backtop


Print 94 comment(s) - last by Netjak.. on Aug 6 at 5:20 AM

Court demands to know why TSA is brazenly violating federal laws and its orders

We've covered over the past few years how the U.S. Transportation Safety Agency's "nude" full-body scanners have been used and abused.  The TSA has received sweeping condemnation for the Orwellian scanner program, which many experts say cannot detect dangerous materials as well as metal detectors or traditional search techniques.

A handful of high-profile civil liberties watchdog organizations have targeted the deployment.  Perhaps the most successful was the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) lawsuit against the TSA.  While EPIC fell short of felling the nude scanners on Constitutional grounds, it did score a victory of sorts when the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit found the TSA violated a federal transparency law.

The court on July 15, 2011 ordered the TSA "to act properly" and rectify its breach of the Administrative Procedures Act (APA) of 1946, which requires federal programs to hold public hearings.  The TSA held no such hearings with regards to the court scanners, so three judge appellate panel ordered the agency [PDF] to undergo a 90-day public comment period.

Body scanner images
The TSA has defied a court order to hold a public review its "nude" full-body scanners.
[Image Source: TSA]

So what’s problem?  The TSA never complied with the court order.  As of last month, it told Wired in an interview that the hearing and policy review had been shelved until sometime "next year".  The TSA has stated it really doesn't want to hold the public review at all, as it feels it could harm the government's capability to respond to "ever-evolving threats."

That defiant stance landed the TSA back in court this week.  In a short ruling [PDF] the federal court reiterated its demand for hearings, ordering the TSA to respond by Aug. 30.

Jim Harper, the director of information policy studies at the Cato Institute, has an active petition on the new White House petition site rolled out by the Obama administration.  The petition demands the TSA follow the law and hold the public hearings.  The petition has almost 16,500 signatures and only needs about 8,500 more to reach its goal of 25,000.  Under the rules of the petition site, if the additional signature mark is met, President Barack Obama must personally respond.
 
TSA petition
A petition hopes to get President Obama to force the TSA to follow the law.

It's understandable why the TSA wouldn't want to have to answer tough questions from the public on health risks to frequent fliers and why the TSA was storing nude body scanner images, after it had promised not to.

However, even considering the controversy, it's in the relative minority.  Agencies like the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency have complied with the APA rules, offering public reviews of contentious provisions such as the CAFE (corporate average fuel economy) standards.

Sources: U.S. District Court for D.C. via Wired, Wired



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: The TSA is useless
By Manch on 8/2/2012 6:07:25 PM , Rating: 0
Who the Fuc are these terrorists in these scenarios everyone keeps bringing up? Are they Camel Jockey versions of the Navy Seals? Were they trained by Jackie Chan and Bruce Leroy? Did use to be partners with Higgs? They teach John McClain how to Die Hard? Seriously? a plane of lets say 125 people, not one or a dozen can take em out?

quote:
They only need too shoot down one person, and all the rest will stay quiet.


Flight 93 would beg to differ. God bless em.

quote:
Take for instance bank robberies: how many have you heard of that the average person in line fought back, disarmed the criminals and took care of the situation?


Well, since they're their for the money and not turning your plane into a missile, your analogy is a bit off. With a bank robbery, you can stfu and live.

Which would you choose?

#1 terrorist fucktards take over plane to turn it into a missile.

Do nothing=die
Do something=die or live

#2 Robbers enter a bank, fire a couple shots into the air and tell everyone to get on the floor. They proceed to rob the bank

Do nothing=live
Do something=live or die

#3 Woman is getting attacked by guy with a gun. Hes gonna kill her

Do nothing=you live, she dies
Do something=you live, she lives, he dies, or any combination of the three

I think your confusing peoples willingness to help someone in trouble and put themselves in danger vs self preservation.


"A lot of people pay zero for the cellphone ... That's what it's worth." -- Apple Chief Operating Officer Timothy Cook














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki