President Obama Scolds Businesses, Urges Passage of Cybersecurity Act
July 20, 2012 5:16 PM
comment(s) - last by
Republicans, Democrats both support measure to expand federal power, but Ron Paul leads minority opposition
The Wall Street Journal
, a newspaper published by conservative media mogul Rupert Murdoch's News Corp. (NWS), President Obama laid out his opinion of why
is such a dire threat to the nation and his opinion on what should be done about it.
I. President Obama Calls Out Businesses for Poor Security
In the piece he describes the results of a recent wargames simulation by nation defense and intelligence agencies, recalling, "Across the country trains had derailed, including one carrying industrial chemicals that exploded into a toxic cloud. Water treatment plants in several states had shut down, contaminating drinking water and causing Americans to fall ill."
The scenario was fictional, but President Obama warns it could happen, if safeguards are not put in place.
President Obama claims terrorists could use cyber-attacks to derail trains.
[Image Source: Zimbio]
He blames poor security partially on the corporate sector, calling out the glaring incompetence security-wise of decision makers at some utilities and other vital infrastructure firms. He
Yet simply sharing more information is not enough. Ultimately, this is about security gaps that have to be filled. To their credit, many of these companies have boosted their cyber defenses. But many others have not, with some lacking even the most basic protection: a good password. That puts public safety and our national security at risk.
The American people deserve to know that companies running our critical infrastructure meet basic, commonsense cybersecurity standards, just as they already meet other security requirements.
President Obama wants to expand the federal gov't to "solve" the cybersecurity "crisis".
[Image Source: U.S. Aid]
President Obama is proposing an amendment
National Security Act of 1947
[PDF], which is ostensibly targeted at promoting information and expertise sharing between U.S. government agencies and key civilian-sector contractors/infrastructure providers.
II. Bill to Expand DHS is Backed by Both Parties, But Has a Few Vocal Critics
[PDF], is a redraft of earlier House bill
The new bill is dubbed the "Cybersecurity Act of 2012". The key change from the earlier house measure is that the Senate bill funnels the information shared by private sector firms through the
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(DHS). President Obama vocally
opposed the earlier House bill
, which put the DHS in more of a backseat role.
The bill would expand the scope of the DHS. [Image Source: CyTalk]
The new bill enjoys a fair measure of bipartisan support in the Senate. It is sponsored by Senators
J. D. "Jay" Rockefeller IV
(D- West Virginia).
However, the bill has a couple of vocal opponents among the more liberal and more conservative members of the House. Among those opposed to expanding the DHS's role is
Rep. Ron Paul
(R-TX). Rep. Paul
the bill "Big Brother writ large."
Rep. Ron Paul is one of the few opponents of the measure to expand federal government.
[Image Source: AP]
Rep. Paul has suggested that the Department of Homeland Security is poor in talent, offensive to civil liberties, and redundant, commenting [
Before 9/11, we were spending $40 billion a year, and the FBI was producing numerous information about people being trained on airplanes, to fly them but not land them. And they totally ignored them. So it’s the inefficiency of the bureaucracy that is the problem. So, increasing this with the Department of Homeland Security and spending more money doesn’t absolve us of the problem. Yes, we have every right in the world to know something about intelligence gathering. But we have to have intelligent people interpreting this information.
President Obama is urging Democrats and Republicans to come together, as they oft do, to overlook civil liberties and debt concerns and pass a bill to expand the federal government. As with many such expansions of federal government pushed by America's two ruling parties in recent years, there will likely be large price tag to this measure. And as usual the justification is "national security".
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Oh, so he wants to nationalize everything now?
7/24/2012 1:13:21 PM
I often enjoy your rational comments and have never posted on DT till now. But I just couldn't let your disinformation slide.
Disagreeing is fine. Outright lying is not.
RP has *NEVER*, not even once, supported the idea that 9/11 was an inside job. He has said that it was in response to our foreign policy, which it was.
Regarding the Civil Rights act, most of it was about prohibiting the government from discriminating on race, which he completely supported. The only provision he had a problem with is prohibiting private business from discrimination. It's not that he supports racism at all. Rather, he sees the larger picture of things. He knew that once you get the camel's nose in the tent, eventually the whole thing is inside. Once you start telling a private business who they can serve, then bit by bit, the government will end up running the entire business. See today for proof.
Regarding the gold standard, let me just say that fractional reserved, debt based fiat currency isn't working out so well. The gold standard failed in the past during certain times not because people were adhering to it, but rather because they were disobeying it. Meaning, they issued more paper receipts than gold on deposit existed. Which is basically fractional reserve banking, which will always fail as it is based on fraud (lying).
He's not perfect, but he's been mostly right on just about every other issue as well: war on drugs, war on poverty, war on terror, civil liberties, economic interventionism (specifically housing). The list goes on and on and with every passing day he is proved more and more right than anyone else. Give credit where it's due.
Like I said above, I generally enjoy your logical comments, but that one was way out of line. I even had to make a DT account to respond =)
"Nowadays, security guys break the Mac every single day. Every single day, they come out with a total exploit, your machine can be taken over totally. I dare anybody to do that once a month on the Windows machine." -- Bill Gates
Ron Paul, President Obama in Opposition of Cybersecurity Bill
April 26, 2012, 2:44 PM
NSA: China is Destroying U.S. Economy Via Security Hacks
March 28, 2012, 7:06 PM
Creationists are Mad About Google Doodle Depicting Evolution
November 24, 2015, 8:48 PM
DHS and TSA: Whoops, We Missed That 73 Airport Employees May be Terrorists
November 19, 2015, 2:16 PM
Star Wars Spinoff Film "Rogue One", Theme Park Attractions Announced
August 17, 2015, 12:20 PM
SpaceX Falcon 9's Seventh Supply Mission to ISS Ends w/ Fiery Stage 1 Explosion
June 28, 2015, 1:10 PM
Cool Science Video: Glowing Millipede Prowls the Nevada Desert
May 18, 2015, 12:00 PM
Newly Discovered Costa Rican Glass Frog is Kermit's Doppelgänger
April 22, 2015, 11:26 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information