Ubisoft Caught Installing Exploitable DRM Plug-in on Users' Machines
July 30, 2012 11:44 AM
comment(s) - last by
Assasin's Creed installs dangerous software -- can we say "class action lawsuit"?
Google, Inc. (
) engineer Tavis Ormandy has created a world of woe for French
software giant Ubisoft
Entertainment S.A. (
) after he
that the company was endangering customers by installing dangerous software that opened a back-door to their machines.
Ubisoft is well known for its
franchises, as well as a number of Tom Clancy titles (e.g. the
series). But according to Mr. Ormandy, Ubisoft's recent software comes with a dangerous attachment -- a browser plugin designed to support the company's secured Uplay service.
The browser plug-in acts as an accidental Trojan, allows arbitrary code execution via the opened "door" inside the affected browser. Ubisoft uses the plugin to check if the installed title is valid, allowing gamers access to online play and achievements. But according to Mr. Ormandy hackers could also exploit the open door in escalation of privileges attacks on the users' machine.
Hundreds of thousands of PC gamers are believed to be affected.
Ubisoft Uplay browser plugin allowed unauthorized acceess to users' machines.
[Image Source: Geek.com]
Affected titles include 5
games, as well as popular titles such as
Driver: San Francisco
. Mr. Ormandy first observed the exploitable plug-in while installing
Assassin's Creed: Revelations
The exploitable plug-in came with installs of Assassin's Creed titles. [Image Source: IGN]
Ubisoft had already upset customers with its DRM scheme, as many complained that they had legitimately purchased titles, but were being locked out of gameplay when their machines were offline. Ubisoft defended this policy.
Now it may be forced to defend itself in court against class action lawsuits for endangering its loyal customers.
The incident is eerily reminiscent to the rootkit discovered on Sony Corp. (
) music CDs several years ago. Sony was
subsequently sued and forced into an apology/settlement
for recklessly endangering its users.
As the plug-in does not mask its presence, in its current form it is closer to an exploitable plug-in aka. an accidental Trojan than a rootkit by definition, hence the text was changed to correct this.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: DRM should be illegal
7/31/2012 12:52:51 PM
Seriously? All software should simply be open source because essentially profit and software do not go hand in hand?
I have to say I can't disagree more with your opinion (to which you are entitled). I too am a developer and luckily we do not face any real piracy as we have a niche group of customers. So for that, I am thankful... because IF we did, almost surely jobs would be lost.
The thought that someone would invest time and money into something that (if I understand you correctly) essentially returns no profits just isn't sensible from a real life practicality point of view.
You're also assessing the current pay model with manufacturing which in itself is not a good comparison. Maybe we should measure the benefits received as a result of the contribution of the developers/business? If you don't want to pay for it, you must not need it. Or, if you do, why shouldn't the developers/business be rewarded?
Because it doesn't cost to replicate? It actually does almost always cost because ultimately someone needs to be funded to write it anyways.
Idk, I'm not disrespecting your opinion, and I get your basis (I like to play devils advocate and have used that very same arguement to argue the point you are, except it was movies and music) I just don't agree with it at the end of the day.
Because a bueinss model can be more efficient or isn't restricted to the physical contraints of material objects manufactured and sold doesn't invalidate its value. It does not imply it should be free unless the authors/owners decide they want to give it away. We have the right NOT to pay for it and not use. To not pay for it AND circumvent what has been implemented to protect their investment is frankly what is wrong IMO. Not that I agree with those implementations being invasive (like rootkits, which it turns out this is not) but I totally would secure my investment. You'd be foolish not to. It's about profits, not charity (most of the time)
RE: DRM should be illegal
7/31/2012 3:58:54 PM
I think a big part of the problem in general is that people do not think of digital goods the same as they do physical. Because it can be copied 100% with the push of a button, suddenly it seems as if it took no work to create and its not harming anyone if you just take it. A very small percentage of people in the first world would even steal a candy bar from a grocery store, but a very large percentage of them have, would, and do steal digital goods. Its a dangerous attitude that could ultimately lead to complete devaluation of all art forms that can be distributed digitally. Stealing digitial goods is awesome so long as there is a huge library of good content to steal from, but if the monetary incentive dries up, nobody will be producing those goods anymore for everyone to steal. Rampant, casual piracy has just been a normal part of daily life in East Asia, Russia, and eastern Eurpoe for the last 30 years or so, but they couldn't have had access to that catalog of free content were it not for all the people supporting its production by paying for it in the USA, UK, France, etc. It's kind of like socialism/communism. It works great until your stockpile of rich people on which you have been feeding is dried up. The scary/sad part is, in the first world, especially among the youth, the attitude that digital content has no intrinsic value is only getting more prevalant year after year.
RE: DRM should be illegal
8/1/2012 7:37:14 AM
In general, I think the upcoming generation doesn't really have a firm grasp on nor do they seem to place or assess any real value in much of anything.
I agree with all of what you've said though.
"If they're going to pirate somebody, we want it to be us rather than somebody else." -- Microsoft Business Group President Jeff Raikes
"Call of Juarez: The Cartel" Angers Critics, May be Banned in Mexico
February 22, 2011, 10:01 AM
Assassin's Creed II Stabs Its Way to Success With 1.6 Million Units Sold
November 26, 2009, 9:00 AM
The EFF Wants You to Know About Sony BMG Settlement
March 13, 2006, 2:17 AM
Apple Releases iOS 7.1, The First Major Update to Its "Rethought" Mobile OS
March 10, 2014, 1:52 PM
Windows 8.1 Update 1 Leaked Early
March 7, 2014, 9:30 AM
Xbox One Gets Beta Version of "Project Spark" Starting Today
March 4, 2014, 2:33 PM
Cortana Voice Assistant Coming to Windows Phone in New 8.1 Update
March 3, 2014, 1:09 PM
Microsoft Launches Site to Tell Clueless Customers if They're Running XP
March 3, 2014, 12:34 PM
With Windows XP Support Ending Soon, Microsoft Uses Pop-ups to Encourage Upgrades
March 3, 2014, 9:43 AM
Most Popular Articles
Bitcoin King Pt. II: Mt. Gox's Dictator Karpelès Proves Tragically Flawed
March 7, 2014, 1:12 PM
Hack Reveals Fallen Bitcoin CEO's Posh Tokyo Penthouse
March 10, 2014, 4:28 PM
Tesla Motors Calls New Jersey Out on New Rule Against Its Direct Sales Model
March 11, 2014, 12:01 PM
NASA Considering SpaceX "Red Dragon" for Returning Mars Samples to Earth
March 10, 2014, 2:43 PM
India Could Rock Google With Its Biggest Antitrust Fine Yet -- $5B USD
March 10, 2014, 8:12 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Tesla vs. BMW: Who Has the Safer EV?
Feb 1, 2014, 2:56 PM
Justice Leaks Details of Next HTC One Two Flagship Phone
Dec 5, 2013, 4:04 PM
Global Cyber Espionage Concerns Reveal Growing Cyber Armies
Nov 29, 2013, 11:04 AM
Is The Period Becoming an Expression of Anger?
Nov 26, 2013, 2:02 PM
NSA and Congress -- You Will Never Kill the Constitution, It's an Idea
Nov 10, 2013, 2:00 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information