Print 44 comment(s) - last by Mels.. on Jun 10 at 8:41 PM

Microsoft told to remove PDF support from Office 2007

Microsoft raised a few eyebrows when it announced that it would natively support the ability to publish documents in Adobe PDF format. Given the popularity of PDF documents (for better or worse) on the web, support from Microsoft was seen by most as a nice addition for Office 2007.

That is all about to change now due to concerns raised by Adobe. The two companies were in talks for the past four months about the inclusion of PDF functionality in Office 2007, but those talks broke down recently. Microsoft contended that it is in the clear as far as native PDF support goes and that its customers have been asking for the features. Adobe countered by saying that Microsoft should either remove the feature altogether or charge customers for it. "The 'save as PDF' feature is the second most popular request we get from customers. Adobe has told the world that PDF is an open format...and (rival) products OpenOffice, WordPerfect Office and Apple (Computer's applications) already support PDF and tout it as a selling feature. Microsoft should be able to support PDF as well," stated Microsoft attorney Dave Heiner.

As a result of the legal bickering, Microsoft will remove not only the save as PDF feature that is available in Office 2007 Beta 2, but also the ability to save documents in Microsoft’s own XPS format. Customers will, however, be able to download both options as free downloads from Microsoft's Office homepage.

Brian Jones, program manager for Microsoft Office, is really disheartened over the whole situation. He recently wrote about his thoughts on the matter in his blog:

This really is one of those cases where you just have to shake your head. Adobe got a lot of goodwill with customers, particularly in government circles, for making PDF available as an open standard. It’s amazing that they would go back on the openness pledge. Unfortunately, the really big losers here are the customers who now have one extra hassle when they deploy Office.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Adobe PDF usage distinctions
By Bonrock on 6/3/2006 4:02:14 AM , Rating: 2
Why else would talks last 4 months and then end with the functionality available only by an Adode provided download?

Based on what I've read in numerous articles today, my understanding is that Microsoft--not Adobe--will provide the PDF functionality as a free add-on download for Office 2007. This is in lieu of including the functionality right out of the box. Nonetheless, it seems that Adobe objects even to the free download approach--this is why Microsoft is saying they expect Adobe to sue them.

By david Canada on 6/3/2006 10:13:55 AM , Rating: 2
Missed that detail....XPS might be argued to be the "extend" play. The irony though is that Microsoft has waited to this late hour to bring on PDF and is arguing for standards. It ought to be possible to more easily add standard file formats etc to Windows services and Office.. recall .zip .mp3 encoding and .pdf needed standalone programs. DVD and Divx became part of a services library.. but then Microsoft was motivated to move in the media direction due to weaknesses there and tried later to foist .wma and .wmv on the public (and gave IPOD an 80% share). I guess Adobe knows all the facts better than I do..

"We are going to continue to work with them to make sure they understand the reality of the Internet.  A lot of these people don't have Ph.Ds, and they don't have a degree in computer science." -- RIM co-CEO Michael Lazaridis

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki