backtop


Print 94 comment(s) - last by Netjak.. on Aug 6 at 5:20 AM

Court demands to know why TSA is brazenly violating federal laws and its orders

We've covered over the past few years how the U.S. Transportation Safety Agency's "nude" full-body scanners have been used and abused.  The TSA has received sweeping condemnation for the Orwellian scanner program, which many experts say cannot detect dangerous materials as well as metal detectors or traditional search techniques.

A handful of high-profile civil liberties watchdog organizations have targeted the deployment.  Perhaps the most successful was the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) lawsuit against the TSA.  While EPIC fell short of felling the nude scanners on Constitutional grounds, it did score a victory of sorts when the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit found the TSA violated a federal transparency law.

The court on July 15, 2011 ordered the TSA "to act properly" and rectify its breach of the Administrative Procedures Act (APA) of 1946, which requires federal programs to hold public hearings.  The TSA held no such hearings with regards to the court scanners, so three judge appellate panel ordered the agency [PDF] to undergo a 90-day public comment period.

Body scanner images
The TSA has defied a court order to hold a public review its "nude" full-body scanners.
[Image Source: TSA]

So what’s problem?  The TSA never complied with the court order.  As of last month, it told Wired in an interview that the hearing and policy review had been shelved until sometime "next year".  The TSA has stated it really doesn't want to hold the public review at all, as it feels it could harm the government's capability to respond to "ever-evolving threats."

That defiant stance landed the TSA back in court this week.  In a short ruling [PDF] the federal court reiterated its demand for hearings, ordering the TSA to respond by Aug. 30.

Jim Harper, the director of information policy studies at the Cato Institute, has an active petition on the new White House petition site rolled out by the Obama administration.  The petition demands the TSA follow the law and hold the public hearings.  The petition has almost 16,500 signatures and only needs about 8,500 more to reach its goal of 25,000.  Under the rules of the petition site, if the additional signature mark is met, President Barack Obama must personally respond.
 
TSA petition
A petition hopes to get President Obama to force the TSA to follow the law.

It's understandable why the TSA wouldn't want to have to answer tough questions from the public on health risks to frequent fliers and why the TSA was storing nude body scanner images, after it had promised not to.

However, even considering the controversy, it's in the relative minority.  Agencies like the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency have complied with the APA rules, offering public reviews of contentious provisions such as the CAFE (corporate average fuel economy) standards.

Sources: U.S. District Court for D.C. via Wired, Wired



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: The TSA is useless
By nolisi on 8/2/2012 12:56:33 PM , Rating: 2
Wow, those are pretty precise numbers- you've seen this happen before?

Dude- just because you can get a license and go to a firing range doesn't mean you have perfect situational awareness, judgement and aim. A few people on the plane might be highly skilled at best, the rest will probably be mediocre at best. The hull of the plane will also likely get shot multiple times from multiple directions as well from those thinking "I got this."

Who knows, in that situation, someone might take the opportunity to shoot a flight attendant because of a missed connection earlier in their travel.


RE: The TSA is useless
By MrBungle123 on 8/2/2012 1:07:31 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Dude- just because you can get a license and go to a firing range doesn't mean you have perfect situational awareness, judgement and aim.


yup, you're absolutely right.

quote:
The hull of the plane will also likely get shot multiple times from multiple directions as well from those thinking "I got this."


So? Aircraft are designed to handle things like the exterior doors coming off or punctures to the fuselage. The pilot will have to drop to 10,000 feet (so the people don't pass out) and fly to the nearest airport. You've watched snakes on a plane a few too many times if you think a couple pistol rounds is going to tear a giant hole in the side of the plane and cause massive structural failues leading to the plane falling out of the sky.


RE: The TSA is useless
By retrospooty on 8/2/2012 1:22:47 PM , Rating: 2
I am going to go out on a limb and guess that you have absolutely zero experience in either law enforcement, or security... Or airlines.


RE: The TSA is useless
By Ringold on 8/2/2012 2:14:20 PM , Rating: 2
One point is valid: a handful of bullet holes isn't going to cause a crash, unless the pilots are incompetent or the airframe hadn't been properly maintained. If aircraft were delicate little butterflies there'd be a lot more aviation disasters.

Further, and maybe I just missed it, but you're all forgetting one obvious fact: special ammunition designed to minimize airframe damage is already used by air marshalls, and could just as easily be used by flight crew.

I have to agree that there's a small number of places where an armed populace might be more risk then its worth. 99% of places are not among them, but the inside of a plane... Most gun owners just don't put that much practice in at a range.


RE: The TSA is useless
By Reclaimer77 on 8/2/2012 2:59:32 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
One point is valid: a handful of bullet holes isn't going to cause a crash, unless the pilots are incompetent or the airframe hadn't been properly maintained. If aircraft were delicate little butterflies there'd be a lot more aviation disasters.


Okay I just need to educate some people here about something: defense ammunition.

Over-penetration is a big concern to those of us who carry concealed defense weapons. The absolute last thing you want to have happen, is a round pass through someone and injure an innocent person or cause any collateral damage. Which is why we carry "hollowpoints" and other types of ammunition designed to fragment or mushroom on impact and remain inside the body while causing maximum damage.

I think it's highly unlikely you would see Hollywood style "holes" being drilled through an aircraft from the typical defensive ammunition fired from concealed handguns, which typically only have 2.5"-4" barrels.


