Print 51 comment(s) - last by YashBudini.. on Aug 16 at 5:45 PM

Reduced corn production makes increased ethanol content in fuel worrisome

A new report has been published that looks at the tense negotiations between the White House and automakers over CAFE standards that would push fuel efficiency to 54.5 mpg by 2025. According to the report put together by the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, the Obama administration "openly played automakers off of each other to gain a tactical advantage over the industry." 
"The inevitable product of this reckless process was a pair of rulemakings that reflect ideology over science and politics over process. … Americans will be forced to drive expensive, unpopular and unsafe automobiles mandated by the Obama administration," stated the report.
However, representative Elijah Cummings (D-Maryland), rejected the report stating, "Any allegations that the White House is seeking to weaken the auto industry are simply ridiculous — this is the White House that saved the auto industry from its near-collapse."

"Japan is angry. Feel like they have been screwed." -- Toyota
The report also features notes from auto manufacturers involved in the negotiation process with Washington. The notes show that foreign automakers particularly were unhappy with the process and felt that the rules were jilted in favor of Detroit automakers. Despite misgivings, most foreign automakers agreed to the deal. Handwritten notes in the report from Toyota stated, "Japan is angry. Feel like they have been screwed."
Automakers maintain that the new requirements would add about $2,000 to the cost of the average vehicle by 2025 or roughly $3,000 when costs from the 2012 to 2013 fuel efficiency rules are figured in. Automakers felt pressure to agree to the Obama administration's fuel economy standards over fears that California would enact even stiffer efficiency ratings if they turned Washington down.
While fuel-efficiency standards are set to increase in the coming years, the White House is working hard to get more ethanol into the nation's fuel supply to help reduce the need for foreign oil. However, the U.S. is currently in the middle of a corn shortage. Ethanol in the U.S. is primarily produced using corn. Corn production in the U.S. has fallen drastically due to drought, and livestock producers fear that increasing the ethanol content in gasoline will result in even less corn being available feed, therefore, raising prices of feed and food supplies.

Severe drought conditions have obliterated this year's corn crop [Image Source: MSNBC]
The Detroit News reports that over 180 members of Congress are calling on the Obama administration to waive increased ethanol requirements in fuel. White House spokesman Jay Carney said, "The EPA has made clear that they're working closely with the Department of Agriculture to keep an eye on yields, and they will evaluate all the relevant information when assessing that situation."
EPA spokeswoman Alisha Johnson said, "We are in close contact with USDA as they and we keep an eye on crop yield estimates, and we will review any data or information submitted by stakeholders, industry and states relating to the RFS program."

Sources: The Detroit News [1], [2]

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

The Democrat Way
By FITCamaro on 8/13/2012 10:41:50 AM , Rating: 4
Make them afraid to say no and everyone will always agree with you.

RE: The Democrat Way
By freedom4556 on 8/13/2012 11:05:55 AM , Rating: 4
It pisses me off that the Californians' Air Resources Board can stiff-arm the rest of the country with their hippie ways. Talk about domination by the minority. Didn't we sort out this whole 'states rights vs federalism' thing with a war?

RE: The Democrat Way
By kattanna on 8/13/2012 12:43:00 PM , Rating: 3
It pisses me off that the Californians' Air Resources Board can stiff-arm the rest of the country

besides cost.. there is nothing preventing the auto makers from making a car for CA, and another for the rest of the country.

but due to the free market, it just works out that way.

kinda like texas and school books

RE: The Democrat Way
By freedom4556 on 8/13/2012 2:28:14 PM , Rating: 2
there is nothing preventing the auto makers from making a car for CA

Except that many other states also adhere to CARB standards over and beyond the EPA. They're literally duplicating the EPA's purpose for auto emissions. The car makes are currently slinging it out in court over the constitutionality of this.

"States adopting the California standards include Arizona (2012 model year),[1] Connecticut, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New Mexico (2011 model year), New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington"

From Wiki

RE: The Democrat Way
By Ammohunt on 8/13/2012 2:36:21 PM , Rating: 3
I say let California have its tougher standards the way i figure it the auto makers have 49 other states they can sell cars to. The people of California can walk or use public transientation. That's if there are any people left in California by the time moonbeam is done with the place i.e. What happened in Detroit is happening to the entire state of California.

RE: The Democrat Way
By Ringold on 8/13/2012 2:50:11 PM , Rating: 3
What amuses me, or actually makes me sad, is that I run in to people that have moved away from California because its a wreck on so many levels -- and then vote for Democrats with the same sort of policies that created that wreck in the place they left. People get the government they deserve.

RE: The Democrat Way
By Ammohunt on 8/13/2012 3:28:50 PM , Rating: 2
This is why Colorado is a purple battle ground state...they f'ed up there state now they want to come here and do the same to us. If i could find a decent job i would move to Wyoming.

RE: The Democrat Way
By ClownPuncher on 8/13/2012 1:16:09 PM , Rating: 3
Which war? Our Civil war actually proved the opposite.

RE: The Democrat Way
By freedom4556 on 8/13/2012 2:17:50 PM , Rating: 2
Right, feds trump the states. CARP got special treatment because it predates the EPA. Not sure where the legal standing for that comes from

RE: The Democrat Way
By wookie1 on 8/13/2012 4:17:19 PM , Rating: 2
" feds trump the states"

Actually it's the other way around, except for those powers enumerated to the feds in the constitution, or those situations that can be associated with interstate commerce in any abstract way.

RE: The Democrat Way
By ClownPuncher on 8/13/2012 6:30:31 PM , Rating: 2
If only the Fed stuck to those rules every time.

RE: The Democrat Way
By Reclaimer77 on 8/13/2012 11:51:43 AM , Rating: 2
Al Capone would be proud. The Democrat party has become the biggest proponent of organized crime tactics since the 1930's. Intimidation, bribery, and downright dirty thuggery are the tools of the day.

RE: The Democrat Way
By nolisi on 8/13/12, Rating: -1
RE: The Democrat Way
By YashBudini on 8/16/2012 5:45:27 PM , Rating: 2
Make them afraid to say no and everyone will always agree with you.

A fine example of that was the 2004 presidential election.

"What would I do? I'd shut it down and give the money back to the shareholders." -- Michael Dell, after being asked what to do with Apple Computer in 1997

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki