Print 109 comment(s) - last by NellyFromMA.. on Jul 31 at 4:37 PM

  (Source: Sodahead)
Tax and expand the federal gov't says Texas Rep. Lamar Smith (R)

"When there's copyright infringement / In your neighborhood / Who you gonna call? / The U.S. federal taxpayer funded IP task-force!"

I. SOPA Returns, Renamed and Pared Down

It sounds like a joke, but that's precisely what the The Intellectual Property Attaché Act [PDF], hopes to implement.  The goal is to fight "global" piracy, but the proposal admittedly acknowledges that the taskforce -- a sub-agency of the U.S. Department of Commerce -- could be used in the homeland, as well.

In fact, it seems more than likely that the task-force created by the IP Attaché Act, would operate mostly in the U.S., given difficulties in sending IP "cops" overseas to quasi-hostile infringement-prone regions like China. (What would they do in China, "arrest" street merchants selling knockoff DVDs?)

Overseas complaints are already well-policed -- or about as well policed as is possible -- by the World Trade Organization (WTO).

So the new Commerce Department copyrights cops are essentially redundant, unless their policing happens to primarily focus on the U.S.  And you can bet it does.

The bill is essentially a repackaging of the heart and soul of the fortunately deceased "Stop Online Piracy Act" (SOPA) (H.R. 3261) and the U.S. Senate's Protect Intellectual Property Act (PIPA) (S.968).  In fact, it's authored by the same fellow -- Rep. Lamar Smith (R- Tex.) -- who wrote SOPA.

Rep. Smith surely was sweating a bit under the collar when SOPA went down in flames. After all, big media wrote him a check for $85,000 USD during the last campaign cycle [source] and lawyers, many of whom represent big media clients, chipped in another $58,000 USD. [source

Lamar Smith
Rep. Lamar Smith feels he's above the laws he's looking to subject his lowly proles to.
[Image Source: Lamar Smith]

Together these contributions gave him about 10 percent of the money he needed to crush Lainey Melnick 69-to-28 percent voting margin (Mr. Melnick only raised $34,000 USD lacking sufficient big media sponsors).  To be fair, many of Rep. Smith's colleagues received similar payouts from big media.

That kind of money doesn't come for free or cheap.  It comes with big favors.  In this case the cost of the donations was likely a commitment to tirelessly push "anti-piracy" legislation even if it ignores big media corporations' own flagrant copyright theft, wastes taxpayer money, and likely tramples on civil liberties.

Clearly Rep. Smith doesn't truly take his rhetoric to heart, given the fact that he ripped off an independent artist's work for his homepage art, and reportedly initially refused requests from the artist for acknowledgement.

II. Will it Pass?

So does the IP Attaché Act stand any more of a chance of surviving than Rep. Smith's last monstrosity, SOPA?


The largely politically apathetic public burned through a great deal of energy killing the last bill.  And this revised version will likely draw less corporate opposition in that it appears to remove its provisions for sweeping website takedowns in its draft.

Further, the SOPA v. 2.0 (of sorts) has the support of House Oversight Chairman, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) -- who initially supported SOPA as well, but later became a critic who helped sink the measure.  

TechCrunch has obtained a statement from Rep. Issa's office, commenting:

Rep. Issa is set to support the legislation, with small modifications. The Intellectual Property Attaché Act is written to help American individuals and companies that are experiencing intellectual property infringement in certain foreign countries. The legislation will place USPTO trained IP attaches in countries around the world, focusing on areas where American job creators and innovators are experiencing especially high levels of IP-theft. These attaches will work with the foreign governments to help eliminate in-country IP theft that is occurring. This is a net benefit to all Americans both IP holders and consumers. Also, the training and other programs that the attaches may provide can also help local law enforcement to deal with IP-infringement that is occurring. The cost for these attaches will come from collected PTO fees, meaning that the bill is revenue neutral. Additionally, we expect that an amendment will be made to the legislation before it is marked up that will instruct the attaches to promote clear IP exceptions ­ like fair use – already codified in U.S. Law.

The biggest hope for killing the measure perhaps lies in its likely substantial costs and sweeping expansion of the federal government.  Ballooning federal government and burdening taxpayers with the expense of large new federal programs certainly sounds outside the line of traditional fiscal conservative rhetoric that's in vogue these days.

zombie crawling
SOPA v. 2.0 has crawled back onto the scene, but might be killed yet.
[Image Source: DeviantArt;~k1ow3]

Some Republicans may balk at essentially voting for "a tax" in order to scratch the back of big media.  Although, the fact that big media donated generously to a great many members of Congress may allow them to look past their own political beasts and shove this copyright debt on the shoulders of the masses.

At least overseas there are signs of a break in the storm of big media trolling.  Denmark has turned off its warning letters program.  And Canada has implemented strong protections/permissions for user-generated content (e.g. montages) and capped non-commercial infringement at $5,000 USD.

In other words, the U.S. is one of the last places where big media can hope to sue individual citizens for millions of dollars for pirating a few songs.  It also looks to become one of the few nations to install a special redundant "copyright police" agency at the federal level, financed by its citizens' tax burden.

Sources: House of Representatives [PDF], TechCrunch

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Oookay
By EnzoFX on 7/12/2012 6:10:38 PM , Rating: 2
Just like a Republican. Dismiss whatever doesn't expand your nonsense. He has it more right than a lot of comments on here. To say that there is symmetry right now between parties is retarded. The GOP-Hijacked Right wing is led by more extremists. But keep putting your head up your ass. Calling the moderate left fascists is infantile. The problem right wing nuts fail to see is that we've tried it their way for most of the last decade, and every-single-part of it has failed. Taxes couldn't be lower for the rich, government jobs are at an all time low, yet they scream at every instance of expanding either, because chanting that government is too big will eventually make it true. It defies reasoning to me how someone who can be a tech enthusiast and not see simple logic in the current fail system that is the Republican party.

RE: Oookay
By KCjoker on 7/12/2012 6:50:27 PM , Rating: 2
What you fail to acknowlege is that for a good part of Bush jr term the congress was controlled by the Dems so don't put our fiscal problems only on the R's. It's both sides...problem is the R's want to spend like crazy and the D's want to doubel that. Back when the economy was great was when Clinton was in office and the congress was controlled by the Repubs. Remember the famous phrase by Clinton "The era of big government is OVER".

RE: Oookay
By retrospooty on 7/12/2012 11:05:25 PM , Rating: 2
the democrats in congress for 2 of bush JR's 8 years... but I totally agree its all of them. that is exactly the point I was trying to make. you cant sit there and blame democrats or republicans because it's both of them

RE: Oookay
By Ringold on 7/13/2012 2:26:51 AM , Rating: 2
So you can call the far-right extremists, but calling the far-left fascists, that's infantile. So by extension, you're calling yourself infantile too. Got it. Thanks.

You know, at least in Europe, some countries have leftist parties that are honest. They'll outright admit what they are. Socialist Party of <Insert country here>. Communist Party. Green Party. Or, in Denmark I think it is, the latest honesty in terms of global political trends: The Red-Green Alliance, which is what Republican's have known all along; communism, environmentalism, same thing different decade.

government jobs are at an all time low, yet they scream at every instance of expanding either, because chanting that government is too big will eventually make it true.

It defies reasoning to me how someone who can be a tech enthusiast and not see simple logic

Got your data wrong. Tell you what, lefty. I'll take a return to Clinton-era tax rates if we return to Clinton-era levels of government spending as a percentage of GDP, how about that? Clinton left us at around 18%, Obama's got us around 25%. Sound fair to you? Tax the rich (and middle class) a little bit more, and in return, take a shotgun to 1/4 of the government which, in your strange mind, hasn't grown?

RE: Oookay
By nick2000 on 7/13/2012 2:08:35 PM , Rating: 2
You keep mixing them up. Communist=left and fascism=right
You could go talk to actual fascists and suggest that they have common cause with communists and that would be entertaining. (fascists are anti-unions...)

RE: Oookay
By Ringold on 7/13/2012 5:11:34 PM , Rating: 2
I was just referencing the OP

“And I don't know why [Apple is] acting like it’s superior. I don't even get it. What are they trying to say?” -- Bill Gates on the Mac ads

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
Snapchat’s New Sunglasses are a Spectacle – No Pun Intended
September 24, 2016, 9:02 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki