Print 63 comment(s) - last by Visual.. on Jul 23 at 6:29 AM

It has been challenging for the engineers to find jobs that pay as well as NASA

Engineers that once earned six-figure incomes with NASA's space shuttle program are now looking for work or taking jobs that are far below their skill level due to the retirement of the Discovery, Endeavor, and Atlantis shuttles. 

Last year, NASA retired each of the three remaining spacecraft in the U.S. space shuttle program, which lasted nearly 30 years. In February 2011, Space Shuttle Discovery was the first of the three to launch on its final mission with Space Shuttle Endeavour following in May 2011. Space Shuttle Atlantis was the last to go in July 2011.

Since the space shuttle fleet's retirement, about 7,400 engineers from the Kennedy Space Center in Brevard County, Florida (also known as the Space Coast) were laid off. Today, there are only 8,500 workers at the Kennedy Space Center total when there used to be around 15,000.

A majority of those laid off were individuals in their 50s and 60s who made in the realm of $80,000 to over $100,000 annually. But now, these engineers are finding it difficult to locate jobs at their skill level that pay as well as NASA did. In fact, local Brevard County employers have asked that the Brevard Workforce, which is an unemployment agency, stop sending ex-space employees to them because they want salaries that are comparable to what they made at the Kennedy Space Center.

"STOP sending former Space Center employees," wrote one local employer. "They have an unrealistic salary expectation."

Aside from money issues, another problem the former engineers are facing is age. Many have been working for the Kennedy Space Center for decades. Other engineering options mainly take in the younger generations.

"Nobody wants to hire the old guy," said Terry White, a 62-year-old ex-project manager for the space shuttle program who was laid off last summer. "There just isn't a lot of work around here. Or if so, the wages are really small."

NASA's space shuttle fleet is gone for good, but some saw hope in the private sector, such as SpaceX. SpaceX is a California-based space technology company that recently stepped in when NASA retired the space shuttle program. Its Dragon spacecraft made history recently when it made the first private spaceflight to the International Space Station (ISS).

However, SpaceX didn't require nearly as many employees as NASA did for its space shuttle fleet.

To make up for the loss, many former engineers are stuck having to either retire early, take lower-paying jobs, or collect unemployment.

Source: MSNBC

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: o rly
By StevoLincolnite on 7/17/2012 10:21:38 AM , Rating: 2
I'm not fully aware of the broadband situation in the U.S.

However as I understand it... (Correct me if I'm wrong)
The American government had a large hand in building your current broadband infrastructure, the whole problem of cost comes down to competition where allot of your providers pretty much monopolized entire areas.

Most other countries Broadband can be served by multiple providers to each home, each with competing infrastructure making Broadband cheap and fast.

RE: o rly
By Solandri on 7/18/2012 1:48:38 PM , Rating: 2
In the U.S. there are strict limits (though not as strict before) on the government's power to nationalize private land for public use. Consequently, the easements needed to run power and utility lines aren't always the easiest thing for the government to get, and they're required by law to compensate the landowner. So the government tries to recoup some of that cost when private companies wish to use those easements.

For broadband in particular, most municipal governments had a long list of demands regarding coverage, availability, pricing, etc. if a company wanted the rights to lay down their lines in easements to provide cable/phone service. The cable/phone companies would only agree to these demands if they were guaranteed a monopoly in service. Consequently most locations only have a single cable company and a single phone company providing service.

So the government didn't have a large hand in building the current infrastructure - it was all privately built (sometimes with some public funding). But the government did have a hand in creating local utility monopolies. Basically, the government made it illegal for a second cable company or a second phone company to provide service in most areas.

"Paying an extra $500 for a computer in this environment -- same piece of hardware -- paying $500 more to get a logo on it? I think that's a more challenging proposition for the average person than it used to be." -- Steve Ballmer

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki