TSA Refuses to Hold Public Hearings on Nude Scanners, Court Chimes In
August 2, 2012 10:45 AM
comment(s) - last by
Court demands to know why TSA is brazenly violating federal laws and its orders
We've covered over the past few years how the
U.S. Transportation Safety Agency
's "nude" full-body scanners
have been used
. The TSA has received sweeping condemnation for the Orwellian scanner program, which many experts say
cannot detect dangerous materials
as well as
metal detectors or traditional search techniques
A handful of high-profile civil liberties watchdog organizations have targeted the deployment. Perhaps the most successful was the
Electronic Privacy Information Center
(EPIC) lawsuit against the TSA. While EPIC fell short of felling the nude scanners on Constitutional grounds, it did score a victory of sorts when the
U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
found the TSA violated a federal transparency law.
The court on July 15, 2011 ordered the TSA "to act properly" and rectify its breach of the
Administrative Procedures Act
(APA) of 1946, which requires federal programs to hold public hearings. The TSA held no such hearings with regards to the court scanners, so three judge appellate panel
ordered the agency
[PDF] to undergo a 90-day public comment period.
The TSA has defied a court order to hold a public review its "nude" full-body scanners.
[Image Source: TSA]
So what’s problem? The TSA never complied with the court order. As of last month, it told
that the hearing and policy review had been shelved until sometime "next year". The TSA has stated it really doesn't want to hold the public review at all, as it feels it could harm the government's capability to respond to "ever-evolving threats."
That defiant stance landed the TSA back in court this week. In a
[PDF] the federal court reiterated its demand for hearings, ordering the TSA to respond by Aug. 30.
Jim Harper, the director of information policy studies at the
an active petition
on the new White House petition site rolled out by the Obama administration. The petition demands the TSA follow the law and hold the public hearings. The petition has almost 16,500 signatures and only needs about 8,500 more to reach its goal of 25,000. Under the rules of the petition site, if the additional signature mark is met, President Barack Obama must personally respond.
A petition hopes to get President Obama to force the TSA to follow the law.
It's understandable why the TSA wouldn't want to have to answer tough questions from the public on
health risks to frequent fliers
and why the TSA was
storing nude body scanner images
, after it had promised not to.
However, even considering the controversy, it's in the relative minority. Agencies like the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
have complied with the APA rules, offering public reviews of contentious provisions such as the
CAFE (corporate average fuel economy) standards
U.S. District Court for D.C. via Wired
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
Why does it seem lately
8/2/2012 6:24:29 PM
Why does it seem lately that the Executive branch does not feel it has to obey anything coming from either the Judicial or Legislative branch?
Unless things have changed since I had Civics in high school, the Legislative branch is responsible for creating the laws, the Judicial branch is responsible for reviewing the laws and interpreting them based on the Constitution, and the Executive branch is responsible for enforcing the laws written by the Legislative branch and approved by the Judicial branch.
The Executive branch is not there to make their own laws, or to re-interpret the current laws to make them fit how they want them to work. Just as with how the Executive branch is redefining what "work" is as it was set out in the previous Welfare Reform Act where "work" was clearly defined in the legislation. Now the Executive branch has put out decrees that even things like "bed rest" are to be counted as work to qualify people for welfare to whom the work requirement pertains. Same thing here with the TSA not following through on obeying the laws even after the Judicial branch has ruled they must. Seems our system of checks and balances is being ignored quite blatantly.
RE: Why does it seem lately
8/3/2012 11:30:25 AM
The last statement you made was very important. The PotUS isn't all that incredibly powerful, regardless of what those who picked the other guy (in every election not limited to current administration) would have you believe. I've had a government class a lot more recently than high school and it takes a lot of effort to effect real change that sticks. The President can deploy the military for a limited amount of time, and that is pretty powerful, but even that power can be overturned by the legislative branch. It takes the legislative branch being lazy, and not standing up to the president for this stupid shit to happen. That is precisely why your last statement is so important. The checks and balances aren't working because no one is standing up.
If you think this is limited to either of the major parties, you've lost the argument already. Each and every politician seems to be trying to watch his ass and not stand out, I think the only chance we have is for some truly concerned citizens to get involved in national politics. But everyone is gonna hate you no matter how well you are doing, so no one but the wrong people tend to want to get involved. I've seen great people in local politics though, that do stand up to bullshit. This system can work but not with the media that exists today. Foxnews or any of the other side news will bury you in bullshit before you've even had a chance.
"So if you want to save the planet, feel free to drive your Hummer. Just avoid the drive thru line at McDonalds." -- Michael Asher
Report: Ford's Best-Selling F-150 to Lose 700 lbs to Meet EPA Fuel Standards
July 27, 2012, 8:34 AM
Anonymous Reeling From Betrayal, Launches Retaliation
March 9, 2012, 8:42 AM
TSA Worker Assaults Boss After Body Scanner Reveals Genitalia
May 7, 2010, 1:50 PM
DHS Begins Mass Rollout of Airport Scanners Despite Health, Privacy Risks
March 8, 2010, 10:30 AM
Britain Embraces Controversial Scanners, Implements "No Scan, No Fly" Policy
February 2, 2010, 10:01 AM
Airbus Shows Off All-Electric E-Fan 2.0 Airplane, Plans Production in 2017
July 21, 2014, 9:29 AM
Buzz Aldrin Says First Astronauts to Set Foot on Mars Should Never Return Home
July 9, 2014, 9:46 AM
Women May Soon Be Able to Control Their Fertility via Remote Control
July 7, 2014, 10:14 AM
Tiny "Bio-bots" Powered by Muscle Cells, Electrical Pulses
July 3, 2014, 7:00 PM
Boston Using Solar-Powered Benches as Phone Charging Stations
July 1, 2014, 1:09 PM
Hobby Lobby Ruling Raises Question -- Can Religious Doctors Deny Transfusions?
June 30, 2014, 7:57 PM
Most Popular Articles
Quick Note: Nokia Devices Now Receiving Windows Phone 8.1 Update
July 15, 2014, 10:42 AM
Microsoft Kills Entertainment Unit, May Shelve Flagship Lumia "McLaren"
July 18, 2014, 7:40 PM
Boeing 777 Malaysian Airlines Flight 17 Crashes in Ukraine
July 17, 2014, 1:00 PM
Tesla Confirms “Model III” EV with 200+ Mile Range, Blames Ford for Missed "SEX"
July 15, 2014, 9:12 PM
FBI Report Suggests That Self-Driving Cars Could Be Used as Rolling Bombs
July 16, 2014, 11:02 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Space Terrorism is a Looming Threat For the United States
Apr 23, 2014, 7:47 PM
Facebook Aims to Provide Internet to "Every Person in the World" with Drones, Satellites
Apr 1, 2014, 10:20 AM
Retail Mobile Sites Experience Outages in Light of Simplexity's Bankruptcy
Mar 14, 2014, 8:48 AM
Tesla vs. BMW: Who Has the Safer EV?
Feb 1, 2014, 2:56 PM
Justice Leaks Details of Next HTC One Two Flagship Phone
Dec 5, 2013, 4:04 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information