backtop


Print 35 comment(s) - last by testerguy.. on Jul 29 at 8:00 PM


Kurt Eichenwald  (Source: nymag.com)
Stack ranking and the inability to move up to new technologies were Microsoft's largest problems

Vanity Fair's contributing editor Kurt Eichenwald analyzed what he calls Microsoft's "lost decade," where a few bad management decisions led to the company's fall starting in the year 2000. Eichenwald used internal corporate records, interviews and emails between Microsoft executives to dictate his analysis.

From the information Eichenwald reviewed, he found that Microsoft made a couple of huge mistakes that led to its fall in the tech rankings: stack ranking and the inability to move up to new technologies.

After dozens of interviews with employees, Eichenwald discovered that Microsoft had been using a stack ranking management technique that put a lot of pressure on employees. Stack ranking means that each unit has a certain percentage of employees that are identified as top workers, good workers, average workers and poor workers. In other words, if there is a unit of 10 employees, it's understood that two people would be designated the top workers while seven employees would receive good or average reviews and the last one would get a poor review.

Using this stack ranking technique not only put a lot of pressure on employees, but also made employees want to compete with one another instead of other companies.

"It was always much less about how I could become a better engineer and much more about my need to improve my visibility among other managers," said Ed McCahill, a former Microsoft marketing manager for 16 years.

Microsoft also failed to take on new technological opportunities, such as the e-reader it developed back in 1998. A Microsoft team created the portable e-reader and presented it to Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, but Gates was not impressed. He said the user interface didn't look enough like Windows. The idea was scrapped, and the team was removed from the reporting line to Gates.

Amazon later introduced the Kindle e-reader in 2007, which turned out to be a hit. Amazon now has an entire line of Kindle e-readers as well as the Kindle Fire tablet, and other companies like Barnes & Noble have released their own tablets as well (NOOK). It wasn't until April of this year that Microsoft embraced e-readers by teaming up with Barnes & Noble to create an e-book subsidiary called Newco.

While Microsoft has seen tremendous success with other releases during the supposed "lost decade" -- such as Windows XP, Windows 7, Xbox 360 and Kinect -- it doesn't seem to be enough to pass competitors like Apple. In fact, the iPhone alone brings in more revenue than all of Microsoft's products combined.

But Microsoft is looking ahead to its upcoming Windows 8 operating system and Windows Phone 8 for a boost. The new Metro user interface is unlike any Microsoft Windows release to date, and has been a topic of debate. Some feel it strays too far from the original Windows theme while others praise the change. The 10.6-inch Surface tablet, which Microsoft announced last month, is also an anticipated addition to the company's family of gadgets.
 

Source: Vanity Fair



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: They expect it to change now?
By tayb on 7/10/2012 11:18:23 AM , Rating: 2
Thank you for perfectly illustrating my point. The ribbon has been hugely successful and the ONLY point who don't like it are people who can't handle change. Take any NEW user to excel, show them the OLD interface, and then show them the NEW interface, and ask them which one they prefer. It's not even a question, the ribbon will win every time. Menu's are clunky, annoying, and static. The ribbon was a HUGE upgrade.

Some people just can't handle change. Do you really think Microsoft gives a crap about the teeny minority of people who don't want their UI to EVER change?? Seriously??


By dark matter on 7/10/2012 2:59:45 PM , Rating: 2
You make an excellent point. If you just "show" them the ribbon they will chose that over the menus.

However when it comes to using the product the ribbon gets in the way.

Don't forget, the ribbon was designed to help people discover things. And it is good, for new users.

However as a business I don't employ "new users", I employ people with experience at doing a job.

Likewise Windows 8, why would I train my users (at my expense) to do things differently, just for the sake of difference itself. The new start screen does nothing for productivity, all it does is introduce costs.

Likewise the ribbon over the menu. Sure, it's great to look at, but when you're using it day in day out for years, it's worse than the menu.


"Google fired a shot heard 'round the world, and now a second American company has answered the call to defend the rights of the Chinese people." -- Rep. Christopher H. Smith (R-N.J.)














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki