UK Judge Rejects Apple's Patent Claims, Says Galaxy Tab "Not as Cool" as iPad
July 9, 2012 3:40 PM
comment(s) - last by
Ban is rejected, judges say no one is mistaking Samsung's tablets for Apple ones
U.S. Design Patent D504,889
and its corresponding patents in Europe, Australia, and elsewhere have stirred up a lively debate about patent law in relation to competition. The Apple, Inc. (
) design patent contains precious little text, so it's left to Apple's lawyers to interpret it, and is up to international courts to decide how broad the protected design space is.
I. Does D'889 Grant Apple a Monopoly?
Apple claims D'889 is essentially a blank check to a tablet monopoly. While the pictured device in the 2004-era patent:
...has no buttons and is substantially different from the iPad in bezel size and form factor, Apple says none of that matters. It says it has "invented" the minimalist tablet -- in Apple's words a tablet with "slightly rounded corners,'" "a flat transparent surface without any ornamentation," and "a thin profile" -- and that competitors should not be allowed to produce rival designs of any size. The only unspoken exception is
Windows 8 tablets
, as Microsoft Corp. (
) owns a favorable cross-licensing deal with Apple.
In the U.S., Apple's claims of monopoly ownership were backed by the
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
who decided in a May 14th
[PDF] that Apple's design patent was valid and that Samsung infringed on it. The ruling led to
Judge Lucy Koh
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
(San Jose/San Francisco) to institute
a nationwide sales ban
on Samsung Electronics Comp., Ltd.'s (
) Galaxy Tab 10.1, despite her personal opinion that the patent was invalid.
Overseas in Britain, Apple's broad claims met a far different fate. Judge Colin Birss stroked Apple's ego, while offering it a stinging court defeat.
II. UK Judge Rejects Design Infringement Claims
He writes, "[The Galaxy Tab line] do not have the same understated and extreme simplicity which is possessed by the Apple design... They are not as cool."
Despite the kind words, the Judge says that 50+ examples of prior art both in the industry and in fictional works show that Apple's 2004 idea was hardly "original". The Judge considered it ludicrous that Samsung be expected to differentiate the front of its device, given that extra face buttons hinder the user interface and that the hardware form factor is almost entirely constrained by the multi-touch display, an industry standard.
Judge Birss says where tablets need to differentiate themselves is in the back face and profile. He found that "unusual details" on the back of the Samsung devices, as well as a thinner profile, made them trivially distinguishable from the iPad.
The Galaxy Tab (left) is substantially different from the iPad (right) according to a UK Judge.
[Image Source: Gadgets and Gizmos]
In short, he argued that Apple's lawyers were completely wrong in their argument that customers would confuse the Galaxy Tab 10.1 for iPads.
His ruling means that there will be no bans and no damages on a design basis. A London court previously ruled that three of Apple's most-asserted EU technology patents
on the grounds of obviousness and prior art, while a fourth was too narrow to sue Samsung and others.
Apple has 21 days to appeal the ruling to higher courts in the UK. Otherwise it risks a complete loss in its UK efforts to kill Android in court. Such a loss could spell a permanent end to the company's slew of suits in the European Union.
Amid the losses in the EU, Apple's bet at banning the competition may be in the U.S. However, it faces some tough tests, such as
Judge Richard A. Posner
who argues that the U.S. patent system is broken and that Apple is using the broken system to its advantage as a weapon to kill free market competition.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
Broken Patent system
7/11/2012 3:46:40 AM
With patent system this broken I'm surprised Amstrad doesn't sue Apple for copying their PenPad 600
"What would I do? I'd shut it down and give the money back to the shareholders." -- Michael Dell, after being asked what to do with Apple Computer in 1997
Report: Samsung RT Windows 8 on ARM (WOA) Tablet to Land in October
July 9, 2012, 1:02 PM
Android Win: Apple Blasted for Trolling, Sees EU Patents Decimated
July 5, 2012, 3:10 PM
Apple Wins Galaxy Tab 10.1 Ban in U.S.
June 27, 2012, 11:28 AM
AT&T Will Also Receive the HTC One (M8) for Windows
August 19, 2014, 9:27 PM
Sharp's "Edge-to-Edge" AQUOS Crystal Smartphone Coming to Sprint for $239 Off-Contract
August 19, 2014, 7:31 PM
After 34 Years With Microsoft, Steve Ballmer Parts Way to Focus on LA Clippers
August 19, 2014, 4:17 PM
HTC One (M8) for Windows Officially Announced for Verizon Wireless
August 19, 2014, 12:15 PM
Quick Note: ASUS Readies Smartwatch for IFA 2014, Shows Teaser Image
August 19, 2014, 9:30 AM
LG Already Gearing Up for G Watch Sequel Next Month
August 19, 2014, 7:54 AM
Most Popular Articles
Lumia 830 Gets Major Upgrades Including New 20.1 Megapixel Toshiba Sensor
August 15, 2014, 6:00 PM
With USB Type-C Spec Finalized, Reversible Cables Will Soon Be Upon Us
August 13, 2014, 8:46 AM
Windows Phone, BlackBerry Smartphone Market Share Falls to 2.5%, 0.5% Respectively
August 15, 2014, 9:44 AM
Update: Samsung Gets Official With 4.7”, Aluminum-frame Galaxy Alpha Smartphone
August 14, 2014, 8:56 AM
GM Concedes That the Cadillac ELR Doesn’t Really Compete with the Tesla Model S
August 15, 2014, 5:42 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Space Terrorism is a Looming Threat For the United States
Apr 23, 2014, 7:47 PM
Facebook Aims to Provide Internet to "Every Person in the World" with Drones, Satellites
Apr 1, 2014, 10:20 AM
Retail Mobile Sites Experience Outages in Light of Simplexity's Bankruptcy
Mar 14, 2014, 8:48 AM
Tesla vs. BMW: Who Has the Safer EV?
Feb 1, 2014, 2:56 PM
Justice Leaks Details of Next HTC One Two Flagship Phone
Dec 5, 2013, 4:04 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information