Apple and Microsoft's Licensing Pact Spells Out Cloning Taboo
August 14, 2012 1:24 PM
comment(s) - last by
Thou shalt not clone, says the legalese
It's common knowledge that when Microsoft Corp. (
) briefly stepped in to save the
train wreck that was Apple
, Inc. (
) in the mid-nineties, the pair cemented their bond with a
deep cross-licensing pact
which has been responsible for the relative peace between the pair in these hyper-litigious times. During the
copyright infringement trial
being held at the
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
between Samsung Electronics Comp., Ltd. (
) and Apple, that licensing relationship was the topic of some questions, questions that raised interesting details.
Apple patent licensing/strategy director Boris Teksler is quoted by
as testifying, "The Apple and Microsoft cross-license does cover the design patents. However, we took special prohibitions from both parties so there is what I term an 'anti-cloning' provision... so we couldn't copy each other's products. There's a clear acknowledgement that there's no copying."
The cross-licensing agreement covered both design (aesthetics) and utility (technology) patents worldwide.
[PDF] of that 1997 arrangement it then highlighted the passage that Mr. Teksler was talking about:
In other words, Apple and Microsoft won't sue each other for individual features (e.g.
swipe to unlock
, or bounce animations) or minor design details (e.g.
a rectangular smartphone
), but if either company feels the other is "slavishly copying" the entire comprehensive product, they could -- in theory, at least -- sue the other.
Is this interesting? Certainly.
How does it affect the Samsung v. Apple case? That is unclear. Apple clearly claims that Samsung "cloned" its products.
Apple claims Samsung "slavishly copied" its products. [Source:
David Paul Morris/Getty Images
But ultimately this testimony could be used against Apple if Samsung can establish that its smartphones/tablets are as different from the iPhone/iPad in design and user interface as Windows Phone 7 handsets and Windows tablets are from the iPhone/iPad. Because if the level of differences is similar, and it was enough to constitute "slavishly copying"/cloning, the question would be why Apple isn't suing Microsoft as well.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
8/14/2012 2:40:50 PM
I wonder what the threshold is, as far as evidence is concerned, for Samsung or other Android manufacturers to prove collusion. It really seems to me like Apple and Microsoft do these licensing deals with each other as a sort of gentlemen's agreement to split the world between them while working together to crush everyone else. Shouldn't this count as a cartel at some point? Maybe only if MS gains traction in the mobile space with the new tablets and phones being prepped for release?
I suppose it might be harder to prove since they're doing it by abusing the patent system as opposed to retail price fixing.
"Nowadays, security guys break the Mac every single day. Every single day, they come out with a total exploit, your machine can be taken over totally. I dare anybody to do that once a month on the Windows machine." -- Bill Gates
Samsung Shines Against Apple Design Expert, But Struggles w/ Embarrassing Doc
August 8, 2012, 2:08 PM
Samsung Product Chief Takes Issue With Apple "Owning" the Rectangle
July 31, 2012, 1:03 PM
Apple Patents Mobile Lists, Method to Make a Graphic Disappear; Plans More Suits
July 18, 2012, 2:40 PM
Tudor Brown Retiring After Propelling ARM to the Top of Mobile Market
November 12, 2011, 1:00 AM
Master of Unlocking: Apple Patents Swipe-to-Unlock Despite Prior Art
October 26, 2011, 3:27 PM
3D Systems Acquires Xerox’s Solid Ink Teams in Oregon
December 18, 2013, 7:54 PM
While FCC Debates Allowing In-flight Voice Calls, Delta is Already Saying “Nope”
December 18, 2013, 12:11 PM
New Mac Pro Launches Tomorrow, Starts at $2,999
December 18, 2013, 10:56 AM
LG Introduces Chrome OS-Powered "Chromebase" AIO
December 18, 2013, 9:46 AM
Google Testing Smart Thermostat in St. Louis
December 17, 2013, 11:43 AM
Microsoft Wins "Synchronized Calendar" Patent Case Against Motorola Mobility
December 17, 2013, 11:23 AM
Most Popular Articles
China's Lunar Rover Enters Orbit, Prepares for Historic Sat. Landing
December 13, 2013, 5:00 PM
Metro-Enabled Firefox Browser Expected to Land After Two Years of Work
December 12, 2013, 5:21 PM
The History of Normandy: How Nokia Plotted a Low-End Android Line
December 11, 2013, 8:12 PM
Ten Senators Sponsor Bill to Scrap Corn Ethanol Market Manipulation
December 13, 2013, 1:52 PM
China's Moon Rover Lands Safe and Sound, Starts Snapping Pics
December 16, 2013, 1:22 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Justice Leaks Details of Next HTC One Two Flagship Phone
Dec 5, 2013, 4:04 PM
Global Cyber Espionage Concerns Reveal Growing Cyber Armies
Nov 29, 2013, 11:04 AM
Is The Period Becoming an Expression of Anger?
Nov 26, 2013, 2:02 PM
NSA and Congress -- You Will Never Kill the Constitution, It's an Idea
Nov 10, 2013, 2:00 PM
AT&T Explores $100B+ USD Deal to Acquire Vodafone's European Operations
Nov 4, 2013, 7:34 AM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2013 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information