RE: The TSA is useless
By JediJeb on 8/2/2012 2:03:39 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
So? Aircraft are designed to handle things like the exterior doors coming off or punctures to the fuselage. The pilot will have to drop to 10,000 feet (so the people don't pass out) and fly to the nearest airport. You've watched snakes on a plane a few too many times if you think a couple pistol rounds is going to tear a giant hole in the side of the plane and cause massive structural failues leading to the plane falling out of the sky.


This part is true. They even tried it on a Mythbuster's episode once (yea not the most definitive source but still). Even blowing out a whole window does not suck people out of the plane. Once you decompress in a couple seconds you just have the wind to contend with as it passes by the opening. Even that Hawaiian airlines plane that lost a big section of its upper hull only lost the flight attendant that happened to be standing in that area, and the plane still landed safely.

As far as having everyone armed, no, there are many people who just shouldn't be trying that. I am not for taking away any rights to have guns, but people need to be knowledgeable of their limitations in certain circumstances. I am however in favor of armed crews if they are properly trained.


RE: The TSA is useless
By sviola on 8/2/2012 2:14:38 PM , Rating: 2
The problem with the "everyone has a gun in the plane" scenario is that terrorists will have them too. And when a shootout on a confined environment happens, lots of people will die/be injured, including pilots.


RE: The TSA is useless
By MrBungle123 on 8/2/2012 2:24:41 PM , Rating: 1
If terrorists are on the plane then every other security measure has failed and the only thing you have left is you and the people around you for defense. An armed flight crew and passengers is not an easy target for a hand full of terrorists.


RE: The TSA is useless
By retrospooty on 8/2/2012 2:39:07 PM , Rating: 2
"If terrorists are on the plane then every other security measure has failed and the only thing you have left is you and the people around you for defense."

What you keep missing is causaity. As it is now, Terrorists cant get on a plane with a Weapon. If you arm the flight crew, Terrorosts CAN be on a plane with a weapon.

I am not at all against guns, I fully support the right to bear arms. "Guns dont kill people, people do" etc etc... I have no problem with any of that, but not on a plane, simply because it will cause the very problem it is designed to eliminate.


RE: The TSA is useless
By retrospooty on 8/2/2012 2:49:27 PM , Rating: 2
damn, I cant type today... "causality".


RE: The TSA is useless
By MrBungle123 on 8/2/2012 11:11:02 PM , Rating: 2
If that argument held water gun shows would be the most prevalent terrorist target of all... Think about it, a 1000 people all crammed into the same building tightly grouped around displays, and guns (the root cause of terrorism) everywhere... the perfect terrorist target... except half the people are gun enthusiasts and are probably packing and you would have to defend against an army of armed *gasp* civilians as soon as you tried anything stupid.


RE: The TSA is useless
By Reclaimer77 on 8/2/2012 2:28:13 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Dude- just because you can get a license and go to a firing range doesn't mean you have perfect situational awareness, judgement and aim.


And just because some criminal buys a gun doesn't mean he has perfect situational awareness, judgment, and aim either.

quote:
The hull of the plane will also likely get shot multiple times from multiple directions as well from those thinking "I got this."


So if you have a chance to protect yourself, or sit there and watch terrorist fly your plane into a building, the consequences of what "might" happen outweighs survival. Brilliant logic.

It's obvious you don't know a damn thing about legally owning a gun, concealed carry permits, or anything related to the topic. The FIRST thing you learn is to never pull the trigger unless you're absolutely certain it's a safe shot, and the target will be hit.

As a legal gun owner and avid shooter, and concealed carry holder, I find your mis-characterization of us very offensive and grounded in ignorance.

quote:
Who knows, in that situation, someone might take the opportunity to shoot a flight attendant because of a missed connection earlier in their travel.


....

This is just beyond offensive and inflammatory.


RE: The TSA is useless
By webstorm1 on 8/3/2012 10:59:05 AM , Rating: 2
I tend to agree that most of the type of people with the wherewithal to get a CCW are probably those that have respect for firearms. Movies have skewed perception of firearms pretty badly. It's a whole lot easier to miss than it is to hit. That's why your run of the mill thug gets taken out without injuring law enforcement in most cases. If you are holding your gun sideways, you are going to miss and possibly hurt your wrist.

I don't buy any of the rhetoric from either camp about guns, but I do believe that an overwhelming majority of gun owners are the safest people with those guns. The crazy we just had went out and bought some guns off the shelf and had no training- a well trained civilian in the right place could have easily subdued him. A chance would have been better than no chance. As long as people are free to move about the country there exists the possibility of mass murder, and if I happen to find myself in a situation I will be grateful for the armed civilians around me. I will be teaching my children about gun safety as soon as they are old enough to learn. I don't agree with Reclaimer on much, but I do agree on this topic. Even though he thinks you are a crazy left winger he wouldn't ever pull his weapon on you, even as a joke.

It is ridiculous to assert someone might try to murder a flight attendant for revenge. If that were a real concern we'd have a lot less aholes in this world for fear of retribution. You can't even punch a jerk in the face these days.


RE: The TSA is useless
By Netjak on 8/6/2012 5:20:33 AM , Rating: 1
Arms for safety? On battle field, yes. But on the streets - no. unarmed man can not easily kill; armed man can do that by accident. why? because it is to easy to pull the triger, even a todler can do that. Go to for clues; see UK, Germany, Japan... there is five or more times less murders per capita than in US.


"My sex life is pretty good" -- Steve Jobs' random musings during the 2010 D8 conference














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki