Apple Patents Mobile Lists, Method to Make a Graphic Disappear; Plans More Suits
July 18, 2012 2:40 PM
comment(s) - last by
Pictures of the 2004 iPad prototype also surface is court filings
Apple, Inc. (
) is at the center of nearly
two-thirds of patent suits
in the mobile industry. The company has been
targeted by trolls
due to its profitability, but it has also used its large portfolio of questionable software patents to try to preserve that profitability, playing aggressor and
stifling would be competitors
I. USPTO: Feeding the Trolls
This week inspectors at the
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
(USPTO) granted Apple two new patents that push the bounds of reason and represent, once again, the vast disconnect between the nation's intellectual property office and any sort of technical competence.
The first patent covers making an on-screen graphical element, disappear, more or less. Brand new
U.S. Patent No. 8,223,134
claims invention of using "a predetermined condition" to determine when "display of a vertical bar is ceased".
Apple has patented making a scrolling icon disappear. [Image Source: The Verge]
Even in a narrow context, it is somewhat baffling how making a graphic disappear when some program conditions are met is patentable.
Apple had already patented making a scrolling list accelerate or slow down. That technology is described by
U.S. Patent No. 7,479,949
, which was filed in April 2008 and granted in Jan. 2009.
It has been
[PDF] by intellectual property expert
Judge Richard A. Posner
that the claim construction in Apple's past scrolling patents is quite broad. Some have misinterpreted this as an assertion that the patent was valid. In fact, Judge Posner feels that
most software patents are invalid
-- he was simply noting that Apple lawyers are right -- the patents being granted by the USPTO are purposefully worded to be alarmingly broad.
Yet another example of Apple's bizarrely broad patents and the USPTO's baffling insistence on approving them comes from
U.S. Patent No. 8,223,134
-- also granted this week.
Patent '134 describes the invention of "displaying electronic lists and documents". Granted, Apple presents this "invention" in a mobile context, and throws in multi-touch. But essentially it has patented in rather broad and ambiguous language displaying a list on a smartphone.
Not only is this "invention" not an invention at all due to obviousness, it's more than likely invalid due to prior art.
II. Lax Reviews Waste Taxpayer Money and Hurt Competition
The USPTO's willingness to embrace Apple's legal trolling creates two crucial problems for the U.S.
First, taxpayers must see their money wasted on paying Judges and juries to deal with Apple's slew of lawsuits and subsequent appeals against its competitors. Second, if Apple can find just one sympathetic court, it can use its patent horde to ban its competitors from the market, in an attempt to grant itself a government-enforced monopoly.
Apple successfully banned the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 using similar patents.
[Images Source: 9to5Google]
This was showcased in Apple's case against Samsung Electronics Comp., Ltd. (
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
(San Jose/San Francisco). In one of its court motions Apple sought to ban the Galaxy Tab 10.1 on the grounds that it infringed on its patented design.
Judge Lucy Koh
rejected this notion
, saying Apple's design patent --
U.S. Design Patent D504,889
-- was likely invalid due to prior art (and the fact that it looked neither like an iPad nor a Galaxy Tab 10.1). But the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
heard Apple's appeal of that ruling and decided the design patent
valid. The end result was a
ban on the competitor's tablet
Likewise, in another case Judge Koh agreed to
tentatively ban the smartphone
on the grounds of several software patents similar to be above-granted ones.
While those patents may eventually be invalidated, it cannot be denied that Apple has gained a key anti-competitive advantage by gaming the system.
III. iPad Prototype Images Surface
Speaking of the Galaxy Tab case, remember these images, appearing in the design patent:
Apple's D'889 patent [Image Source: Google Patents]
Well the photographic model of those sketches has
, courtesy of documents found in Apple's legal filings. The documents offer the world's first glimpse at the 2004-era iPad.
[Image Source: Network World]
The prototype looks just like the design patent's drawings -- and not much like the iPad. The bezel size is different, the case is bulky, and there are no buttons.
Again, here we see how Apple has managed to get a single court to buy into its theory that it should be granted a broad monopoly by a single highly questionable, and, at the very least, very narrow patent.
Sources: USPTO ,
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Couldn't have said it better
7/19/2012 8:10:49 AM
This is why complete legal novices shouldn't think their suggestions of prior art constitute anything legally relevant.
Look at your own example. It's the same as every web browser - it adds a scroll bar when the content exceeds the size of the container.
what was patented. So why on earth did you reference it thinking it was?
Did you simply not understand what either a) Your link or b) The patent was about?
RE: Couldn't have said it better
7/19/2012 1:38:58 PM
And I guess if you patent a doorknob that turns left to open a door instead of one that turns right that is a valid patent also.
"What would I do? I'd shut it down and give the money back to the shareholders." -- Michael Dell, after being asked what to do with Apple Computer in 1997
Analyst: Apple is Involved in 60 Percent of Mobile Patent Lawsuits
July 11, 2012, 2:04 PM
U.S. Patent System is Broken, Declares Judge in Android v. Apple Cases
July 6, 2012, 1:12 PM
Apple Granted Preliminary Injunction Against Samsung’s Galaxy Nexus
June 30, 2012, 3:10 AM
Apple Wins Galaxy Tab 10.1 Ban in U.S.
June 27, 2012, 11:28 AM
Game Over? Apple's Bid to Kill HTC Nears Fruition as ITC Blocks Imports
May 16, 2012, 11:35 AM
Quick Note: Google Chromebooks Now Coming with 1TB of Google Drive Space
November 21, 2014, 1:20 PM
Xiaomi Aims to be #1 Smartphone OEM Within 10 Years, Apple Urges Caution
November 21, 2014, 9:33 AM
Quick Note: Samsung's Request to Dismiss Microsoft Lawsuit is Rejected
November 20, 2014, 12:53 PM
Amazon Offers "The Washington Post" Free for Six Months to Kindle Fire Owners
November 20, 2014, 7:41 AM
Apple Watch Screen Resolution, App Limitations are Laid Bare by Developer Kit
November 19, 2014, 11:31 PM
Apple Replaces “FREE” Label with “GET” on App Downloads in iTunes App Store
November 19, 2014, 5:38 PM
Most Popular Articles
Wal-Mart: Miss Thanksgiving, Get Xbox One + Master Chief Collection for $299
November 17, 2014, 9:40 PM
Nokia Lumia 635 LTE Windows Phone is Only $40 at Best Buy on Black Friday
November 18, 2014, 11:59 AM
Sweden Mulls Labelling "Sexist" Video Games in the Wake of Gamergate
November 17, 2014, 2:00 PM
It's Official: Twitter is Profitable "Junk"
November 16, 2014, 10:45 PM
Austrian Pilots Call Surface 3 Pro Flight Bag a "Dream Come True"
November 14, 2014, 2:00 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
Space Terrorism is a Looming Threat For the United States
Apr 23, 2014, 7:47 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information