New NASA Reform Bill Under Development for Fixed Budget
August 14, 2012 6:34 PM
comment(s) - last by
Rep. John Culberson (R-TX)
The new bill would help NASA budget its funding over the long term
Two House Representatives are creating a NASA reform bill in an effort to help the agency with funding and long-term projects.
Rep. John Culberson (R-TX) and Rep. Frank Wolf (R-VA) have joined forces to propose the new NASA reform bill. The bill aims to help NASA budget its funding over longer periods of time and also eliminate the politics that affect long-term projects.
Money is a huge factor in determining what NASA can and cannot do. Last October, the space agency
urged Congress to provide $850 million in full
for commercial crew vehicle development after NASA's space shuttle fleet was retired. This was necessary so that the U.S. wouldn't have to depend on Russia for a flight to the International Space Station (ISS), which is expected to increase to about $63 million per set by 2015.
The new bill wants to place funding on a multi-year cycle rather than just an annual cycle. This will allow NASA to budget its funding over a longer period of time, rather than have to beg for more money each year in order to finish a project. NASA will know exactly how much it has ahead of time, and will be able to allot the total amount more efficiently.
Aside from money, politics has become an issue for NASA. The Obama administration ended the
rather quickly after $10 billion had already been spent on what was meant to put the U.S. back into space after the retirement of the space shuttle fleet.
The reform bill's attempt to not only create a fixed, long-term budget, but also appoint a NASA administrator to a 10-year term, will make NASA a well-oiled machine for a longer period of time and help progress the U.S.' space program without any intrusion from politics or begging to Congress.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
8/14/2012 10:58:25 PM
The idea is probably still-born in an election year, but more details would be good to know for future Congresses. I'm not sure I like the idea of potentially having a NASA administrator that has a longer term then a term-limited president, but longer-term funding only seems logical.
A good idea would be far greater independence. NASA gets line-itemed or ear-marked to death, with politicians micro-managing funding. I think giving NASA some sort of appointed oversight committee with lengthy appointments and giving that committee an annual (or perhaps every 3 years, to give every President a shot at an impact) block grant with no strings attached would be a sound way forward.
That'd give NASA political independence, some clarity on its budget, and still leave room for politicians to put NASA back in line if it got out of hand. If ear-marks are agreed to occasionally be very useful and necessary, maybe stipulate in law they make up no more than 10% of the total?
Just ideas off the cuff, but this sort of discussion is great for NASA's future. It's been sick watching the future of projects like the TPF hang in the balance of some House committee.
RE: More details!
8/15/2012 11:32:53 AM
i can agree, more details would be great.
its nice some can realize that NASA needs a longer term outlook. where it doesnt have to worry that what it is doing is going to change every 4 years, which results in lots of waste and little progress.
RE: More details!
8/15/2012 3:34:54 PM
I totally agree with this. As much as a hate to say so, the fact is that everything needs to be downsized if we have any chance to come of this debt. I will never ever get over the absolute stupidity of going into an unnecessary war. Those wasted trillions could do wonders for us right now. Talk about fiscal irresponsibility, we borrowed the money to go to war. But we can't go back and undo it. We just have to move forward.
Its a sad state of affairs when we are pulling so much money out of basic research and education. Research that, in the past, has shown to be of great benefit to this country, its people, and economy. People don't understand that many of "our" scientists are not ours. They come from countries that value science and math as a part of education and as a part of society. If the money dries up here, they will go elsewhere to do their research. The detrimental long term effects of this cannot be underestimated. New technology brings about new jobs.
"Mac OS X is like living in a farmhouse in the country with no locks, and Windows is living in a house with bars on the windows in the bad part of town." -- Charlie Miller
Show Me The Money: NASA Needs $850 Million for Commercial Crew Vehicle Development
October 21, 2011, 12:00 PM
NASA Stands Behind Constellation Program
July 30, 2009, 3:15 PM
Creationists are Mad About Google Doodle Depicting Evolution
November 24, 2015, 8:48 PM
DHS and TSA: Whoops, We Missed That 73 Airport Employees May be Terrorists
November 19, 2015, 2:16 PM
Star Wars Spinoff Film "Rogue One", Theme Park Attractions Announced
August 17, 2015, 12:20 PM
SpaceX Falcon 9's Seventh Supply Mission to ISS Ends w/ Fiery Stage 1 Explosion
June 28, 2015, 1:10 PM
Cool Science Video: Glowing Millipede Prowls the Nevada Desert
May 18, 2015, 12:00 PM
Newly Discovered Costa Rican Glass Frog is Kermit's Doppelgänger
April 22, 2015, 11:26 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information