Analysis: Samsung "Copies" Apple's Launcher? A Dubious Claim at Best
August 28, 2012 4:34 PM
comment(s) - last by
Apple was hardly the first to make a Dock/Launcher; if Samsung's Windows 8 launcher "stole", so did Steve Jobs
's Jesus Diaz wrote an intriguing headline "
Samsung Is Copying Apple’s Dock In Their Win 8 Machines Too: Will They Ever Learn?
" Mr. Diaz comments:
I don't know if Samsung is now just taunting Apple or if their user interface "designers" are the same lazy idiots who copied the iPhone icons. In any case, this is getting hilarious. Or pathetic. Or disgusting. Or all of the above.
The premise is admittedly amusing. Is Samsung Electronics Comp., Ltd. (
) really copying a patented and trademarked technology of Apple, Inc.'s (
)? Would it be that foolish after
losing a caustic verdict
in the smartphone space for allegedly lifting Apple features?
Invented the Dock?
The answer is that it depends on your definition of "copied", and what your feelings on
a copy of a copy
are, as a brief history of the dock by
When MacOS landed in 1984 it had no Dock (Launcher). Arthur (1987) and RISC OS 2 (1989) -- operating systems from now-defunct ARM Holdings plc (
parent Acorn Computers
-- were perhaps the first to add the feature, albeit in crude VGA form:
Acorn Computers pioneered the dock. [Image Source: LunDuke]
Later in 1989, Steve Jobs (having left Apple and gone to work at NeXT) pulled a Picasso and "stole" the idea, adding a dock to his NeXTSTEP operating system:
Steve Jobs arrived late to the dock/launcher part in 1989. [Image Source: FutureTG]
OS/2 3.0 (1994) and CDE (1993) offered minor improvements to this familiar theme. But perhaps the most visually striking dock came in 2000 with AmigaOS 3.9's AmiDock, an operating system by German software firm Haage & Partner.
AmiDock was visually the most striking dock yet, made in 2000. [Image Source: LunDuke]
Lo and behold Steve Jobs -- having returned to Apple -- introduced a nearly identical dock to Amiga's in 2001 as part of the new MacOS X:
The Aqua interface (MacOS X beta "Kodiak") added a dock to Apple's operating systems at long last.
[Image Source: Wikimedia Commons]
Eventually that dock would evolve visually to its current form.
OS X Mountain Lion [Image Source: Apple]
But of course, Linux docks (which trace their roots to CDE, etc.) also have been actively evolving as well. Both Ubuntu (Canonical Ltd.) and Gnome Desktop have docks which rival that of OS X, and owe to their rich lineage:
Gnome Desktop (Ubuntu10.10 32-bit) [Image Source: YouTube]
II. Other Considerations : Did Samsung Infringe?
So is Samsung...
Samsung S Launcher [TechMynd]
...late to the dock party? The
piece and other similar pieces attacking Samsung do correctly point out that Apple acquired NeXTSTEP (by proxy its dock legacy and OS patent,
U.S. Patent No. 5,146,556
; filed Feb. 1991). But they seriously overlook the fact that NeXTSTEP and Steve Jobs were not the first to create the dock -- Acorn Computers was.
Now Apple does hold another broad patent --
U.S. Patent No. 7,434,177
-- on the features of OS X, including the dock. That patent was filed in Dec. 1999 and granted in 2008.
Some have interpreted
that to Apple "patenting" the dock/launcher. But in reality, it has made no effort yet to bring such enforcement and seems highly unlikely too; given the shaky historical ground it's on regarding prior art.
The Dock, as you can imagine, is patented.... Its design and functionality is credited to Bas Ording, Donald Lindsay and, drumroll, Steve Jobs.
However, the Dock is just a specific implementation detail in a broad patent regarding OS X. Apple didn't "patent the dock". It patented OS X, which includes a claim to a specific implementation of the dock. Likewise it holds a patent on NeXTSTEP's graphical user interface, and claims to a crude early Dock.
There often is a difference between a patent targeting a specific feature and a broad interface patent covering an entire system/user interface. Often the latter approach leads to a narrowing of claims. Thus this distinction should have been noted in the current coverage.
Also the patent itself contains a central claim:
1. A computer system comprising: a display; a cursor for pointing to a position within said display; a bar rendered on said display and having a plurality of tiles associated therewith; and a processor for varying a size of at least one of said plurality of tiles on said display when said cursor is proximate said bar on said display and for repositioning others of said plurality of tiles along said bar to accommodate the varied size of said one tile.
...which is slowly expanded upon in later claims. The core of the claim is resizing tiles and repositioning the tiles, via moving the others. The Samsung S Launcher does not appear to have either functionality.
Apple did not patent a bar with icons.
It patented specific animations of its task bar (Dock) icons. Samsung does not appear to be overstepping this by simply having a more Dock/Launcher with static icons and a transparent back because that is
not the invention claimed in the in Apple patent
And besides this and the prior art issue, Microsoft Corp. (
a broad cross-licensing pact
with Apple and tends to zealously defend its Windows OEMs. So it would likely not take kindly to Apple suing a Windows 8 device maker for a semi-similar design in a field with plentiful prior art.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: My hope and assumption
8/29/2012 1:49:02 AM
Are we still doing this?
Why not actually read the trial documents?
Of course when I link they get flagged as spam, but it was Judge Grewal who asserted that Samsung submitted the evidence past the May deadline and Judge Koh who upheld his ruling. Blame Samsung's lawyers for submitting late as well as Judge Grewal for ruling.
Also, it wasn't a Sony prototype. It was an Apple designer given the instruction, "Design a Sony styled iPhone". In other words, what do you imagine Sony would make?
That design, ultimately, turned into the iPhone 4. It's no different than the "Microsoft designed iPod":
I hope that link makes it through, because it's funny given it was actually
by Microsoft (I think).
"Mac OS X is like living in a farmhouse in the country with no locks, and Windows is living in a house with bars on the windows in the bad part of town." -- Charlie Miller
Doomsday for Samsung in U.S., Jury Rules it Slavishly Infringed Apple's Patents
August 24, 2012, 5:56 PM
Apple and Microsoft's Licensing Pact Spells Out Cloning Taboo
August 14, 2012, 1:24 PM
Tudor Brown Retiring After Propelling ARM to the Top of Mobile Market
November 12, 2011, 1:00 AM
Quick Note: Whoops, Microsoft Pushed Unwanted Windows 10 to Some Users
October 15, 2015, 9:04 PM
Quick Note: Windows 10 Insider Preview Build 10565 Fixes Boot Camp 6.0 Issues
October 13, 2015, 11:39 AM
Microsoft's HD-500 ("Display Dock"), the Magic Sauce Behind Continuum
October 6, 2015, 5:30 PM
Quick Note: Windows 10 Hits 110 Million Devices, VMs
October 6, 2015, 4:30 PM
Windows 10 on Raspberry Pi, IoT Devices Sees Developer Debut
August 12, 2015, 2:41 PM
Sony Issues Bizzare "Do Not Update" Edict to VAIO PC Owners
August 11, 2015, 9:42 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information