backtop


Print 47 comment(s) - last by HrilL.. on Aug 14 at 1:25 PM

*While under computer control at least

Ever since Google launched its self-driving project back in 2010, the company has been working out the kinks with self-driving cars. The ultimate goal is to create technology that allows vehicles to drive passengers to any location without driver input. Google is testing fleet of these vehicles in Nevada and California, and has recently announced that its self-driving vehicles have accrued over 300,000 miles.
 
During those 300,000 miles, not one of the vehicles has been in an accident, at least not when under computer control (one Google self-driving automobile was involved in an accident while under human control).
 
When the project was initially launched two years ago, Google noted that 1.2 million lives were lost each year in traffic accidents and the search giant hoped to develop technologies to help reduce the number of traffic fatalities. The national average accident rate in 2009 within the United States worked out to about .366 per 100,000 vehicle miles driven.
 
Google has given its cars an edge on the accident front by operating them in environments that are easy to tackle. For instance, Google's automated fleet drives on mostly dry roads in moderate conditions. Google does want to begin testing its vehicles in harsher conditions, such as snow in the future.

 
Analyst Brian Walker Smith from Stanford Law School says that it is still much too early to say unequivocally that automated vehicles are safer than human driven vehicles. "Google's cars would need to drive themselves (by themselves) more than 725,000 representative miles without incident for us to say with 99 percent confidence that they crash less frequently than conventional cars,” Smith concluded. “If we look only at fatal crashes, this minimum skyrockets to 300 million miles."
 
Automated vehicle technology still has a long way to go to win approval with drivers and state and local authorities. So far, Utah is one of the few states to allow automated vehicles to drive on public roads.
 
While fully automated vehicles may be a long way away, many automakers are starting to integrate technologies that will automatically stop a vehicle when an impending accident is sensed. Cadillac has also unveiled technology that will steer a vehicle and operate the brakes and throttle in traffic.

Source: The Atlantic



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: I hope they make it
By Iaiken on 8/13/2012 12:48:24 PM , Rating: 2
Just because it's not for you or not for me doesn't mean self-driving cars are all for naught.

Would I buy one? Never! However, there are certain arenas where they would be hugely useful.

- taxi/shuttle service
- auto shares
- short-haul freight
- people who shouldn't/can't drive themselves

The last reason is actually the most compelling to me since eventually the laws will switch from needing a special license to have an automated car, to needing a special license to drive yourself. The only people driving themselves would be people who actually like to drive and are good at it.


RE: I hope they make it
By Reclaimer77 on 8/13/2012 1:00:18 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
The last reason is actually the most compelling to me since eventually the laws will switch from needing a special license to have an automated car, to needing a special license to drive yourself. The only people driving themselves would be people who actually like to drive and are good at it.


And that's how it starts folks...

I'm not surprised that YOU would favor discriminatory and arbitrary standards designed to marginalize those who decide to drive for themselves, but I'll have none of it.

I swear, you collectivists...


RE: I hope they make it
By senecarr on 8/13/2012 1:19:27 PM , Rating: 2
Because people that drive their own car now don't need a special license? Damn, what have I been doing waiting at the Secretary of State (your area might call it DMV) every few years? And then paying them on top of it.


RE: I hope they make it
By Reclaimer77 on 8/13/2012 1:29:28 PM , Rating: 2
Yes but it sounds like to me he wants lax standards for those who would let their car drive for them. Which is just a very BAD idea. We have to treat everyone equally and assure that everyone at least have a minimum of driver knowledge and ability, regardless of whatever technology might be in their vehicle.


RE: I hope they make it
By Helbore on 8/13/2012 1:46:19 PM , Rating: 2
So everyone should only be licensed to drive a manual car right now, right? No more automatic licenses for those who don't like gear shifts.


RE: I hope they make it
By Reclaimer77 on 8/13/2012 1:52:39 PM , Rating: 2
Where did I say that? Wtf are you even talking about? Reading comprehension isn't your friend apparently.


RE: I hope they make it
By foolsgambit11 on 8/13/2012 2:20:31 PM , Rating: 2
Let's put it this way: should everyone be required to take their driving test on a manual transmission with no power steering or power brakes?

To use an analogy, driving by hand would be like being an EMT, while the training the average car owner would get would be more like a Red Cross First Aid course. Prepared to handle exigencies, but not fully versed in the minutiae.


RE: I hope they make it
By Reclaimer77 on 8/13/2012 2:22:27 PM , Rating: 2
There's a HUGE difference between those transmissions, and not driving at ALL. And you know it.

Come on, enough with the silliness. You're not going to get away with not taking a driving test because under some circumstances your car might be able to drive itself. That's silliness.


RE: I hope they make it
By ArcliteHawaii on 8/13/2012 6:20:41 PM , Rating: 2
I'm sure your ability to drive yourself isn't in danger of being affected for the next 30 years or so. However, once self driving cars are mainstream and statistically proven to be less accident prone than humans, human driving will become more regulated and more expensive. It may take a couple of decades to get the technology right, but I think it's a forgone conclusion a computer will be a superior driver than a human given that it will have 360 vision, faster reaction times, can be programmed for the correct avoidance response for multiple incoming vectors, never gets drunk or sleepy, etc. etc. The government will probably mandate that most mass produced cars at least have the option for self driving, even if they are capable of manual driving. And insurance companies will increase your car insurance if you choose to drive yourself, or may even refuse to cover you at all like some housing insurance refuses to cover houses in flood zones for example since they are too high risk.


RE: I hope they make it
By Reclaimer77 on 8/13/2012 7:17:35 PM , Rating: 2
Exactly!

The scenario you describe is a literal nightmare. What a horrible horrible future to have to live in. You're talking yet another massive blow to freedom and liberty, courtesy of Government mandates.

Anyone who thinks that's an ideal situation is a seriously mentally disturbed person. We'll just have to hope that something drastic happens to prevent the travesty.


RE: I hope they make it
By Iaiken on 8/14/2012 11:34:19 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
You're talking yet another massive blow to freedom and liberty, courtesy of Government mandates.


You don't even need the government mandate for that to happen, market forces will make it happen as insurance companies will eventually either refuse to insure human drivers, or charge them such ridiculous rates that only the rich could afford it.


RE: I hope they make it
By Helbore on 8/13/2012 2:33:06 PM , Rating: 2
Manners really aren't your thing, are they?

You can already get different classes of licenses for different types of vehicles. Vehicle licensing isn't on an even footing at the moment.


RE: I hope they make it
By Iaiken on 8/13/2012 3:40:38 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
I'm not surprised that YOU would favor discriminatory and arbitrary standards designed to marginalize those who decide to drive for themselves, but I'll have none of it.


The comprehension is not strong with this one...

YOU already need a special license to drive for yourself.

Do you feel marginalized now? The difference between the two licenses in the future is that one needn't be predicated upon the other license to get the other.

You may return to your regularly scheduled freak-out...


"Folks that want porn can buy an Android phone." -- Steve Jobs

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki