backtop


Print 63 comment(s) - last by Visual.. on Jul 23 at 6:29 AM


  (Source: imgur.com)
It has been challenging for the engineers to find jobs that pay as well as NASA

Engineers that once earned six-figure incomes with NASA's space shuttle program are now looking for work or taking jobs that are far below their skill level due to the retirement of the Discovery, Endeavor, and Atlantis shuttles. 

Last year, NASA retired each of the three remaining spacecraft in the U.S. space shuttle program, which lasted nearly 30 years. In February 2011, Space Shuttle Discovery was the first of the three to launch on its final mission with Space Shuttle Endeavour following in May 2011. Space Shuttle Atlantis was the last to go in July 2011.

Since the space shuttle fleet's retirement, about 7,400 engineers from the Kennedy Space Center in Brevard County, Florida (also known as the Space Coast) were laid off. Today, there are only 8,500 workers at the Kennedy Space Center total when there used to be around 15,000.

A majority of those laid off were individuals in their 50s and 60s who made in the realm of $80,000 to over $100,000 annually. But now, these engineers are finding it difficult to locate jobs at their skill level that pay as well as NASA did. In fact, local Brevard County employers have asked that the Brevard Workforce, which is an unemployment agency, stop sending ex-space employees to them because they want salaries that are comparable to what they made at the Kennedy Space Center.

"STOP sending former Space Center employees," wrote one local employer. "They have an unrealistic salary expectation."

Aside from money issues, another problem the former engineers are facing is age. Many have been working for the Kennedy Space Center for decades. Other engineering options mainly take in the younger generations.

"Nobody wants to hire the old guy," said Terry White, a 62-year-old ex-project manager for the space shuttle program who was laid off last summer. "There just isn't a lot of work around here. Or if so, the wages are really small."

NASA's space shuttle fleet is gone for good, but some saw hope in the private sector, such as SpaceX. SpaceX is a California-based space technology company that recently stepped in when NASA retired the space shuttle program. Its Dragon spacecraft made history recently when it made the first private spaceflight to the International Space Station (ISS).

However, SpaceX didn't require nearly as many employees as NASA did for its space shuttle fleet.

To make up for the loss, many former engineers are stuck having to either retire early, take lower-paying jobs, or collect unemployment.

Source: MSNBC



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: o rly
By WalksTheWalk on 7/18/2012 9:23:31 AM , Rating: 2
In your argument you mention that the government is in the best position to provide internet access. Internet access is composed of the physical lines and the service that connects and routes your requests. Using your model, the government is in the best position to not only provide roads but also provide all shipping across those roads making it somehow cheaper.

What I'm saying is that in a modern society, the government should provide certain shared infrastructure which is required to advance society where the government is in the best position to do it due to certain logistical and legal problems. The infrastructure that makes sense to do this with (roads, power and telecommunications lines) crosses many legal boundaries such as various public and private properties. The Government entity (or government-sponsored entity) is the only entity that has the right of way and legal force to provide and maintain the infrastructure, so it makes sense for them to contract for its construction and maintenance. Government also has the ability to limit their liability so they cannot (typically) be liable if some hits a pothole then crashes, or a power line falls in a storm and injures someone. Private companies should then be able to use the infrastructure to provide services to the population such as telecommunications, leasing the lines from the government.

If the voters want to grant a local municipality a monopoly on certain services that's their business, but they do so at the mercy of their local government and the ultimate detriment of their municipality. All I'm saying is that it's typically a recipe for inefficiency, abuse and waste over time.

To your point about private water, police and roads, again the government is the only entity that can provide these since they need to cross many legal boundaries. If you think these items are provided and managed efficiently then I just can't help you.


"If you mod me down, I will become more insightful than you can possibly imagine." -- Slashdot














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki