, 2016, 6:30 AM

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Laptop or Tablet - Which Do You Prefer?
September 20, 2016, 6:32 AM
Update: Samsung Exchange Program Now in Progress
September 20, 2016, 5:30 AM
Smartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki