UK Judge Rejects Apple's Patent Claims, Says Galaxy Tab "Not as Cool" as iPad
July 9, 2012 3:40 PM
comment(s) - last by
Ban is rejected, judges say no one is mistaking Samsung's tablets for Apple ones
U.S. Design Patent D504,889
and its corresponding patents in Europe, Australia, and elsewhere have stirred up a lively debate about patent law in relation to competition. The Apple, Inc. (
) design patent contains precious little text, so it's left to Apple's lawyers to interpret it, and is up to international courts to decide how broad the protected design space is.
I. Does D'889 Grant Apple a Monopoly?
Apple claims D'889 is essentially a blank check to a tablet monopoly. While the pictured device in the 2004-era patent:
...has no buttons and is substantially different from the iPad in bezel size and form factor, Apple says none of that matters. It says it has "invented" the minimalist tablet -- in Apple's words a tablet with "slightly rounded corners,'" "a flat transparent surface without any ornamentation," and "a thin profile" -- and that competitors should not be allowed to produce rival designs of any size. The only unspoken exception is
Windows 8 tablets
, as Microsoft Corp. (
) owns a favorable cross-licensing deal with Apple.
In the U.S., Apple's claims of monopoly ownership were backed by the
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
who decided in a May 14th
[PDF] that Apple's design patent was valid and that Samsung infringed on it. The ruling led to
Judge Lucy Koh
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
(San Jose/San Francisco) to institute
a nationwide sales ban
on Samsung Electronics Comp., Ltd.'s (
) Galaxy Tab 10.1, despite her personal opinion that the patent was invalid.
Overseas in Britain, Apple's broad claims met a far different fate. Judge Colin Birss stroked Apple's ego, while offering it a stinging court defeat.
II. UK Judge Rejects Design Infringement Claims
He writes, "[The Galaxy Tab line] do not have the same understated and extreme simplicity which is possessed by the Apple design... They are not as cool."
Despite the kind words, the Judge says that 50+ examples of prior art both in the industry and in fictional works show that Apple's 2004 idea was hardly "original". The Judge considered it ludicrous that Samsung be expected to differentiate the front of its device, given that extra face buttons hinder the user interface and that the hardware form factor is almost entirely constrained by the multi-touch display, an industry standard.
Judge Birss says where tablets need to differentiate themselves is in the back face and profile. He found that "unusual details" on the back of the Samsung devices, as well as a thinner profile, made them trivially distinguishable from the iPad.
The Galaxy Tab (left) is substantially different from the iPad (right) according to a UK Judge.
[Image Source: Gadgets and Gizmos]
In short, he argued that Apple's lawyers were completely wrong in their argument that customers would confuse the Galaxy Tab 10.1 for iPads.
His ruling means that there will be no bans and no damages on a design basis. A London court previously ruled that three of Apple's most-asserted EU technology patents
on the grounds of obviousness and prior art, while a fourth was too narrow to sue Samsung and others.
Apple has 21 days to appeal the ruling to higher courts in the UK. Otherwise it risks a complete loss in its UK efforts to kill Android in court. Such a loss could spell a permanent end to the company's slew of suits in the European Union.
Amid the losses in the EU, Apple's bet at banning the competition may be in the U.S. However, it faces some tough tests, such as
Judge Richard A. Posner
who argues that the U.S. patent system is broken and that Apple is using the broken system to its advantage as a weapon to kill free market competition.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: separated at birth
7/10/2012 4:57:09 PM
now they want the exact same thing in their Android tablets.
And because you know what people want? LOL...
You have absolutely no clue what people want....
And no SHIT the pre-ipad are different, the TECHNOLOGY was different and didn't really ALLOW for tablets to be as they are NOW...
Are you really this thick headed? Seriously?
You are slowly starting to slip into TS, TG, Pirks territory.
"i am not defending apple"....bullllllllllllllshit....
"Well, we didn't have anyone in line that got shot waiting for our system." -- Nintendo of America Vice President Perrin Kaplan
Report: Samsung RT Windows 8 on ARM (WOA) Tablet to Land in October
July 9, 2012, 1:02 PM
Android Win: Apple Blasted for Trolling, Sees EU Patents Decimated
July 5, 2012, 3:10 PM
Apple Wins Galaxy Tab 10.1 Ban in U.S.
June 27, 2012, 11:28 AM
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
The Samsung Galaxy S7
September 14, 2016, 6:00 AM
Apple Watch 2 – Coming September 7th
September 3, 2016, 6:30 AM
Apple says “See you on the 7th.”
September 1, 2016, 6:30 AM
Apple sued because of iPhone 6 Touch Disease
August 31, 2016, 7:00 AM
Get Ready to wait in line – iPhone 7 due September.
August 18, 2016, 7:15 AM
Most Popular Articles
Are you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Yahoo Hacked - Change Your Passwords and Security Info ASAP!
September 23, 2016, 5:45 AM
A is for Apples
September 23, 2016, 5:32 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Burlington Gun Attack
Sep 27, 2016, 5:00 AM
Who is in Risk of Getting Oral Cancer?
Sep 23, 2016, 6:02 AM
France Bans Plastic Eating Utensils in Restaurants
Sep 18, 2016, 10:49 AM
Progress Against Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Sep 17, 2016, 5:30 AM
Apple Watch Series 2 - Number 1 in the Customer Satisfaction.
Sep 7, 2016, 6:19 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information