Judge Koh to Apple Lawyers: Are You "Smoking Crack"?
August 17, 2012 9:45 AM
comment(s) - last by
(Source: Comedy Central)
As with Motorola case, Apple is starting to get on the judge's nerves in its case against Samsung
Like a boss, Apple, Inc. (
) went out and poured money into recruiting top tier legal representation to sue its rivals. In
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
, this synergy seemed on the verge of succeeding after Apple's lawyers micromanaged to
exclude certain high profile pieces of evidence
from rival Samsung Electronics Comp., Ltd. (
), while allowing its
own star exhibits
. But it appears that yet again Apple is brushing off on its attorneys, as they've found a way annoy yet another judge.
After enduring the seeming harassment of a 75-page briefing requesting 22 rebuttal witnesses for next week, presiding
Judge Lucy Koh
changed her tone, no longer looking to give Apple any courtroom promotion. In fact the filing had Judge Koh inquiring whether Apple attorneys had been busy scoring some coke.
She asked Apple why they would present her the document "when unless you're smoking crack you know these witnesses aren't going to be called!"
But Apple attorney William Lee insists that he wasn't looking for the
free crack giveway
, commenting, "First, your honor, I'm not smoking crack. I can promise you that."
He argued that a couple of the witnesses on his lists were Samsung's. As Samsung and Apple's legal teams then fell into a noisy legal argument, she exclaimed,
a courtroom reporter for
, "I'm billing time because you all are being unreasonable."
Judge Koh had already pushed both sides to cut down on the time of their arguments, saying the court could not devote itself to being a full-time Apple v. Samsung court. Apple tested the waters last week, asking Judge Koh to allow a rebuttal witness, designer Susan Kare, after its early design witnesses had
struggled under cross-examination
Judge Koh has grown increasingly frustrated with Apple's attorneys during the lawsuit against Samsung. [Image Source: IB Times]
But Apple said Ms. Kare couldn't return to court until next week due to "family matters".
Irritated, Judge Koh told Apple's team that unless Ms. Kare could come this week, she wouldn't be coming at all. But Apple's lawyers apparently couldn't take the hint, requesting even more witnesses for next week on Thursday.
That kind of belligerent filings and judicial frustrations strikes eerily similar to that encountered in the case against Google Inc. (
) subsidiary Motorola which Apple presented to
Judge Richard A. Posner
Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals
judge moonlighting in the
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois
Judge Posner initially seemed
inclined to listen
to Apple's infringement claims, but after Apple insisted on appealing every single decision --
even its own victories
-- with a slew of junk filings, his sentiments shifted sharply. With both sides quibbling and unable to reach a settlement, he decided the best course of action was to
toss out both sides' cases
. He dismissed the lawsuits "with prejudice".
As Judge Koh experiences a similar "eye opening" experience regarding Apple legal's policy of irritating filings, one has to wonder whether Apple v. Samsung might face a similar fate.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: The Only People Apple Pisses Off
8/17/2012 1:31:41 PM
I've looked at death in the eye, fearing only weeks/days/hours to live and survived. During this period I revised my viewpoint on many things in life--including the universe, time and space, physics, priorities etc.
The one thing, in all that time that I found offered me the least amount of comfort was... money. If I had died, what good would that money have done me? If I had lived--it might have made my life easier.
But, for what? It would require sacrificing time. Time that could be better spent on things that mean something to more than just myself and the rest of the world.
Don't get me wrong--I admire philanthropers like Bill Gates and Warren Buffet who seek to give away their fortunes in the form of trusts to better society. I think that is wonderful and great--and the right thing to do.
Most people, though, who lust after money, I find sacrifice many things in their life in pursuit of it. Things such as family (children especially suffer), personal time, society, morals, ethics and so on. All for what? A shiny car (BMW, Mercedes etc.), a giant house, a big screen television. Things that supposedly make them important.
When you're dying though--none of that makes you important. Just look at Steve--he was worth billions, yet, none of it did him any good. At best it bought him a few more years but that was all. He couldn't cheat death, not for all the money he had.
I know people who have given up their hopes and dreams just to make another dollar--just to get a little richer... only to come to the end of their days with a slap to their face realizing that they never got to enjoy any of it, only to die younger than they wished for failing to take care of themselves.
I'm a capitalist and a believer in the free markets. I don't, though, think that money should be anyone's central focus in their life. Greed leads to the worst coming out in people. They kill for it, trample for it, abuse for it and even destroy for it.
This is why I look at it the way I do.
Unfortunately, to see things this way, you almost have to look death in the eye--and that is an experience I don't wish upon anyone.
RE: The Only People Apple Pisses Off
8/20/2012 2:32:56 PM
I agree with what you say, but not all people who sacrifice things in life to get money do so just for status.
They do it so they have enough money to do the things that are important to them and to provide for their family.
Even billionaires will go to work, because that is important to them. Not necessarily to make more money, that's just an affect of what they enjoy.
Like Tosh says, "I've never seen anyone frowning on jetski"
"Young lady, in this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics!" -- Homer Simpson
Samsung Shines Against Apple Design Expert, But Struggles w/ Embarrassing Doc
August 8, 2012, 2:08 PM
Judge Excludes Samsung's "Sci-Fi" Tablet Evidence From Trial
August 3, 2012, 2:54 PM
Samsung Emails Bolster Apple's "Copying" Claims, But Show Innovation Too
July 27, 2012, 4:55 PM
Judge Posner Dismisses Apple-Motorola Case Again, Blasts Apple
June 25, 2012, 1:44 PM
Apple Inserts Foot in Mouth, is Blasted for Complaining About U.S. Victory
April 4, 2012, 3:30 PM
Retiree Sues Apple For $7,500 for Wiping Honeymoon Photos From His iPhone
November 30, 2015, 10:23 AM
iPhone 7 May Pack 3-4 GB Memory, More Storage; 4-Inch Comeback is Rumored
November 20, 2015, 10:12 PM
OnePlus One, OnePlus 2 Will Receive Android Marshmallow in Q1 2016
November 16, 2015, 9:58 AM
Lenovo Whoa: Motorola Droid MAXX 2 and Turbo 2 Break Cover in Leaks
October 26, 2015, 3:12 PM
Leak: Apple Preps for First Real Android App Foray With New Apple Music App
October 24, 2015, 1:59 PM
Pepsi Smartphone? Empty Calories Coming Soon to the Midrange
October 12, 2015, 11:41 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information