Following Defeat, Obama to Reportedly Push Cybersecurity Bill With Executive Orders
August 7, 2012 7:26 PM
comment(s) - last by
Checks and balances? What checks and balances?
America's government is a carefully crafted system of checks and balances, as laid out by the Constitution -- well, in theory at least. However, in recent decades, the executive branch has tended to do what it wants while the grumbling legislation is placated by piles of
for their campaign donors and
special interest handouts
for key local constituents.
I. Cybersecurity Bill - Down, But Not Out
Take the "Cybersecurity Act", bill,
[PDF], for example. A redraft of earlier House bill
, the Act gained the support of the President by modifying its proposed implementation to include funneling more of Americans' private data through the increasingly Big Brother-esque
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
While the President
by the promise of the DHS gaining more access in the name of fighting a shadowy,
vague Chinese threat
, privacy advocates and fiscal conservatives were
horrified by the bill
Rep. Ron Paul
the bill "Big Brother writ large."
The bill also stalled in the Senate thanks to growing concern from the corporate community, who urged their affiliated Republican Senators to move to block the bill. Business leaders supported some of the provisions that would tear down legal barriers between government and private sector information sharing. But they balked at the proposal of mandatory security guidelines -- another key part of the bill.
Well, bill or no bill the Obama administration is confident they can put the policies in place. The key to subverting the stubborn legislature, argues administration officials is to substitute executive orders in the place of Senate votes.
President Obama hopes to use executive orders to expand the DHS's cybersecurity role.
[Image Source: CyTalk]
White House press secretary Jay Carney says that executive orders have not been ruled out, assuming the Senate continues its freeze on the bill. He comments, "In the wake of Congressional inaction and Republican stall tactics, unfortunately, we will continue to be hamstrung by outdated and inadequate statutory authorities that the legislation would have fixed."
Obama's slogan on this and other issues is "we can't wait."
II. Continuing the FDR Legacy
Indeed the White House will likely move aggressively to put in place executive orders with agencies such as the
U.S. Federal Communications Commission
U.S. Department of Defense
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
, and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to put in place systems forcing businesses to meet security screening.
Even the prohibition on sharing consumer information with the DHS may be able to be torn down by executive order. By making the program "voluntary" with incentives, the White House could circumvent laws prohibiting the executive branch from forcing unwanted, unlegislated regulation on businesses.
If President Obama does choose to bypass Congress, the approach may draw criticism. Senator
(R- Maine) -- one of the co-sponsors of the bill -- said she would not be comfortable with that approach, despite her support for the provisions. She comments, "I'm not for doing by executive order what should be done by legislation."
One of the Democratic co-sponsors -- Senator
(D-Calif.) -- seemed okay with the idea, though. Asked if she would approve of executive orders as a substitute, she said, "I suppose if we can't [pass the bill], the answer would be yes."
Here's a quick rundown on recent President's use of the executive order [
[Image Source: Jason Mick/DailyTech]
Of course these recent numbers pale in comparison to President Franklin D. Roosevelt, who put in place 3,467 orders during his twelve years in office. He may have propelled the nation out of a depression, but he set a costly precedent with those orders, one that his successors have followed -- to a lesser extent -- to this day.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: I fear for the future...
8/8/2012 3:50:10 AM
Because your sound every bit like a dictator.
In your mind, it's the poor that have caused the issues.
Not the politicians, and their corrupt friends in high places and with wealth.
No, hammer the poor, free the rich.
RE: I fear for the future...
8/8/2012 11:25:57 AM
In my mind, EVERYONE is accountable. Yes, the rich should pay more taxes. No, I don't care about their whining about why that would be a bad idea. Guards should be in place to keep them from utilizing their wealth in abusive ways. Our system of justice in particular needs a serious revamp to minimize the huge benefit wealth provides in a court.
On the flip side, welfare should only ever be a temporary thing, to help people get on their feet (or back on their feet). Permanent welfare means you are a permanent leech on society. I don't really care about leeches, or what happens to them. Cut 'em off, and let them deal with the consequences.
And frankly, NOBODY should be having 30 children. Sorry, but that's just ridiculous. If you aren't responsible enough to see and understand that, you aren't responsible enough to have control over your own life. I don't even really care if you are a billionaire that can afford 30 children with zero aid from the government. There's no way two parents can give 30 children all the attention each of them deserve from their parents. Farming them out to hired nannies is just another form of irresponsible parenting.
In summary, neither the Democrats nor the Republicans are what's needed to fix this country. What's truly needed is a sane, rational leader that doesn't care about party lines and agendas or campaign contributors agendas. The sad part is, our political system essentially makes it impossible for such a person to get elected. In other words, we're fucked.
"Spreading the rumors, it's very easy because the people who write about Apple want that story, and you can claim its credible because you spoke to someone at Apple." -- Investment guru Jim Cramer
President Obama Scolds Businesses, Urges Passage of Cybersecurity Act
July 20, 2012, 5:16 PM
Ron Paul, President Obama in Opposition of Cybersecurity Bill
April 26, 2012, 2:44 PM
NSA: China is Destroying U.S. Economy Via Security Hacks
March 28, 2012, 7:06 PM
Report: Anti-Streaming Lobbyists Paid Off Senators Handsomely
June 18, 2011, 3:50 PM
GE: $14B USD Profits, Pays No Taxes For Last Year, Gets $3.2B Tax Benefit
March 25, 2011, 3:22 PM
Report: AT&T Eyeing $40B DirecTV Purchase
May 1, 2014, 8:00 AM
WebOS Class Action Settlement Costs HP $57 Million
April 1, 2014, 10:22 AM
IBM Workers Strike Over Terms of Deal That Will Have Them Working for Lenovo
March 6, 2014, 9:29 AM
Google Picking Up Artificial Intelligence Company "DeepMind" for $400 Million
January 27, 2014, 9:25 AM
Quick Note: Qualcomm Grabs up Palm, IPAQ, and Bitfone Patent Portfolio from HP
January 24, 2014, 9:18 AM
Verizon Buys Intel Media OnCue Cloud TV assets
January 21, 2014, 10:26 AM
Most Popular Articles
Apple's iPhone, iPad Update iOS 7.1.2 is Badly Broken for Some
July 8, 2014, 2:00 PM
Despite Legal Threats Google Begins Posting Warnings of ISP Throttling
July 7, 2014, 5:52 PM
Buzz Aldrin Says First Astronauts to Set Foot on Mars Should Never Return Home
July 9, 2014, 9:46 AM
Your Uncharged Smartphone, Tablet May Prevent You from Boarding U.S.-bound Flights
July 6, 2014, 11:11 PM
Samsung Sales, Profit Drops in Q2, Apple Sees Troubling Signs Too
July 8, 2014, 8:18 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Space Terrorism is a Looming Threat For the United States
Apr 23, 2014, 7:47 PM
Facebook Aims to Provide Internet to "Every Person in the World" with Drones, Satellites
Apr 1, 2014, 10:20 AM
Retail Mobile Sites Experience Outages in Light of Simplexity's Bankruptcy
Mar 14, 2014, 8:48 AM
Tesla vs. BMW: Who Has the Safer EV?
Feb 1, 2014, 2:56 PM
Justice Leaks Details of Next HTC One Two Flagship Phone
Dec 5, 2013, 4:04 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information