AT&T Responds to FaceTime Criticism, Says It Did Nothing Wrong
August 22, 2012 12:20 PM
comment(s) - last by
AT&T claims it didn't violate any FCC rules and that it doesn't HAVE to make any preloaded apps available
Rumors recently started circulating that
AT&T may have violated Federal Communications Commission (FCC) rules
by limiting FaceTime availability on Apple's iOS 6. AT&T, likely feeling threatened by possible issues with the feds, has finally responded to these concerns.
Here's a little backstory for those who haven't been keeping up: AT&T recently announced that it would
restrict video chat application FaceTime
, which is preloaded onto Apple's iPhone, to 3G/4G Mobile Share data plans only for the next-generation iPhone. Those with older tiered or unlimited data plans will be excluded. However, all users, no matter the data plan, can use FaceTime over Wi-Fi. This angered customers and watchdog groups, who claimed that AT&T was limiting FaceTime because it was direct competition with its own voice or video telephony services. This was seen as a violation FCC rules (even thought the FCC hasn't declared this yet).
Now, AT&T has offered an explanation. It said that FaceTime has been used over Wi-Fi for years. The company believed it was expanding FaceTime's availability by now offering it on AT&T Mobile Share data plans in addition to Wi-Fi, and mentioned that no FCC rules regulate availability of preloaded apps to customers.
AT&T added that there are only two FCC rules for carriers: make business practices and information transparent, and don't block applications that may compete with their own. According to AT&T, it has violated neither.
"AT&T's plans for FaceTime will not violate either requirement," said the company in a statement. "Our policies regarding FaceTime will be fully transparent to all consumers, and no one has argued to the contrary. There is no transparency issue here.
"Nor is there a blocking issue. The FCC's net neutrality rules do not regulate the availability to customers of applications that are preloaded on phones. Indeed, the rules do not require that providers make available
preloaded apps. Rather, they address whether customers are able to download apps that compete with our voice or video telephony services. AT&T does not restrict customers from downloading any such lawful applications, and there are several video chat apps available in the several app stores serving particular operating systems.
"I won't name any of them for fear that I will be accused by these same groups of discriminating in favor of those apps. But just go to your app store on your device and type 'video chat.'"
AT&T further added that it does not have a competing video chat service; hence that was not the reason for
limiting FaceTime to Mobile Share data plans
. The real reason, according to the carrier, is that the expansion of FaceTime to data plans instead of just Wi-Fi could strain the network, so it just limited to the Mobile Share data plans.
However, this will likely still upset customers who are paying for data and expect that AT&T won't restrict what they access when paying for such services. If you're paying a pretty penny each month for data (and we all know data isn't cheap), it doesn't seem unreasonable to expect the carrier to build up its network to handle additional bandwidth.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
If you cap, you can't limit. PERIOD.
8/23/2012 11:31:10 PM
How about asking AT&T how they think it makes a fucking bit of sense to restrict how anyone can use their limited quantities of data?
I don't have problems with restricting utilization of "unlimited" data plans on wireless carriers, because spectrum is in fact limited and there's no practical way to support hundreds of users running video at the same time over a mobile network.
That said, once you apply data caps to the situation, all that goes out the window. If I have 2, 5, 10, or whatever amount of gigabytes per month how does it matter in the slightest the way in which I use it? 2GB of Facetime vs. 2GB of Youtube vs. 2GB of Netflix vs. 2GB of app downloads are all the same to the mobile network. Tethering, video chat, etc. is irrelevant when caps are in play. There is no legitimate excuse for limits in these cases, it just means 100% the company is run by assholes, end of story.
"This is from the DailyTech.com. It's a science website." -- Rush Limbaugh
AT&T's FaceTime Limitations Might Cause Trouble with FCC Rules
August 20, 2012, 11:06 PM
AT&T Enables FaceTime Over 3G/4G, Limits It to Mobile Share Data Plans
August 18, 2012, 1:52 AM
Retiree Sues Apple For $7,500 for Wiping Honeymoon Photos From His iPhone
November 30, 2015, 10:23 AM
iPhone 7 May Pack 3-4 GB Memory, More Storage; 4-Inch Comeback is Rumored
November 20, 2015, 10:12 PM
OnePlus One, OnePlus 2 Will Receive Android Marshmallow in Q1 2016
November 16, 2015, 9:58 AM
Lenovo Whoa: Motorola Droid MAXX 2 and Turbo 2 Break Cover in Leaks
October 26, 2015, 3:12 PM
Leak: Apple Preps for First Real Android App Foray With New Apple Music App
October 24, 2015, 1:59 PM
Pepsi Smartphone? Empty Calories Coming Soon to the Midrange
October 12, 2015, 11:41 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information