California Pushes for Driverless, Automated Cars
August 23, 2012 9:07 AM
comment(s) - last by
California lawmakers want driverless cars legalized within the state
Few will argue with the fact that one of the only ways to eliminate distracted driving is to completely remove the driver from the equation. This is in part what automated, driverless vehicles -- such as the fleet that Google is operating around the country -- promise. The cars are expected to be safer because distracted drivers will no longer be an issue. Google's driverless fleet has racked up
300,000 accident-free miles
Driverless vehicles can also allow those who were unable to drive themselves to get around without having to seek assistance. Other than making the roads safer, driverless cars also promise to decrease congestion and delays on the nation's roadways by eliminating accidents.
California is making moves to get these
on its state roads with one California legislator introducing a bill seeking to clarify that driverless cars are street legal. Google continues to be one of the major driving forces behind driverless vehicles, although there are other companies working in the industry.
Google believes that it has the computer science knowledge and financial strength to bring driverless cars to reality for Americans. "It's amazing to me that we (even) let humans drive cars," Google Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt said a few years ago.
A lot of the technology needed for driverless vehicles is already available, and some vehicles on the streets today have many of the components needed to make this feat possible. Industry Association Auto Alliance represents Toyota, Ford, GM, BMW, and other major automakers. According to Auto Alliance, its members are individually exploring autonomous vehicle technology, and the association says that great strides have been made in the past decade.
Ford and GM, for instance, are working on autonomous braking technology that allows the car to bring itself to a complete stop when radar and other sensors the vehicle use sense an impending accident.
While some state legislators in California are trying to get the vehicles legalized for road use within the state, other states such as Nevada already allow driverless cars to operate on its roads.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
The ramifications will be larger than most think
8/23/2012 1:30:39 PM
Self-driving cars are the future, but there are a lot more pros and cons than most people think about.
IF everything was automated:
Traffic jams wouldn't need to exist (except to accommodate pedestrian traffic and the occasional accident).
Average speed would increase (peak speeds would decrease)
MPG would increase dramatically
People could sleep or do anything they want while commuting
Travel would most likely increase dramatically
If we get past the technical and political issues, what would this do to our cities? Everyone wants the American dream. Everyone wants a big house, a backyard, etc. If mpg dramatically increased (making transportation cheaper) and was automated, Urban Sprawl would also greatly increase.
Some people already drive hours a day to/from work, what would happen if it they could sleep the whole time? Would commuting distance go from 1 hour to 4? A person could sleep only in their car, and use the other 17 or so hours a day to work or be with their family.
Would we create additional roads for these ultra-suburbs? Would there actually be more cars on the road at any one time because driving is now so easy? How much farmland will we lose to this?
The obvious questions will have to be settled first, but there are many other interesting questions to ask about the future.
RE: The ramifications will be larger than most think
8/23/2012 2:48:22 PM
Traffic jams wouldn't need to exist
Unfortunately, you are wrong here. Traffic jams will still exist even if most vehicles were driverless.
The forerunner of a traffic jam is congestion, which naturally happens when you have the concentrative effect of people driving from a wide area e.g. "the suburbs", into a small area e.g. "the central business district", "downtown", etc. No matter how carefully you plan it, you will get congestion. As I see it, "congestion" isn't the same as "a traffic jam", it is just one of the prime ingredients to it, which is when there are so many vehicles within an area they essentially cannot move without hitting one another, which isn't good.
My belief is a lot of traffic jams are avoidable, especially those that happen on a daily basis, and the key to that is proper traffic management.
"We can't expect users to use common sense. That would eliminate the need for all sorts of legislation, committees, oversight and lawyers." -- Christopher Jennings
Google Self-Driving Cars Log 300,000 Accident-Free Miles*
August 13, 2012, 8:41 AM
CA State Sen. Alex Padilla Pushes for Autonomous Vehicle Guidelines
March 5, 2012, 10:23 AM
Ford, Toyota, and Universal Pictures Celebrate "Back to the Future Day' in Style
October 21, 2015, 4:19 PM
Consumer Reports Flexes Muscle, Hits Slumping Tesla Motors Stock
October 20, 2015, 4:13 PM
Debunked: Beneath the Lies, Nigerian "Pee Generator" Is Still Pissing Into the Wind
October 19, 2015, 7:53 PM
Hot Air? President Obama, G7 Pledge to Eliminate Most Fossil Fuel Use by 2100
June 8, 2015, 5:40 PM
Study Predicts Self-Driving Vehicles Could Rake in Billions
March 6, 2015, 8:34 AM
Dual-Motor Tesla Model S P85D's "Insane Mode" Shocks Passengers
January 28, 2015, 11:18 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information