UK Judge Rejects Apple's Patent Claims, Says Galaxy Tab "Not as Cool" as iPad
July 9, 2012 3:40 PM
comment(s) - last by
Ban is rejected, judges say no one is mistaking Samsung's tablets for Apple ones
U.S. Design Patent D504,889
and its corresponding patents in Europe, Australia, and elsewhere have stirred up a lively debate about patent law in relation to competition. The Apple, Inc. (
) design patent contains precious little text, so it's left to Apple's lawyers to interpret it, and is up to international courts to decide how broad the protected design space is.
I. Does D'889 Grant Apple a Monopoly?
Apple claims D'889 is essentially a blank check to a tablet monopoly. While the pictured device in the 2004-era patent:
...has no buttons and is substantially different from the iPad in bezel size and form factor, Apple says none of that matters. It says it has "invented" the minimalist tablet -- in Apple's words a tablet with "slightly rounded corners,'" "a flat transparent surface without any ornamentation," and "a thin profile" -- and that competitors should not be allowed to produce rival designs of any size. The only unspoken exception is
Windows 8 tablets
, as Microsoft Corp. (
) owns a favorable cross-licensing deal with Apple.
In the U.S., Apple's claims of monopoly ownership were backed by the
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
who decided in a May 14th
[PDF] that Apple's design patent was valid and that Samsung infringed on it. The ruling led to
Judge Lucy Koh
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
(San Jose/San Francisco) to institute
a nationwide sales ban
on Samsung Electronics Comp., Ltd.'s (
) Galaxy Tab 10.1, despite her personal opinion that the patent was invalid.
Overseas in Britain, Apple's broad claims met a far different fate. Judge Colin Birss stroked Apple's ego, while offering it a stinging court defeat.
II. UK Judge Rejects Design Infringement Claims
He writes, "[The Galaxy Tab line] do not have the same understated and extreme simplicity which is possessed by the Apple design... They are not as cool."
Despite the kind words, the Judge says that 50+ examples of prior art both in the industry and in fictional works show that Apple's 2004 idea was hardly "original". The Judge considered it ludicrous that Samsung be expected to differentiate the front of its device, given that extra face buttons hinder the user interface and that the hardware form factor is almost entirely constrained by the multi-touch display, an industry standard.
Judge Birss says where tablets need to differentiate themselves is in the back face and profile. He found that "unusual details" on the back of the Samsung devices, as well as a thinner profile, made them trivially distinguishable from the iPad.
The Galaxy Tab (left) is substantially different from the iPad (right) according to a UK Judge.
[Image Source: Gadgets and Gizmos]
In short, he argued that Apple's lawyers were completely wrong in their argument that customers would confuse the Galaxy Tab 10.1 for iPads.
His ruling means that there will be no bans and no damages on a design basis. A London court previously ruled that three of Apple's most-asserted EU technology patents
on the grounds of obviousness and prior art, while a fourth was too narrow to sue Samsung and others.
Apple has 21 days to appeal the ruling to higher courts in the UK. Otherwise it risks a complete loss in its UK efforts to kill Android in court. Such a loss could spell a permanent end to the company's slew of suits in the European Union.
Amid the losses in the EU, Apple's bet at banning the competition may be in the U.S. However, it faces some tough tests, such as
Judge Richard A. Posner
who argues that the U.S. patent system is broken and that Apple is using the broken system to its advantage as a weapon to kill free market competition.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: separated at birth
7/13/2012 2:56:18 AM
I can't believe I have to keep reminding you that their own lawyer - the Samsung lawyer, was asked to point out which was the iPad, and which was the Galaxy Tab.
Would that be true if:
.they look nothing alike.
"Can anyone tell me what MobileMe is supposed to do?... So why the f*** doesn't it do that?" -- Steve Jobs
Report: Samsung RT Windows 8 on ARM (WOA) Tablet to Land in October
July 9, 2012, 1:02 PM
Android Win: Apple Blasted for Trolling, Sees EU Patents Decimated
July 5, 2012, 3:10 PM
Apple Wins Galaxy Tab 10.1 Ban in U.S.
June 27, 2012, 11:28 AM
Air Force Expects to Save Over $50 Million in 10 Years by Using iPads
May 17, 2013, 12:26 PM
Former Intel CEO Regrets Passing Up on iPhone Gravy Train
May 17, 2013, 11:46 AM
Intel-Based Lenovo Yoga 11 Lands, is $240 USD More Expensive Than ARM Version
May 17, 2013, 11:02 AM
Galaxy S IV Looks to Hit 10 Million Sales in Just Four Weeks
May 17, 2013, 10:12 AM
Nintendo Wii U: No EA Games for You!
May 17, 2013, 8:35 AM
Quick Note: CyanogenMod Hits 5 Million Users
May 16, 2013, 1:42 PM
Most Popular Articles
Report: Microsoft Eyes Return to "Dying" Windows 7 Path After Windows 8 Flop
May 13, 2013, 9:50 AM
Windows 8.1 Will Be Free; Microsoft Holds Onto Struggling ARM Variant
May 14, 2013, 2:57 PM
Bill Gates Gets Teary-Eyed While Discussing Steve Jobs, Shows Off Life-Saving Tech on 60 Minutes
May 13, 2013, 12:30 PM
Google Announces "Pure" Galaxy Nexus S4 for $649, Android Updates
May 15, 2013, 1:42 PM
Google's Eric Schmidt: "Don't Be Evil" was Stupid
May 14, 2013, 11:00 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Parents of Pre-Teen Drivers Commonly Practice Distracted Driving Says Study
May 9, 2013, 7:16 AM
Apple's iOS 7 Running Into Internal Delays Due to Massive Overhaul
May 1, 2013, 4:26 PM
Elon Musk Willing to Spend More Money on Widening of 405 Freeway
Apr 26, 2013, 7:28 PM
New $100 Bill Due in October
Apr 24, 2013, 11:52 PM
Volkswagen Shows off iBeetle in Shanghai
Apr 22, 2013, 9:29 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2013 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information