Print 25 comment(s) - last by BifurcatedBoat.. on Aug 23 at 5:38 PM

CEO and VPs are reportedly contemplating jumping off the ship on their golden parachutes

Since its inception, Hulu has had a rather baffling ownership stew and a tough goal -- making streaming, exclusive internet video content profitable.  Yet somehow it made it work.

But all is not perfectly at peace in the land of Hulu green; Variety has an interesting piece detailing Hulu's growing pains, including preparations for the possible departure long-time CEO Jason Kilar.

I. Will Kilar Seize His Golden Parachute?

An internal memo quoted by the report writes, "Outline transition plan for new CEO. Discuss potential candidates and process."

Hulu has been kicking around on the net since March 2007 and Mr. Kilar, a Harvard Business School grad, has been leading it since June 2007.  Originally Hulu was to be an independent service -- co-owned by News Corp. (NWS) and Comcast Corp. (CMCSA) and distributed by Myspace, Yahoo, Inc. (YHOO), Comcast, and Facebook, Inc. (FB), among others.  The site went live in 2008, and instantly made a small splash, being one of the few pages to rival Google Inc.'s (GOOG) YouTube.  Then in April 2009, The Walt Disney Comp. (DISjumped onboard, purchasing a 27 percent stake.

Since then, News Corp. and Disney have taken a leading role in terms of steering the company's direction, as Comcast's acquisition of co-owner NBC Universal has prevented it from participating in decisions for antitrust reasons.

Things became complicated when the pair agreed to a management buyout from founding co-owner Providence Equity Partners.  Part of the terms of that buyout was that Hulu's founding managers -- including Jason Kilar -- could now cash out a significant number of vested shares.  For Mr. Kilar, who holds approximately 5 percent of Hulu shares, this may amount to a $100M USD compensation package payday -- pretty compelling temptation to leave.

Jason Kilar
Jason Kilar could score $100M USD if he leaves Hulu. [Image Source: The Hollywood Reporter]

The Hulu memo discusses eliminating exclusive content from the "free" (ad-supported) homepage.  This means that Disney and others could potentially cut deals with Google's YouTube, weakening Hulu's position.  It also eliminates "content parity", meaning players like Disney (owner of ABC) and News Corp. (owner of FOX) can hold back content for their own websites, to differentiate them -- further weakening Hulu.

Lastly, it also discusses cutting back on Hulu's international efforts.  News Corp. expressed its desire to "limit" its investment in bringing Hulu International to $30M USD, while Disney "would like to discuss a less ambitious product which requires less capital investment but which could prove to be a good business."

II. The Networks Don't Know What They Want

Such provisions could yield a smaller, but more profitable Hulu, which could help drive away a high-profile executive like Mr. Kilar.  But he insists in past interviews that he wants to continue to lead the business and help it mature.

Hulu is worth $2B USD today, approximately twice its $1B USD founding value.  Providence Equity Partners is thought to have approximately doubled its $100M USD, 10 percent stake in the buyout.

The streaming video site is expected to make about $420M USD -- a level of monetization experts call impressive.  Many view Hulu Plus -- an $8 USD/month premium service -- as key to the site increasing its profits.  Last year, Hulu pulled in almost $200M USD from its 2 million Plus subscribers.  Boosting that number could mean bringing Hulu closer to moneymaking parity with major television networks like FOX, who draw far bigger revenues from advertisers and distribution/licensing payments.

ABC on Hulu
Networks like ABC (Disney) and FOX (News Corp.) want to profit off of premium Hulu subscriptions, but they also want to yank exclusive content from Hulu to increase profits at their own private sites, yielding a troubled marriage.

The report also mentions fears that two other major executive shareholders -- Andy Forssell, senior VP of content, and Jean Paul (J.P.) Colaco, senior VP of advertising -- may leave/cash out, as well.

In short, this is a very volatile time for Hulu.  Its big media network owners are waiving in their commitment, even as its top leadership consider seizing their golden parachutes and leaping off the ship.  Ultimately the big media owners may be most to blame for this.  

While Hulu is a bona fide success story, today rivaling YouTube, its big media ownership appears quite befuddled. It sends quite the mixed message for network investors to say they want to grow premium content customers, while also discussing removing premium content from the common site, to hoard their on your own private site.

Ultimately, this may be a case of big media's greed killing a good thing they have going.

Source: Variety

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By tayb on 8/20/2012 8:58:52 PM , Rating: -1
What a complete crock of crap.

If you want to change how big media treats online consumption stop consuming content from big media. That means stop downloading it illegally and stop tuning in. When you download illegally all you're doing is signaling that piracy is an issue but demand is still strong. The reaction is to double down on piracy efforts, not change distribution methods.

What I find most ironic/amusing about people such as yourself is that you whine and complain about DRM and similar tactics while simultaneously acting as the cause of such tactics. In a funny twist you are actually the cause of your own complaints.

There are plenty of legitimate reasons to "pirate" media. You bought a movie and want to back it up, you bought a movie but the DVD broke, or anything of the sort. "The content is too expensive" has never and will never be a legitimate reason to steal content. You're making the problem worse and bitching about it all at the same time.

By Jeffk464 on 8/20/2012 11:44:04 PM , Rating: 3
I don't think you need to stop buying content to show a drop in demand. You need to stop spending on media from expensive sources. If your local theater sets the price to high wait for movies to come out on blu-ray. The studios stop offering their films to netflix - go to redbox. Show the studios that people won't accept overblown pricing. By the way I decided cable was to expensive for the couple of decent channels you end up with so I just stuck an antenna on the roof. If discovery channel puts on a decent shows, seems to be less and less, I will buy those shows on amazon if I have to.

You know the funny thing is that the response to the millions of people getting fet up with the cost of cable and cutting the cord was for the cable companies to raise the cost.

By Jeffk464 on 8/20/2012 11:47:18 PM , Rating: 2
PS I also sold my shares of Comcast, whether they like it or not they will eventually just be an ISP.

"Vista runs on Atom ... It's just no one uses it". -- Intel CEO Paul Otellini

Copyright 2015 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki