Analysis: Samsung "Copies" Apple's Launcher? A Dubious Claim at Best
August 28, 2012 4:34 PM
comment(s) - last by
Apple was hardly the first to make a Dock/Launcher; if Samsung's Windows 8 launcher "stole", so did Steve Jobs
's Jesus Diaz wrote an intriguing headline "
Samsung Is Copying Apple’s Dock In Their Win 8 Machines Too: Will They Ever Learn?
" Mr. Diaz comments:
I don't know if Samsung is now just taunting Apple or if their user interface "designers" are the same lazy idiots who copied the iPhone icons. In any case, this is getting hilarious. Or pathetic. Or disgusting. Or all of the above.
The premise is admittedly amusing. Is Samsung Electronics Comp., Ltd. (
) really copying a patented and trademarked technology of Apple, Inc.'s (
)? Would it be that foolish after
losing a caustic verdict
in the smartphone space for allegedly lifting Apple features?
Invented the Dock?
The answer is that it depends on your definition of "copied", and what your feelings on
a copy of a copy
are, as a brief history of the dock by
When MacOS landed in 1984 it had no Dock (Launcher). Arthur (1987) and RISC OS 2 (1989) -- operating systems from now-defunct ARM Holdings plc (
parent Acorn Computers
-- were perhaps the first to add the feature, albeit in crude VGA form:
Acorn Computers pioneered the dock. [Image Source: LunDuke]
Later in 1989, Steve Jobs (having left Apple and gone to work at NeXT) pulled a Picasso and "stole" the idea, adding a dock to his NeXTSTEP operating system:
Steve Jobs arrived late to the dock/launcher part in 1989. [Image Source: FutureTG]
OS/2 3.0 (1994) and CDE (1993) offered minor improvements to this familiar theme. But perhaps the most visually striking dock came in 2000 with AmigaOS 3.9's AmiDock, an operating system by German software firm Haage & Partner.
AmiDock was visually the most striking dock yet, made in 2000. [Image Source: LunDuke]
Lo and behold Steve Jobs -- having returned to Apple -- introduced a nearly identical dock to Amiga's in 2001 as part of the new MacOS X:
The Aqua interface (MacOS X beta "Kodiak") added a dock to Apple's operating systems at long last.
[Image Source: Wikimedia Commons]
Eventually that dock would evolve visually to its current form.
OS X Mountain Lion [Image Source: Apple]
But of course, Linux docks (which trace their roots to CDE, etc.) also have been actively evolving as well. Both Ubuntu (Canonical Ltd.) and Gnome Desktop have docks which rival that of OS X, and owe to their rich lineage:
Gnome Desktop (Ubuntu10.10 32-bit) [Image Source: YouTube]
II. Other Considerations : Did Samsung Infringe?
So is Samsung...
Samsung S Launcher [TechMynd]
...late to the dock party? The
piece and other similar pieces attacking Samsung do correctly point out that Apple acquired NeXTSTEP (by proxy its dock legacy and OS patent,
U.S. Patent No. 5,146,556
; filed Feb. 1991). But they seriously overlook the fact that NeXTSTEP and Steve Jobs were not the first to create the dock -- Acorn Computers was.
Now Apple does hold another broad patent --
U.S. Patent No. 7,434,177
-- on the features of OS X, including the dock. That patent was filed in Dec. 1999 and granted in 2008.
Some have interpreted
that to Apple "patenting" the dock/launcher. But in reality, it has made no effort yet to bring such enforcement and seems highly unlikely too; given the shaky historical ground it's on regarding prior art.
The Dock, as you can imagine, is patented.... Its design and functionality is credited to Bas Ording, Donald Lindsay and, drumroll, Steve Jobs.
However, the Dock is just a specific implementation detail in a broad patent regarding OS X. Apple didn't "patent the dock". It patented OS X, which includes a claim to a specific implementation of the dock. Likewise it holds a patent on NeXTSTEP's graphical user interface, and claims to a crude early Dock.
