backtop


Print 97 comment(s) - last by sorry dog.. on Aug 25 at 12:12 PM

California lawmakers want driverless cars legalized within the state

Few will argue with the fact that one of the only ways to eliminate distracted driving is to completely remove the driver from the equation. This is in part what automated, driverless vehicles -- such as the fleet that Google is operating around the country -- promise. The cars are expected to be safer because distracted drivers will no longer be an issue. Google's driverless fleet has racked up 300,000 accident-free miles.
 
Driverless vehicles can also allow those who were unable to drive themselves to get around without having to seek assistance. Other than making the roads safer, driverless cars also promise to decrease congestion and delays on the nation's roadways by eliminating accidents.
 
California is making moves to get these driverless vehicles on its state roads with one California legislator introducing a bill seeking to clarify that driverless cars are street legal. Google continues to be one of the major driving forces behind driverless vehicles, although there are other companies working in the industry.
 
Google believes that it has the computer science knowledge and financial strength to bring driverless cars to reality for Americans. "It's amazing to me that we (even) let humans drive cars," Google Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt said a few years ago.
 
A lot of the technology needed for driverless vehicles is already available, and some vehicles on the streets today have many of the components needed to make this feat possible. Industry Association Auto Alliance represents Toyota, Ford, GM, BMW, and other major automakers. According to Auto Alliance, its members are individually exploring autonomous vehicle technology, and the association says that great strides have been made in the past decade.
 
Ford and GM, for instance, are working on autonomous braking technology that allows the car to bring itself to a complete stop when radar and other sensors the vehicle use sense an impending accident.
 
While some state legislators in California are trying to get the vehicles legalized for road use within the state, other states such as Nevada already allow driverless cars to operate on its roads.

Source: Detroit News



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: I drive casue I have to
By tayb on 8/23/2012 4:51:21 PM , Rating: 2
Same here. Driving is a waste of time, unproductive, and expensive. I'm laughing at the people who say I must be "bad" at driving to hold this opinion. As if my skill in any given endeavor determines my enjoyment of said endeavor. I love playing softball even though I suck at it. I don't like to cook, but I've been told I have excellent taste buds and would be excellent at it. I've seen dumb arguments on this site before but this one is near the top.

Part of the "expensive" part of driving is how much time I waste sitting in traffic. Opportunity costs through the roof plus the actual cost of gas and wear and tear on my car. With robots driving there won't be any traffic. Traffic is caused by human stupidity. I spend probably 10 hours a month in traffic. Just think... 5 whole days a year I could save. Wow.

I don't understand what people enjoy about driving just as I don't understand what people enjoy about smoking a cigarette while drinking booze. Fortunately, their enjoyments aren't predicated on my understanding of them. They can enjoy or not enjoy what they like. I won't be so silly as to say that they enjoy smoking because they are good at it. That would be dumb.


"It looks like the iPhone 4 might be their Vista, and I'm okay with that." -- Microsoft COO Kevin Turner














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki