backtop


Print 114 comment(s) - last by rdhood.. on Jul 10 at 11:00 AM


  (Source: Microsoft)
Any version of Windows XP, Vista, or 7 will be eligible for inexpensive upgrade

Say what you will about its touch reforms, and extreme user interface makeover, but Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) is at least moving aggressively to give its customers a favorable price point.

To counter Apple, Inc.'s (AAPL) $19.99 USD Mountain Lion licensing, Microsoft is offering Windows 8 "Pro" for only $39.99 USD via download.  A DVD version will be available for $69.99 USD (that's one expensive disc).  Clearly Microsoft is trying to funnel customers to its online process, which it hopes will lead to a more pain-free and automated installation.

Comments Microsoft:

We believe that your upgrade experience in Windows 8 will be a breeze by offering a faster experience, a single upgrade path, and compatibility from prior versions of Windows. We’ve continued to listen to our customers and have expanded the ability to download to over 100 countries and 37 languages. We have simplified the Windows upgrade experience with the Windows 8 Upgrade Assistant which supports you during your upgrade with everything from selecting your language to pausing your download to built-in compatibility checks - it’s seamless. And if you’re an enthusiast you will have the flexibility to download and control how you upgrade.

Somewhat strangely Microsoft is offering customers who purchase the download the option to purchase a backup DVD for $15.  In other words you can order the download and get a DVD via the backup option for $54.99 USD, or pay $15 USD extra to buy it in store.

It seems a bit counterintuitive, to say the least.

Of course if you want to snag a download or disc install be sure to first check that your hardware is capable of running Windows 8.  To test that you can grab Microsoft's Release Preview of Windows 8 from here, which comes with a test-phase build of the upgrade assitant.

Windows Team engineer Brandon LeBlanc writes Microsoft is continuing to "drive toward the RTM milestone."

Source: Windows Team Blog



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Nope.
By Motoman on 7/2/2012 5:20:41 PM , Rating: 0
quote:
I don't understand why people cry about the Start button, in Windows 8 you get all your icons on the main screen


...so I'm going to have a couple hundred icons on my main screen? You think that's an improvement over the Start menu?

If so, you're horrifically stupid. The Metrosexual UI is a catastrophically bad idea for traditional computers. Phones and tablets? Fine. Not really any different from iOS or Android as far as I can tell. But for a real computer? GTFO.

The Start menu is the best possible way to organize and gain access to all the programs you may install on your computer. It can't be improved upon. MS is trying to be edgy or something by removing the Start menu - all they're doing is proving how wildly out of touch with reality they are.


RE: Nope.
By Florinator on 7/2/12, Rating: 0
RE: Nope.
By aftlizard on 7/2/2012 5:43:44 PM , Rating: 2
You know its really not that hard to right click and select show all apps on Metro UI. Thats essentially the same as the start menu(and of course you can add or remove apps to the start screen at any time). If you want an easier option..just do a search. Thats all I ever used the start button for anyways, that and the calculator app.


RE: Nope.
By sviola on 7/2/2012 6:29:48 PM , Rating: 2
So, do you navigate a couple hundred icons on the start menu? There's a lot of productivity lost there...or do you use the search box (which has been improved for Windows 8)?


RE: Nope.
By Motoman on 7/2/2012 7:28:01 PM , Rating: 2
I have never used the search box - ever. It's infinitely faster to use the fly-out menu and click on what I need than it would be to remove my hand from the mouse and type it in and wait for a search. I know of no one who ever uses the search box. If MS wanted to get rid of something, get rid of that.


RE: Nope.
By ShaolinSoccer on 7/2/2012 8:47:11 PM , Rating: 2
lol, you may save 1 second. that's about it...


RE: Nope.
By Motoman on 7/3/2012 11:48:51 AM , Rating: 2
...then what is the point of doing something that takes more effort and costs you even just one second of extra time?

Your way is worse. You just admitted so. So why do it?


RE: Nope.
By noirsoft on 7/2/2012 11:09:11 PM , Rating: 2
I've gotta call it. You are just stupid or trolling. It is far from "infinitely faster" -- in fact, it is demonstrably faster to move to the keyboard(which you are already on if you hit the windows key to start your program search) and type "maya" than to navigate to All Programs/Autodesk/Maya 2008/Maya

Plus, if you do that a lot, it's faster still to pin to the taskbar.

You also must know no one, because anyone who knows about start search prefers it and uses it all the time.


RE: Nope.
By Motoman on 7/3/2012 11:47:28 AM , Rating: 2
You're catastrophically wrong. All my friends work for major software companies, like IBM. I even ran a quick poll around to get other opinions...not a single person thinks it's anything but moronic to search for a program when you already know where it is...taking your hand off the mouse to do so, and wasting more time.

It takes less time to use the Start menu and launch the program with the mouse, period, end of story. When you want to go to a website, do you go to Google and search for "www.website.com" too? Pretty much the same thing.

You're wasting time, and there's no way around that fact.


RE: Nope.
By Newspapercrane on 7/3/2012 3:31:20 PM , Rating: 2
Perhaps it is moronic to search when you know where something is when you've spent half of your life memorizing exactly where all of your programs are in your start menu. Personally, I haven't a slightest clue how things are arranged in "All Programs" on my desktop these days. Hit the windows key, and type the first few letters of what you want and then use the arrow keys to get to it if there are multiple reults. Hit enter. That's it. Anything that I use often enough to warrant it gets pinned to the start menu, or if I use it even more often it get's pinned to the task bar.

Also, because your friends work for "Major software companies, like IBM" does not make them experts on software usability. I'm sure if you actually even asked them the question, the way in which you asked was horribly slanted toward your opinion. Try observing their workflows sometime, I'm sure you'll find something diffent.

When I want to go to a website I start typing the address in the bar and then select it from the suggestions that pop up. That's actually the same thing. Much faster than going through three favorites menu's to find the link.


RE: Nope.
By Spuke on 7/2/2012 7:02:25 PM , Rating: 2
You actually have a couple hundred icons on your screen? And you're calling other people stupid? LOL! Maybe you should rethink that Moto. You know how many icons I have on my screen? Three. Most used apps pinned on the taskbar. I wouldn't mind have those most used apps be my start screen. I also use the Library which works fantastic for finding my data. That's pinned by default. Clean, easy to use. I guess Win8 was designed for at least one person here. LOL!


RE: Nope.
By Motoman on 7/2/2012 7:29:34 PM , Rating: 2
You might want to take Reading Comprehension 101 again.

I don't have a couple hundred icons on my screen. And I don't want them. Which is why, like anyone with a brain in their head, I want the Start menu to stay.

Like you, I typically have only a handful of items on my desktop. But I have assloads of programs installed on my computer, and the Start menu is the best possible way to organize and navigate them.


RE: Nope.
By Spuke on 7/3/2012 12:33:31 PM , Rating: 1
quote:
But I have assloads of programs installed on my computer, and the Start menu is the best possible way to organize and navigate them.
I reread what you said and I read it wrong. Still, I disagree. I find that using the Start button takes too many steps and uses too much time. At work, I either pin my most used or put my less than most used on my desktop. Much quiker than Start button, wait, All programs, wait, app, wait, subfolder, wait (I use CAD apps where you might have multiple apps under folders). With Win8, I can have all of those (most and lesser used apps) on the my start screen. Makes that task even quicker (don't have to Show Desktop for the lesser used apps). More productive for me and probably many others (cause none of us are unique...but that's another thread). I can understand something not working for you (and the general bitchiness for new Microsoft stuff that will die down in about 2 years) but how is that stupid?


"A politician stumbles over himself... Then they pick it out. They edit it. He runs the clip, and then he makes a funny face, and the whole audience has a Pavlovian response." -- Joe Scarborough on John Stewart over Jim Cramer














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki