South Korean Court: Both Apple and Samsung are Guilty
August 24, 2012 3:14 PM
comment(s) - last by
A handful of older products are banned, both companies forced to pay the other a small amount of damages
Compete on the market, and stop suing each other.
I. A Tie in South Korea is a Win for Samsung
That seemed to be the sentiment from
a court in South Korea
, home to the world's largest phonemaker Samsung Electronics Comp., Ltd. (
). Locked in an international court battle with the world's second largest smartphone maker, Apple, Inc. (
), the South Korean case was one of the first to wrap up, and comes at a time when the companies are
battling for far greater stakes
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
The South Korean court ruled that Apple had infringed on two Samsung patents, and Samsung had infringed on a single Apple patent. Samsung must pay Apple 25M won ($22,000 USD) and Apple must pay Samsung 40M won ($35,300) (20M won per patent).
The court soundly rejected Apple's lawyers' arguments to
owning the rights to designing rectangular smartphones
with curved edges. Commented the court -- there is "no possibility" that Samsung's and Apple's phones and table PCs could be mistaken for the other company's product.
The South Korean court did not think the iPhone looked much like a Galaxy smartphone.
[Image Source: Snapguide]
The court also noted the fact that Apple did not pay estimated royalties pre-trial, as it did in some other locations as a sign of ill faith. It
, "In disputes regarding patent infringement in Japan, the Netherlands and other nations, Apple deposited estimated royalty rates, or expressed its intention to do so, based on the hypothetical acknowledgment of the validity of Samsung's patents and its infringement of them. It hasn't taken similar measures in South Korea."
Given that other regions like the Netherlands had
absolved Apple entirely
of Samsung's infrigement claims, while ruling exclusively against Samsung, the South Korean's court's "tie" ruling is widely viewed as a victory for Samsung.
The decision can be appealed to the federal appeals court. An appeals decision can only be appealed before the South Korea Supreme Court.
II. FRAND Suits -- Okay?
broke with its foreign peers
, ruling that it was valid for Samsung to sue Apple using
"fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory" (FRAND)
licensed standard patents. The South Korean court argued, again, that Apple wasn't truly cooperative, and only tried to be when it felt it might lose.
Writes the court, '"It seems that Apple has sought to avoid Samsung's application for an injunction against Apple's infringement of the standard Frand patents, rather than engaging in a sincere negotiation for the determination of royalty rates based on the rational evaluation and verification of the standard patents in this case."
Judge Bae Jun-Hyun -- a member of the three judge Seoul Central District Court panel that decided the case -- acknowledged, "In the Netherlands, the same argument [by Samsung] was rejected as abuse of its patent right. But each country has a different legal system and standard."
[Original Image: Cayusa/Flickr; modifications: Jason Mick/DailyTech]
While Apple is hardly a small company, some fear the case could make it easier for large companies like Samsung -- who typically own a number of standards patents -- to demand larger royalties from smaller companies in other cases. On the other hand, with large companies like Apple
already doing that with non-standard patents
, and bullying large FRAND patent holders, this could level the playing field in other cases.
With the South Korean case over, all eyes turn to the U.S., a country where FRAND patents typically are not considered valid fodder for lawsuits. In that sense, Samsung's position in the U.S. is considered far weaker.
Still, Apple has a long ways to go to proving that Samsung's current generation of smartphones/tablets infringes on the iPhone/iPad's technology or look and design. Anything less than
a ban on Samsung's latest products
, though, would be an unsatisfactory outcome for Apple, who has struggled to keep up with Samsung in unit sales.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Build it better, and they might buy...
8/24/2012 4:41:24 PM
It doesn't really matter what they do now. A shrinking market position was guaranteed because of their strategy. They are one company.
When you get too greedy, and try to control the whole thing yourself, you can't compete against an army of companies that make up a large industry like the phone industry.
Apple didn't want to let anyone else in because they wanted all the profit, and they got it - for a time. Now the rest of the industry caught up, passed them up, and is developing a controlling position as you would expect.
What they probably should have done is realized they had the chance to pull a Microsoft Windows with iOS, and licensed it out to other manufacturers. Android would have never gotten off the ground in its early stages since at that time it was still an inferior OS, and Apple would have been the de-facto monopoly with control over the sales of basically all apps.
But they didn't do that. So it was only a matter of time.
RE: Build it better, and they might buy...
8/24/2012 5:19:08 PM
Exactly. A closed architecture will only dominate if its far better than the alternative, or far cheaper. For a few years, Apple had an advantage. In 2011, Android caught up and in 2012, surpassed Apple. Apple is spending WAY too much time in the courtroom and not near enough in the product design. They should spend some of that 100 billion cash reserve on R&D and fast.
"Game reviewers fought each other to write the most glowing coverage possible for the powerhouse Sony, MS systems. Reviewers flipped coins to see who would review the Nintendo Wii. The losers got stuck with the job." -- Andy Marken
Samsung CEO to Call Apple's Cook for One Last Settlement Chance
August 20, 2012, 4:11 PM
Samsung Product Chief Takes Issue With Apple "Owning" the Rectangle
July 31, 2012, 1:03 PM
Apple Plays Wile E. Coyote, Sees Galaxy S III Ban Attempt Foiled
June 13, 2012, 1:43 PM
Analysis: Apple is Seeking 10,000x FRAND Rates in Patent Lawsuits
February 29, 2012, 6:15 AM
EU Nails Samsung With Formal Investigation Over 3G Patent Abuse
January 31, 2012, 9:32 AM
Numerous Leaks Detail 4.7" iPhone 6 Processor, RAM, Cellular and NFC Capabilities
August 29, 2014, 10:37 PM
Buzz Grows Over Upcoming Lenovo Vibe X2's "Layered" Rim, Intel Chip
August 29, 2014, 4:59 PM
Sprint Intros Free Wi-Fi Calling for Overseas Travelers
August 29, 2014, 11:30 AM
Nokia HERE Maps to Arrive on Samsung Galaxy Smartphones This October
August 29, 2014, 9:14 AM
Microsoft's Standalone Kinect 2 Goes On Sale Oct. 7 for $150
August 28, 2014, 4:33 PM
Apple Builds Not-So-Secret Secret 3-Story Tower for iPhone 6/iWatch Unveil
August 28, 2014, 3:41 PM
Most Popular Articles
Microsoft's Surface 2 Tablet Family Gets a $100 Price Cut
August 25, 2014, 1:16 AM
Owner of "Decepticon" Maserati Ordered to Appear in Court This Thursday
August 25, 2014, 7:55 AM
LG Posts Teaser Video of Its “Round Face” G Watch R Smartwatch, Set for IFA Lauch
August 24, 2014, 2:49 PM
Windows 9: "Upgrade Now" Button Coming for Enterprise Updates, ARM Preview in H1 2015
August 26, 2014, 8:00 PM
Second ZMapp-Treated Patient Dies of Ebola, Supplies Run Out
August 25, 2014, 7:03 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Space Terrorism is a Looming Threat For the United States
Apr 23, 2014, 7:47 PM
Facebook Aims to Provide Internet to "Every Person in the World" with Drones, Satellites
Apr 1, 2014, 10:20 AM
Retail Mobile Sites Experience Outages in Light of Simplexity's Bankruptcy
Mar 14, 2014, 8:48 AM
Tesla vs. BMW: Who Has the Safer EV?
Feb 1, 2014, 2:56 PM
Justice Leaks Details of Next HTC One Two Flagship Phone
Dec 5, 2013, 4:04 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information