Print 69 comment(s) - last by Master Kenobi.. on Aug 22 at 12:57 PM

  (Source: Columbia Pictures )

Professor Julian Savulescu  (Source:
The process would be similar to checking embryos for conditions like Down's syndrome

Imagine being able to design a human the way we use computer software to design every day items like clothing or furniture. University of Oxford Professor Julian Savulescu recently said that parents should have the choice to do such a thing, allowing them to create the kind of child they desire rather than leaving it to chance. 

According to Savulescu, the manipulation of genetics has evolved over the years and has already proven to be beneficial to those who are expecting. For instance, parents can use tests, which focus on particular genes in embryos, to see if their child will have certain conditions like Down's syndrome. 

While this type of testing is not seen as an issue, Savulescu said the testing of an embryo's genes to see what kind of personality flaws it could have has raised concern amongst the public -- and he believes it shouldn't.

"Indeed, when it comes to screening out personality flaws, such as potential alcoholism, psychopathy and disposition to violence, you could argue that people have a moral obligation to to select ethically better children," said Savulescu. "They are, after all, less likely to harm themselves and others. If we have the power to intervene in the nature of our offspring -- rather than consigning them to the natural lottery -- then we should." 

Savulescu's ideas have been compared to those of the Nazis, who adopted the eugenics movements during World War II. However, Savulescu argues that this is different because parents can choose to participate or not. They don't have to genetically alter their children, but they should be able to choose to, he said. 

"Whether we like it or not, the future of humanity is in our hands now," said Savulescu. "Rather than fearing genetics, we should embrace it. We can do better than chance." 

Savulescu posed this argument in a recent article in Reader's Digest

What do you think? Could eliminating potential character flaws in embryos create a perfect human race, or could there be serious, unseen implications with having so much power over this thing called life?

Source: The Telegraph

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: but...
By Breathless on 8/21/2012 12:51:32 PM , Rating: 2
If we went with what "just about every mainstream medical, psychological, and educational organization in the U.S" thought about things, we could just as easily conclude many ridiculous things... For instance, "disliking Obama is racist."

Just about every "mainstream" anything is horribly liberal and provides endless excuses as a substitute for hard work and dealing with life's struggles without drugs.... For instance, my wife died last year a horrible, horrible, slow and painful death. I watched the person I cared about most experience more horrific pain than most people can imagine or ever will see. "Just about every mainstream medical, psychological, and educational organization in the U.S" would have suggested I take antidepressants, sleep meds, and all kinds of drugs to "make me feel better and get me over this hurtle". The reality is that certain things just suck. By choice, meds were not an option for me, and I have not taken ANY medications "to help" me through this difficult time. I live a very difficult life now, but somehow, with faith and a little common sense, and some suffering, I am able to proceed through life without venturing down the avenue of "Doctor Feel Good", as you are experiencing now yourself as an adult by "choosing" not to do so yourself. Amazing how we are able to do it isn't it?

I'm not saying you don't have difficulty concentrating, I'm saying you can clearly deal with it, and others can to. It would be terribly more difficult for me to succeed in the field of quantum physics than someone else more gifted in this area. It doesn't mean I need to take brain enhancing drugs to give me this ability, it means I need to choose a different career path!

RE: but...
By Reclaimer77 on 8/21/2012 4:00:58 PM , Rating: 2
No offense Breathless, but this is spoken like someone without ADD who just doesn't understand.

Living with ADD/ADHD, especially as a child, isn't "taking the easy way out" or "making excuses". If someone could exert the control necessary to conform, he would, believe me. No child would choose to be isolated and punished constantly, which is what living with ADD/ADHD means for someone.

I'm sorry for the loss of your wife, however comparing a condition to intense grief is just.. it's not right. Your comparing "feel good" drugs to a brain chemistry problem. The science has already been done! This is not an argument anymore. Google "Brain scans and ADHD", for example.

I know you think you're trying to help, but it's coming off condescending. Because you simply do not understand what it means to live with this. It's like telling someone with Tourettes to just "stop cursing". But this is typical when trying to discuss this with someone who can't grasp how someone could have difficulty with things they take for granted.

"It looks like the iPhone 4 might be their Vista, and I'm okay with that." -- Microsoft COO Kevin Turner

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki