Print 29 comment(s) - last by freedom4556.. on Jul 17 at 5:26 AM

CNN/Fortune bestows this unwanted title on GM's mainstream, midsize "mild" hybrid

When it comes to all-new vehicles introduced in the past year, one model in particular has left many reviewers and industry analysts scratching their heads. The vehicle in question is the 2013 Chevrolet Malibu Eco, which was the first trim level introduced for the redesigned midsize sedan (it will soon be followed by a 2.5-liter naturally aspirated four-cylinder engine and 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine options).
What makes the Malibu Eco so perplexing, however, is that despite its mild hybrid powertrain, it doesn't appear to do anything better than its more conventional rivals and falls well short of "true" hybrids competitors. Fortune deems the Malibu Eco "The most disliked car of the year (so far)" based on reviews from auto outlets like Autoblog, Car and Driver, The Truth About Cars, and New York Times.
There are plenty of criticisms about the poor backseat room (due to a 4" cut in the wheelbase to make room for the redesigned 2014 Impala in the Chevrolet lineup), reduced trunk space relative to its predecessor (and even its cheaper Cruze Eco sibling), and poor handling. But the harshest comments are leveled at the Malibu Eco's powertrain. The vehicle uses an electric motor generator and a 65-pound battery that robs trunk space to boost its fuel economy numbers; however, it's simply not enough against the competition.

For example, the Malibu Eco starts at $25,995 and is rated at 25/37 (city/highway). For comparison, here's how the vehicle stacks up to its more conventional competitors which have base prices that starts at least $2,000 lower:
  • Nissan Altima: 27/38
  • Toyota Camry: 25/35
  • Hyundai Sonata: 24/35 
The $21,500 Nissan Altima manages to undercut the Malibu Eco by over $4,000, yet delivers better fuel economy (city and highway), has a larger interior/trunk, and is nearly 500 lbs lighter. The Malibu Eco fares better against the Camry and Sonata, but both vehicles put up competitive numbers without the added weight, cost, and complexity of GM's mild hybrid powertrain.
The Malibu takes an even heavier beating from full-hybrid and diesel midsize sedans that cost roughly the same amount of money:
Fortune's Alex Taylor III writes, "In trying to combine the benefits of a full hybrid and a conventional gasoline-powered engine, [GM] came up with neither. The car lacks the fuel economy of the former and the efficiency and value of the latter."

Taylor concludes, saying, "Unlike Toyota, which pioneered the full hybrid Prius more than 20 years ago and never wavered, GM has vacillated -- swerving from EVs to hybrids and back again. With its latest effort coming up short by key quantitative standards, the automaker has inadvertently created in the Eco the most disliked car from the first half of 2012."
One can only hope that GM can deliver a more competitive hybrid solution for future vehicles. The company needs to find some middle ground between the Malibu Eco's mediocre powertrain and the fuel-efficiency wizardry of the much more expensive Chevrolet Volt.

Sources: CNN/Fortune, New York Times, The Truth About Cars, Car and Driver

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

The rear....
By Noya on 7/12/2012 5:22:35 AM , Rating: 4
The rear-end is such a mishmash of shapes that it boggles my mind that it made it into production.

RE: The rear....
By FITCamaro on 7/12/2012 7:36:59 AM , Rating: 2
Yeah while I think the front styling looks good since its just a bigger Cruze, the rear looks like they tried to graft a Camaro rearend onto the old Malibu.

RE: The rear....
By MonkeyPaw on 7/12/2012 7:46:48 AM , Rating: 3
Yeah, I'm not a fan either. However, since we both spoke poorly of an American car, we will soon be rated down.

As for most unwanted car, I can think of others that seem more ridiculous. The Smart car or the Nissan Cube for example.

RE: The rear....
By skirvmi on 7/12/2012 11:15:54 AM , Rating: 2
While I agree the Cube and Smart are a couple of the ugliest cars on the market, they both still fulfill a niche and there are people looking for that sort of thing. The Malibu Eco manages to do nothing almost right and look hideous at the same time.

RE: The rear....
By Samus on 7/12/2012 2:34:16 PM , Rating: 2
Aztec. Epic fail in styling and functionality.

RE: The rear....
By JediJeb on 7/12/2012 7:09:22 PM , Rating: 2
The Aztec did look futuristic, well back in the 80's it did.

RE: The rear....
By mmntech on 7/12/2012 11:15:23 AM , Rating: 2
To me, the Malibu has always been the quintessential cheap American car, along with it's younger sibling the Cruze/Cobalt/Cavalier. I drove more than my fair share of them when I worked as a driver. Interiors are strikingly cheap compared to the Fusion and others in its price range. Heavy handling. They had a lot of engine problems too. Had one even blow a piston after 60k km of standard driving. O2 and emissions sensors would fail a lot, causing them to pollute more than usual. So it being listed as the most disliked car is no surprise. The best mid sizes right now IMHO, which I've driven, are the Sonata, Mazda 6, and Fusion in that order. Accord is okay too. Not a fan of the Blandry Camry.

"We are going to continue to work with them to make sure they understand the reality of the Internet.  A lot of these people don't have Ph.Ds, and they don't have a degree in computer science." -- RIM co-CEO Michael Lazaridis

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Yahoo Hacked - Change Your Passwords and Security Info ASAP!
September 23, 2016, 5:45 AM
A is for Apples
September 23, 2016, 5:32 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki