"Appleflation": Apple's Anti-Android Win Could Limit Consumer Choice
August 27, 2012 11:30 AM
comment(s) - last by
(Source: Tech Digest)
Samsung lost an estimated $12B USD in worth from the decision
The weekend has passed, but the shock is still setting in after a potentially precedent setting
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
, which left Samsung Electronics Comp., Ltd. (
) on the hook for approximately $1.05B USD and facing at least temporary bans on most of its product lineup.
I. "Appleflation"? Cupertino Company's Win Stirs Controversy
Apple, Inc. (
quick to gloat
about the victory, whose foundation certainly had some controversial aspects -- such as Apple's ability to
(pinch to zoom) in the context of
multi-touch, Apple's ability to (essentially)
patent the animation of natural phenomena
(the rubber-band animation is a textbook visualization of nature's transient response e.g. see spring), and Apple's ability to "patent a shape" (Apple's attorneys argued that its design patents offered an exclusive right to make
rectangular smartphones with rounded edges
Thus in the aftermath of the trial, much of the controversy has focused not on whether the jury made the right decision, but whether the
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
was crippling the free market with its lacking scrutiny.
Tech mogul Mark Cuban (also a prominent venture capitalist featured on the show
) blasted Apple's decision in a series of Twitter posts,
. He implies that he is going to boycott Apple's products as a result of the lawsuit, and accuses Apple of conspiring to raise prices for electronics customers a term he calls "Appleflation":
[Image Source: Twitter/Neowin]
[Image Source: Twitter]
Google, Inc. (
) makers of the Android operating system also chimed in, writing that the claims in the case "don't relate to the core Android operating system",
The court of appeals will review both infringement and the validity of the patent claims. Most of these don't relate to the core Android operating system, and several are being re-examined by the US Patent Office. The mobile industry is moving fast and all players — including newcomers — are building upon ideas that have been around for decades. We work with our partners to give consumers innovative and affordable products, and we don't want anything to limit that.
While that may sound like Google is throwing Samsung to the wolves, Google is aiming to offer Samsung and other Android OEMs powerful long-term protection, by filing a major new suit against Apple, which seeks to
ban almost Apple's entire product lineup
II. What's Next? Bans, Appeals, Appear Likely
reports that after the ruling South Korea's markets had a wild day of trading, with 1.27 million shares of Samsung stock changing hands, and the company facing its worst single-day value loss in nearly four years. Overall, Samsung shed $12B USD of its $160B USD valuation. Apple, meanwhile added approximately $12B USD to its market cap this morning, reaching $634B USD, and creeping ever closer to Microsoft Corp.'s (
record 1998 valuation
, which adjusted for inflation totals around $850B USD.
The verdict cost Samsung $12B USD in value. [Image Source:
In a statement to
Dow Jones NewsWires
, Samsung complained that the ruling would limit consumer choice, writing:
We will move immediately to file post-verdict motions to overturn this decision in this court and if we are not successful, we will appeal this decision to the Court of Appeals
It is unfortunate that patent law can be manipulated to give one company a monopoly over rectangles with rounded corners or technology that is being improved every day by Samsung and other companies.
In other words, Samsung will first try to sway
Judge Lucy Koh
to reduce the infringement and damages in the trial verdict stage. The jury's ruling is only guidance for the judge's verdict/sentencing in this kind of civil case, although it usually closely resembles the final ruling.
If it cannot sway Judge Koh, it will begrudgingly move up the food chain with its appeal, while it continues to challenge the validity of Apple's broad patents in complaints to the USPTO.
A memo to employees from Samsung's management highlights how the U.S. ruling was much more punitive than rulings in other countries, who largely rejected Apple's design claims (Germany is the only other region to embrace Apple's design claims). Samsung writes:
We initially proposed to negotiate with Apple instead of going to court, as they had been one of our most important customers. However, Apple pressed on with a lawsuit, and we have had little choice but to counter-sue, so that we can protect our company.
The NDCA verdict starkly contrasts decisions made by courts in a number of other countries, such as the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Germany, and Korea, which have previously ruled that we did not copy Apple’s designs. These courts also recognized our arguments concerning our standards patents.
The Korea Times
a senior Samsung Electronics executive as saying; "It’s absolutely the worst scenario for us."
A South Korean patent lawyer involved in the case asserted, "Judge Lucy Koh will make the final ruling in the next few weeks. Samsung will try best to persuade Koh that we didn’t willfully infringe on Apple’s design patents. Samsung, however, is ready to bring the issue to the Supreme Court as the verdict was based on protectionism."
But a Samsung executive appeared more aware of the likely grim reality, remarking, "As far as I know, it’s very rare for the presiding judge to make a decision going against the verdict by jurors."
Thus Samsung's next move is to move the matter to an appeals court, and (likely) to work on emergency software patches to remove features like tap/pinch to zoom and new body designs, to escape product bans.
Unless the Samsung Galaxy S III escapes an ITC ban, Samsung's entire lineup may be temporarily forbidden from sale on the U.S. market.
Apple's next move will be to push for speedy product bans. It will also likely seek to pressure the
U.S. International Trade Commission
ban the Galaxy S III
, not involved in the case, pointing that it has similar features as Samsung's infringing lineup (e.g. pinch to zoom). If Apple can ban the Galaxy S III, it may be able to achieve the unthinkable -- secure a complete ban on the products of America's current top smartphone seller.
Mark Cuban on Twitter
Google via The Verge
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
Just a Thought
8/27/2012 3:56:22 PM
IF Apple hasn't been innovating... as claimed by some, then why is every Tom and Harry trying to imitate them in every technology corner they turn???
IF Apple hasn't been innovating... why are so many gadgets measured against Apple products?
Apple-Killer this, Apple-killer that!
IF Apple hasn't been innovating.... how did the iPad became a run-away success whereas Microsoft's Ten-year tablet adventure couldn't boast of ten thousand units sold?
IF Apple is simply laying cliams to existing technologies,.... what stopped others (Samsung included) from doing just that before Apple came in the picture?
RE: Just a Thought
8/27/2012 4:35:07 PM
I don't think the technology was at an acceptable level when MS was doing the tablet. But really the smart phone is built on top of all those early devices - palm pilot, gps devices, windows mobile, etc. Apple hit the timing perfect putting all these devices together when the hardware was finally good enough. They also did a brilliant job tying it all together with iOS. But still everything was their beforehand and its not like you can expect to block every other company from developing a mobile GUI OS.
RE: Just a Thought
8/27/2012 4:46:16 PM
Apple does innovate... they don't invent. Many people routinely misuse these 2 words and think of them as interchangeable when they mean completely different things.
Innovate = to make changes; do something in a new way. IMO, this means that products/processes already exist (ie. have been invented), the innovator simply makes changes to improve the product or process.
Invent = to produce (as something useful) for the first time through the use of the imagination or of ingenious thinking and experiment. IMO, this means the product/process did not exist before the inventor created it.
In business, innovation is probably more important simply due to decreased risk and development costs (making a change to a product people readily use as opposed to inventing a brand new product that people have never seen and may have no use for), but the USPTO is supposed to be more about protecting invention.
RE: Just a Thought
8/27/2012 6:47:17 PM
It should be obvious, but it's because they were successful. Being successful at selling a product doesn't mean that you invented it. In fact, there are numerous examples throughout history of inventors dying penniless while some business exec struck it rich selling their product.
Apple takes other people's ideas and makes them commercially successful, but that shouldn't give them a right to a monopoly over the market. Those ideas still don't belong to them.
"The Space Elevator will be built about 50 years after everyone stops laughing" -- Sir Arthur C. Clarke
Apple, Samsung Release Statements Following Court Decision; Microsoft Gloats
August 24, 2012, 8:54 PM
Doomsday for Samsung in U.S., Jury Rules it Slavishly Infringed Apple's Patents
August 24, 2012, 5:56 PM
Quick Note: "Most Valuable in History" Distinction for Apple? Not Yet
August 21, 2012, 11:31 AM
Google Seeks to Ban Almost Apple's Entire U.S. Product Line
August 21, 2012, 4:50 PM
Samsung Product Chief Takes Issue With Apple "Owning" the Rectangle
July 31, 2012, 1:03 PM
Retiree Sues Apple For $7,500 for Wiping Honeymoon Photos From His iPhone
November 30, 2015, 10:23 AM
iPhone 7 May Pack 3-4 GB Memory, More Storage; 4-Inch Comeback is Rumored
November 20, 2015, 10:12 PM
OnePlus One, OnePlus 2 Will Receive Android Marshmallow in Q1 2016
November 16, 2015, 9:58 AM
Lenovo Whoa: Motorola Droid MAXX 2 and Turbo 2 Break Cover in Leaks
October 26, 2015, 3:12 PM
Leak: Apple Preps for First Real Android App Foray With New Apple Music App
October 24, 2015, 1:59 PM
Pepsi Smartphone? Empty Calories Coming Soon to the Midrange
October 12, 2015, 11:41 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information