Report Details Tense CAFE Talks, White House Punts on Ethanol Requirements
August 13, 2012 9:13 AM
comment(s) - last by
Reduced corn production makes increased ethanol content in fuel worrisome
A new report has been published that looks at the tense negotiations between the White House and automakers over CAFE standards that would push fuel efficiency to 54.5 mpg by 2025. According to the report put together by the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, the Obama administration "openly played automakers off of each other to gain a tactical advantage over the industry."
"The inevitable product of this reckless process was a pair of rulemakings that reflect ideology over science and politics over process. … Americans will be forced to drive expensive, unpopular and unsafe automobiles mandated by the Obama administration," stated the report.
However, representative Elijah Cummings (D-Maryland), rejected the report stating, "Any allegations that the White House is seeking to weaken the auto industry are simply ridiculous — this is the White House that saved the auto industry from its near-collapse."
"Japan is angry. Feel like they have been screwed." -- Toyota
The report also features notes from auto manufacturers involved in the negotiation process with Washington. The notes show that foreign automakers particularly were unhappy with the process and felt that the rules were jilted in favor of Detroit automakers. Despite misgivings, most foreign automakers agreed to the deal. Handwritten notes in the report from Toyota stated, "Japan is angry. Feel like they have been screwed."
Automakers maintain that the
would add about $2,000 to the cost of the average vehicle by 2025 or roughly $3,000 when costs from the 2012 to 2013 fuel efficiency rules are figured in. Automakers felt pressure to agree to the Obama administration's fuel economy standards over fears that California would enact even stiffer efficiency ratings if they turned Washington down.
While fuel-efficiency standards are set to increase in the coming years, the White House is working hard to get more ethanol into the nation's fuel supply to help reduce the need for foreign oil. However, the U.S. is currently in the middle of a corn shortage. Ethanol in the U.S. is primarily produced using corn. Corn production in the U.S. has fallen drastically due to drought, and livestock producers fear that increasing the ethanol content in gasoline will result in even less corn being available feed, therefore, raising prices of feed and food supplies.
Severe drought conditions have obliterated this year's corn crop [Image Source: MSNBC]
The Detroit News
reports that over 180 members of Congress are calling on the Obama administration to waive increased ethanol requirements in fuel. White House spokesman Jay Carney said, "The EPA has made clear that they're working closely with the Department of Agriculture to keep an eye on yields, and they will evaluate all the relevant information when assessing that situation."
EPA spokeswoman Alisha Johnson said, "We are in close contact with USDA as they and we keep an eye on crop yield estimates, and we will review any data or information submitted by stakeholders, industry and states relating to the RFS program."
The Detroit News 
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: More exploitation and abuse of consumers
8/14/2012 12:43:27 PM
"Actually, no it doesn't, the profit motive on the other side of the transaction still exists- in their case to preserve profit. That is taken fully into account."
Spending as little as possible, preserving profit, whatever you want to call it - the buyer wants to spend as little as possible and the seller wants to gain as much as possible. If the 2 parties find a price agreeable to both, a deal can be made. For some reason, it is considered greedy that the seller wants to gain as much as possible but not greedy that the buyer wants to give as little as possible.
For certain services that are dominated by infrastructure costs, a monopoly system has evolved. Very few services fit this description, I think that you named both of them. Telephone used to be included, but obviously there are now many phone service options. Back when telephone was a monopoly, you even had to buy the phone itself from a company store, then there was deregulation and prices dropped and you can even buy a phone at any store now (if you still use a land line).
Eliminating the profit motive eliminates what drives further investment and focus on efficiency. This should be avoided to the maximum extent possible. When investment in businesses is voluntary, the business plan must be more solid than when the government wrenches taxpayers' money away and drops it on poor business plans.
You started with the argument that certain things are needed for the economy to run efficiently - power, oil, highways, food, national defense, open communication, and a legal framework to resolve disputes. I would argue that only national defense, and a legal framework are items where government should be involved. The others are already proof that the free market can provide these. For oil (gasoline?) and food, you have many options of types and brands available at many stores, all without some government mandate. What would a government-only food supply look like? What variety would you be able to get? We have plenty of open communications even despite government efforts to obstruct it. I also don't buy the suggestion that highways would not be built if not for the government.
"If you can find a PS3 anywhere in North America that's been on shelves for more than five minutes, I'll give you 1,200 bucks for it." -- SCEA President Jack Tretton
NADA: 54.5 MPG CAFE Proposal Could Tack Another $5,000 to New 2025 Model Prices
January 18, 2012, 10:03 AM
Report: Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communications Could Make New Cars, Trucks Costly
March 13, 2014, 7:19 PM
BMW: Demand for i8 Hybrid Sports Car Outpaces Production
March 13, 2014, 10:08 AM
Toyota's Takeshi Uchiyamada Says Hybrids Will Soon Have 20% Global Share
March 13, 2014, 9:24 AM
Tesla Loses Out in New Jersey's Vote for Direct Auto Sales Ban
March 12, 2014, 12:44 PM
Bids Sought to Build New Presidential Limo
March 12, 2014, 10:21 AM
Audi Traffic Light Recognition System Hopes to Save Fuel
March 11, 2014, 9:54 AM
Most Popular Articles
Malaysian Airlines Flight 370 Made Wild Altitude Changes
March 14, 2014, 9:21 PM
Tesla Motors Calls New Jersey Out on New Rule Against Its Direct Sales Model
March 11, 2014, 12:01 PM
Hack Reveals Fallen Bitcoin CEO's Posh Tokyo Penthouse
March 10, 2014, 4:28 PM
HTC One Leaks: LED Smart Cover, Carrier Models, Google Play Ed.
March 11, 2014, 5:30 PM
Apple Authorized to Seek $40 Per Device Against Samsung
March 13, 2014, 4:31 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Tesla vs. BMW: Who Has the Safer EV?
Feb 1, 2014, 2:56 PM
Justice Leaks Details of Next HTC One Two Flagship Phone
Dec 5, 2013, 4:04 PM
Global Cyber Espionage Concerns Reveal Growing Cyber Armies
Nov 29, 2013, 11:04 AM
Is The Period Becoming an Expression of Anger?
Nov 26, 2013, 2:02 PM
NSA and Congress -- You Will Never Kill the Constitution, It's an Idea
Nov 10, 2013, 2:00 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information