There often is a difference between a patent targeting a specific feature and a broad interface patent covering an entire system/user interface. Often the latter approach leads to a narrowing of claims. Thus this distinction should have been noted in the current coverage.
Also the patent itself contains a central claim:
1. A computer system comprising: a display; a cursor for pointing to a position within said display; a bar rendered on said display and having a plurality of tiles associated therewith; and a processor for varying a size of at least one of said plurality of tiles on said display when said cursor is proximate said bar on said display and for repositioning others of said plurality of tiles along said bar to accommodate the varied size of said one tile.
...which is slowly expanded upon in later claims. The core of the claim is resizing tiles and repositioning the tiles, via moving the others. The Samsung S Launcher does not appear to have either functionality.
Apple did not patent a bar with icons.
It patented specific animations of its task bar (Dock) icons. Samsung does not appear to be overstepping this by simply having a more Dock/Launcher with static icons and a transparent back because that is
not the invention claimed in the in Apple patent
And besides this and the prior art issue, Microsoft Corp. (
a broad cross-licensing pact
with Apple and tends to zealously defend its Windows OEMs. So it would likely not take kindly to Apple suing a Windows 8 device maker for a semi-similar design in a field with plentiful prior art.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Come on Jason, let it go man ....
8/29/2012 10:27:31 AM
Yes, this is a landmark case for software patents and will define the software development and patent landscape in the wake of the final outcome of this case. Many believe it has a high probability of reaching the Supreme Court.
A final outcome for Apple means that very broad software patents are verified as enforceable in the US and large companies can effectively extort, under threat of law, anyone they think infringes on their software patents that refuses to bow down to their licensing terms.
"This is from the DailyTech.com. It's a science website." -- Rush Limbaugh
Doomsday for Samsung in U.S., Jury Rules it Slavishly Infringed Apple's Patents
August 24, 2012, 5:56 PM
Apple and Microsoft's Licensing Pact Spells Out Cloning Taboo
August 14, 2012, 1:24 PM
Tudor Brown Retiring After Propelling ARM to the Top of Mobile Market
November 12, 2011, 1:00 AM
Microsoft Channels LittleBigPlanet and Minecraft With "Project Spark" Beta
December 4, 2013, 9:14 AM
Software Firm Apptricity Receives $50 Million in U.S. Army Piracy Lawsuit
November 29, 2013, 11:42 AM
EA and Tiger Woods Part ways, EA Sports Offers First Look at Next Gen Golf Game
October 29, 2013, 9:27 AM
Quick Note: Trial Versions of iWork, Aperture Updated for Free by Mac App Store
October 24, 2013, 12:53 PM
Crytek "Warface" Opens New Era of AAA In-Browser FPS Gaming
October 22, 2013, 3:00 PM
Microsoft Rolls Out Windows 8.1
October 17, 2013, 11:52 AM
Most Popular Articles
NSA Snares Americans' Porn Viewing Histories in Effort to Target Muslims
December 1, 2013, 9:00 PM
Coalition of 20+ Tech Firms Backs MRAM as Potential DRAM, NAND Replacement
November 29, 2013, 11:59 PM
Dow Chemical to NYC City Council: You Don't Even Know What Styrofoam is!
December 2, 2013, 8:30 PM
Fed Up With Cheating OEMs, Microsoft Trolls Chromebooks in New Ad
November 27, 2013, 4:09 PM
OCZ Goes Bankrupt, SSD Assets are Targeted by Toshiba
December 1, 2013, 9:58 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Global Cyber Espionage Concerns Reveal Growing Cyber Armies
Nov 29, 2013, 11:04 AM
Is The Period Becoming an Expression of Anger?
Nov 26, 2013, 2:02 PM
NSA and Congress -- You Will Never Kill the Constitution, It's an Idea
Nov 10, 2013, 2:00 PM
AT&T Explores $100B+ USD Deal to Acquire Vodafone's European Operations
Nov 4, 2013, 7:34 AM
U.S. Army Developing Cyber, Electronic War Arsenal
Oct 31, 2013, 4:49 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2013 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information