backtop


Print 32 comment(s) - last by kkwst2.. on Jul 15 at 11:17 AM


  (Source: i.i.com)
The new Kindle Fire's resolution will be 1280x800

The tech world has had tablet fever over the last few months with the release of Apple's new iPad, Microsoft's Surface tablet announcement, and Google's upcoming Nexus 7 tablet. Amazon's next-generation Kindle Fire will be another new addition to the tablet arena soon, and as that time nears, more and more details continue to leak.

AllThingsD has managed to get its hands on some new information regarding Amazon's successor to the original Kindle Fire, which was released last November. These changes include the resolution, the display's width-to-height ratio, and the weight.

The new Kindle Fire's resolution will be 1280x800, which is a 67 percent increase in total pixels from the original Fire's 1024x600 pixel resolution. This gives the new display a pixels per inch (PPI) of 216. Also, the pixel density is 29 percent greater in the newest version.

Despite the increase in resolution, the battery life won't take a huge hit. Analysts say it is nowhere near the iPad's jump from 1024x768 to 2048x1536, so the battery life should remain only mildly affected.

The new Kindle Fire will also be thinner and lighter than its predecessor, and will even have a different display width-to-height ratio. The current aspect ratio of the original Kindle Fire is 1.71, which is a tall, Portrait mode display. The upcoming Kindle Fire has an aspect ratio of 1.60.

As previously reported, the new Kindle Fire will have a built-in camera and external volume controls.

Originally, many reports indicated a July release for the new Kindle Fire. However, AllThingsD said that a late Q3 2012 release is more likely.

In other Amazon-related news, the company is set to launch its own smartphone in November. Amazon is working with Foxconn International Holdings Ltd. to make the new device, and it is protecting itself with wireless technology patents that will keep predators like Apple away once it enters the smartphone arena. Amazon could use a smartphone of its own to further push its digital songs, books and movies as well as other Amazon-related services.

Source: All Things D



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Not to be Debbie Downer
By Neodude007 on 7/9/2012 12:38:30 PM , Rating: 3
But this tablet seems fairly irrelevant to people who somewhat know what they are looking for in tablets. You can get all the Amazon stuff on a straight Google tablet such as the pretty amazing sounding 7 inch one coming out for $200 so why would anybody get this which might be all ghetto like the original Fire, running some half baked ancient modded version of Android???

Just sayin.




RE: Not to be Debbie Downer
By Yojimbo on 7/9/2012 12:41:41 PM , Rating: 2
isn't it cheaper?


RE: Not to be Debbie Downer
By Yojimbo on 7/9/2012 12:42:41 PM , Rating: 2
except for maybe that 7 inch one.. isn't it bigger?


RE: Not to be Debbie Downer
By GulWestfale on 7/9/2012 12:50:25 PM , Rating: 3
you don't buy this as a tablet, you buy it as an amazon tablet. the difference being that it is tied into amazon's media offerings, like their music, movie, and bookstores.

of course, you can get all that on a bigger tablet, too; but for amazon customers who want to have seamless user experience, this thing (especially at 200 bucks) is hard to beat.


RE: Not to be Debbie Downer
By quiksilvr on 7/9/2012 2:00:45 PM , Rating: 2
I don't see how this isn't possible to get on the Nexus 7. Amazon Appstore, Amazon Mobile, Amazon MP3, Kindle, it's all there. The only thing I can think of is Amazon Instant Video isn't an app on Google Play; you have to open your browser and go to the flash player for it. This wouldn't be a problem but Adobe is dropping Flash support for 4.1, so you're kinda screwed.

So, in short, get the Kindle Fire if you use Amazon Instant Video alot, otherwise get the Nexus.


RE: Not to be Debbie Downer
By othercents on 7/13/2012 9:03:30 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
So, in short, get the Kindle Fire if you use Amazon Instant Video alot, otherwise get the Nexus.


Actually you get a Kindle Fire if you read books a lot. I think the majority of the people who get the Kindle Fire are getting them to read books on a device that also has other Amazon features like music, web, video, apps, etc. These people are also purchasing them as gift for children to allow them to read books and still have some web and games.

The integration with Amazon on the Kindle Fire is much slicker than using a standard Android device. For the majority of the population that isn't technically savy (and don't have an iPad already) this is probably the device for you. For me, my HP Touchpad works nice on Android 4.0.

BTW. Who said the Kindle Fire would be 4.1? I suspect 4.0, but they could stick with 2.3.


RE: Not to be Debbie Downer
By kkwst2 on 7/15/2012 11:17:24 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
BTW. Who said the Kindle Fire would be 4.1? I suspect 4.0, but they could stick with 2.3.


Nobody. He was saying that the Nexus on 4.1 might not be able to do Amazon Instant Video. I would spit my coffee if the new Fire is not still based off of 2.x.


RE: Not to be Debbie Downer
By Sazabi19 on 7/9/2012 12:53:03 PM , Rating: 2
the Nexus 7 (Asus made, pure Google Android experience) will be running Android 4.1 (Jellybean) and sells for $200 for the 8 gig and $250 for the 16 gig. It is a 7" display as well with the same resolution as this new Amazon device. If the new Fire is using a forked version of Android I see absolutely no reason to get one over the Nexus 7. It will come out later, cost the same, and have less. The only thing the Nexus 7 is missing that I want is memory expansion (Micro SD), other than that I am looking at them, Tegra 3 inside the little beast? Sure :)


RE: Not to be Debbie Downer
By GulWestfale on 7/9/2012 1:41:23 PM , Rating: 3
there is also no logical, hardware reason to buy an ipad instead of a cheaper, faster, more open android tablet, but people still buy plenty of ipads. it's the user experience, and apple's marketing might that sells them, not what processor is inside. my sister in law recently bought an iphone and had no idea about what screen resolution even is, or how to enable siri (or what it's even for...) all she cared about is that it's easy to use and looks cool.


RE: Not to be Debbie Downer
By Cypherdude1 on 7/9/2012 4:30:47 PM , Rating: 2
Actually, there is a reason to buy an expensive iPad over a (much) cheaper android-based tablet: The iPad has built-in a cellular-based internet connection or 4G. For a professional who needs to be constantly connected while on the road or onsite, an extra $400 is not that much more:
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00746VKG6


RE: Not to be Debbie Downer
By Spuke on 7/9/2012 5:46:19 PM , Rating: 2
More than that, if you just want a bigger, high resolution screen, get the iPad,


RE: Not to be Debbie Downer
By Neodude007 on 7/9/2012 12:55:35 PM , Rating: 1
From the very little detail provided here (simply a resolution and ratio) I am assuming it will be $200 again and still 7 inches since it is supposed to trick people in to thinking it is an e-reader size so you can carry it.

All I am saying is if there is a Nexus product same size, probably better specs, why the hell would you get one that Amazon had modified?

It might be somewhat of an Apple-ish thing where certain consumers want to turn it on and be looking at a weird bookshelf GUI or something since they can't figure out how to use a normal app shortcut to open the Kindle App...lol. Oh people crack us all up.


RE: Not to be Debbie Downer
By nafhan on 7/9/2012 2:23:12 PM , Rating: 2
As far as I can tell, we know a possible screen resolution for the new Kindle, and that's it. Anything else is speculation. My speculation is that it will be basically identical to the Nexus 7 in all other respects, too (including updated OS).

That said, I'll pick vanilla Android over the Kindle's OS any day, but many people are not that worried about the differences, and will happily just buy what they see on the frontpage of Amazon.com


RE: Not to be Debbie Downer
By Adam M on 7/9/2012 5:23:34 PM , Rating: 2
If this new Fire doesn't offer full access to Google Play I would be better off with any other tablet because I would still have access to everything Amazon has to offer as well as some of my favorite apps that aren't available in the Amazon store. I don't care what they "improve" on the Fire, it's still a pass.


By TakinYourPoints on 7/9/2012 6:05:38 PM , Rating: 3
Except that stuff doesn't matter. The Kindle Fire is the only tablet outside of the iPad that has sold anything worth talking about, everything else has tanked in comparison.

Total vertical integration is very appealing to tablet users, that is one reason why the Fire has done well. The other reason is that it is on the front page of Amazon.com, huge marketing push.

IMHO the Fire is still not a good product, and this is coming from a HUGE Kindle fanboy. The hardware doesn't feel good, I don't care for the UI, and performance is sluggish. That said, they can certainly improve upon all of these things while keeping the price low as time goes on. The increase in display resolution is one step.

There's no reason they can't dominate the low end while Apple maintains the high end. I don't know where all of the other tablet manufacturers will end up.


"I'm an Internet expert too. It's all right to wire the industrial zone only, but there are many problems if other regions of the North are wired." -- North Korean Supreme Commander Kim Jong-il














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki