Apple Patents Mobile Lists, Method to Make a Graphic Disappear; Plans More Suits
July 18, 2012 2:40 PM
comment(s) - last by
Pictures of the 2004 iPad prototype also surface is court filings
Apple, Inc. (
) is at the center of nearly
two-thirds of patent suits
in the mobile industry. The company has been
targeted by trolls
due to its profitability, but it has also used its large portfolio of questionable software patents to try to preserve that profitability, playing aggressor and
stifling would be competitors
I. USPTO: Feeding the Trolls
This week inspectors at the
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
(USPTO) granted Apple two new patents that push the bounds of reason and represent, once again, the vast disconnect between the nation's intellectual property office and any sort of technical competence.
The first patent covers making an on-screen graphical element, disappear, more or less. Brand new
U.S. Patent No. 8,223,134
claims invention of using "a predetermined condition" to determine when "display of a vertical bar is ceased".
Apple has patented making a scrolling icon disappear. [Image Source: The Verge]
Even in a narrow context, it is somewhat baffling how making a graphic disappear when some program conditions are met is patentable.
Apple had already patented making a scrolling list accelerate or slow down. That technology is described by
U.S. Patent No. 7,479,949
, which was filed in April 2008 and granted in Jan. 2009.
It has been
[PDF] by intellectual property expert
Judge Richard A. Posner
that the claim construction in Apple's past scrolling patents is quite broad. Some have misinterpreted this as an assertion that the patent was valid. In fact, Judge Posner feels that
most software patents are invalid
-- he was simply noting that Apple lawyers are right -- the patents being granted by the USPTO are purposefully worded to be alarmingly broad.
Yet another example of Apple's bizarrely broad patents and the USPTO's baffling insistence on approving them comes from
U.S. Patent No. 8,223,134
-- also granted this week.
Patent '134 describes the invention of "displaying electronic lists and documents". Granted, Apple presents this "invention" in a mobile context, and throws in multi-touch. But essentially it has patented in rather broad and ambiguous language displaying a list on a smartphone.
Not only is this "invention" not an invention at all due to obviousness, it's more than likely invalid due to prior art.
II. Lax Reviews Waste Taxpayer Money and Hurt Competition
The USPTO's willingness to embrace Apple's legal trolling creates two crucial problems for the U.S.
First, taxpayers must see their money wasted on paying Judges and juries to deal with Apple's slew of lawsuits and subsequent appeals against its competitors. Second, if Apple can find just one sympathetic court, it can use its patent horde to ban its competitors from the market, in an attempt to grant itself a government-enforced monopoly.
Apple successfully banned the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 using similar patents.
[Images Source: 9to5Google]
This was showcased in Apple's case against Samsung Electronics Comp., Ltd. (
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
(San Jose/San Francisco). In one of its court motions Apple sought to ban the Galaxy Tab 10.1 on the grounds that it infringed on its patented design.
Judge Lucy Koh
rejected this notion
, saying Apple's design patent --
U.S. Design Patent D504,889
-- was likely invalid due to prior art (and the fact that it looked neither like an iPad nor a Galaxy Tab 10.1). But the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
heard Apple's appeal of that ruling and decided the design patent
valid. The end result was a
ban on the competitor's tablet
Likewise, in another case Judge Koh agreed to
tentatively ban the smartphone
on the grounds of several software patents similar to be above-granted ones.
While those patents may eventually be invalidated, it cannot be denied that Apple has gained a key anti-competitive advantage by gaming the system.
III. iPad Prototype Images Surface
Speaking of the Galaxy Tab case, remember these images, appearing in the design patent:
Apple's D'889 patent [Image Source: Google Patents]
Well the photographic model of those sketches has
, courtesy of documents found in Apple's legal filings. The documents offer the world's first glimpse at the 2004-era iPad.
[Image Source: Network World]
The prototype looks just like the design patent's drawings -- and not much like the iPad. The bezel size is different, the case is bulky, and there are no buttons.
Again, here we see how Apple has managed to get a single court to buy into its theory that it should be granted a broad monopoly by a single highly questionable, and, at the very least, very narrow patent.
Sources: USPTO ,
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
This is ridiculous!
7/18/2012 4:08:23 PM
This is absolutely ridiculous! Apple with their ridiculous patent trolling killed off the EXTREMELY successful tablet market when they introduced the iPad. I mean every manufacture couldn't wait to release a new version of their tablet because they were making money hand over fist. There were some AMAZING products being introduced before Apple just barged in with their tactics and killed a once flourishing and innovative market. There was just some much competition going on then.
Oh wait, I think I have that wrong. No manufacture wanted to touch the tablet market with a 10 foot pole after a looooong string of failed products. And now when Apple made the impossible possible (brought the tablet market back to life), everyone is screaming, Apple is killing COMPETITION. Give me a break. Apple MADE this market segment successful, and to the victor go the spoils. If other companies wanted a piece of the tablet market, they had PLENTY of time to make it work. The fact is, they couldn't. Now after Apple single-handedly brought a market back to life (tablet market), everyone else now wants to join in and use Apple's product as a template for their own and scream "NOT FAIR" when Apple sues them. Give me a break. I hope Apple sues every other iPad knock-off tablet maker into the ground.
RE: This is ridiculous!
7/18/2012 5:02:36 PM
^^^ Listen to this guys, he's awesome!
"Folks that want porn can buy an Android phone." -- Steve Jobs
Analyst: Apple is Involved in 60 Percent of Mobile Patent Lawsuits
July 11, 2012, 2:04 PM
U.S. Patent System is Broken, Declares Judge in Android v. Apple Cases
July 6, 2012, 1:12 PM
Apple Granted Preliminary Injunction Against Samsung’s Galaxy Nexus
June 30, 2012, 3:10 AM
Apple Wins Galaxy Tab 10.1 Ban in U.S.
June 27, 2012, 11:28 AM
Game Over? Apple's Bid to Kill HTC Nears Fruition as ITC Blocks Imports
May 16, 2012, 11:35 AM
Retiree Sues Apple For $7,500 for Wiping Honeymoon Photos From His iPhone
November 30, 2015, 10:23 AM
iPhone 7 May Pack 3-4 GB Memory, More Storage; 4-Inch Comeback is Rumored
November 20, 2015, 10:12 PM
OnePlus One, OnePlus 2 Will Receive Android Marshmallow in Q1 2016
November 16, 2015, 9:58 AM
Lenovo Whoa: Motorola Droid MAXX 2 and Turbo 2 Break Cover in Leaks
October 26, 2015, 3:12 PM
Leak: Apple Preps for First Real Android App Foray With New Apple Music App
October 24, 2015, 1:59 PM
Pepsi Smartphone? Empty Calories Coming Soon to the Midrange
October 12, 2015, 11:41 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information