backtop


Print 12 comment(s) - last by chippyles.. on Jul 7 at 7:58 AM


  (Source: Time and Date)
Enjoy the heat for one extra second

Scientists at the National Physical Laboratory (NPL) gave summer lovers a gift yesterday when it added an extra second of time to its atomic clocks at precisely 59 seconds after midnight.

The extra second was needed to keep the atomic clock-based international time standard on pace with the Earth's fickle spin.  The problem is that the Earth does not rotate at a steady rate.  But according to the basis of mankind's notion of time, the sun should be midway overhead at noon.  To keep these two measures from diverging, the NPL at Teddington, United Kingdom must borrow or lend from the time bank at times to keep the two synchronized.

Peter Whibberley, Senior Research Scientist in NPL's Time and Frequency Group, comments, "The purpose of leap seconds is to make sure our time scale based on atomic clocks remains in step with the time based on the Earth's rotation. The Earth is a poor timekeeper compared to our clocks, and its rotation changes unpredictably due to changes in its atmosphere and molten core. The leap second correction to our atomic clocks means we get an extra second of summer time."

But before critics cry out about "ivory tower" academics and their trivialities, there are actually serious requirements that drive these adjustments.  Since the 1960s, scientific researchers have used the Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) as the "official" Earth time.  That time is based on multiple precisely synchronized atomic clocks.  The UTC is the primary time which satellites and time-dependent scientific experiments are synced to.
Satellites
Precisely synchronized time is necessary to keep the wealth of satellites healthy and communicating. [Image Source: Orbitcast]

At the same time, many scientists and engineers rely on the time as a reliable reflection of astronomical events, so the atomic clock UTC time must be kept in lock-step with the astronomic time.  If the two fall out of sync, experiments and commercial ventures could go badly awry.  As they say, timing is everything.

Despite the benefits, some would rather hold off on adding leap seconds, waiting until larger discrepancies before making an adjustment.  The U.S. government is among the critics of the leap second.  They argue that leap seconds create timing difficulties for computer systems -- much like the infamous "Y2K" dilemma.

The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is currently debating a U.S.-led proposal to scrap the leap second.  But that debate was shelved until 2015.

In the meantime, the International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service (IERS) voted that this summer's leap second would go ahead just as planned.

Source: NPL



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Ridiculous
By Newspapercrane on 7/2/2012 4:08:26 PM , Rating: 5
This is just ANOTHER great example of Mick's pure Anti-rotational Agenda here on Dailytech. This article is nothing but JM Trollbait to increase dailytech ad revenue! It's so biased against the Earth's rotation it's not even funny.

You make me sick, Mick.




RE: Ridiculous
By chmilz on 7/2/2012 5:09:06 PM , Rating: 3
We need some man-made rotational brakes, lest out pursuit to make the world static and unchanging should fail completely.

Seriously though, when we meet other intelligent life our concept of time will get a swift kick to the testicles.


RE: Ridiculous
By TSS on 7/2/2012 10:13:45 PM , Rating: 2
Well you're just a shill for the banks! Can't you see that printing too much time was the problem in the first place?! If this goes on, we'll have a deflationary crisis and we'll go back to the dark ages!


RE: Ridiculous
By inperfectdarkness on 7/3/2012 8:09:09 AM , Rating: 2
lol!

If you think about it though, it's no wonder that the earth is so hard to predict. It's moving through 3 distinct motions at any given point in time (spin, orbit, wobble), and our solar system is itself not a fixed constant within the galaxy or universe. Even the moon has an effect on the rotation and movement of earth.

Factor in other phenomenon such as unpredictable solar activity and its effect on earth's magnetic fields...and you end up with a model so complex that it's as difficult to predict as the weather.


Indeed
By Gondor on 7/2/2012 4:49:33 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
They argue that leap seconds create timing difficulties for computer systems -- much like the infamous "Y2K" dilemma.


I can confirm that. There have been several computer service outages during the weekend thanks to the leap second, servers misbehaving or crashing for no apparent reason. I'm actually surprised that there haven't been more reports of problems made yet ... maybe because it's only Monday ;-)

Anyway, now that we're aware of timing intricacies it should be easy to fix the potential issues.




RE: Indeed
By Ammohunt on 7/2/2012 5:17:38 PM , Rating: 5
we are working on those issues..gimmie a second..


RE: Indeed
By Ramstark on 7/3/2012 11:58:17 AM , Rating: 2
+6 on this one!! LOLOL


RE: Indeed
By chippyles on 7/7/2012 7:58:09 AM , Rating: 2
Have you tried rebooting?


Summer...??????/
By croc on 7/3/2012 12:16:55 AM , Rating: 3
Once again, we in the Southern Hemisphere get short shrift.




RE: Summer...??????/
By LSUJester on 7/3/2012 1:06:41 AM , Rating: 4
Everyone knows that the Southern Hemisphere doesn't rotate the same way that the Northern does. If you guys would fix your half of the earth, we wouldn't have this problem.


RE: Summer...??????/
By impinchi on 7/3/2012 5:51:53 AM , Rating: 2
roflol (from the southern hemisphere) +1


By drycrust3 on 7/3/2012 11:33:32 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is currently debating a U.S.-led proposal to scrap the leap second. But that debate was shelved until 2015.

The problem with this approach is that everyday the world is becoming more and more computerised, and there are more and more systems that rely on very specific timing, and most commonly available software isn't set up to handle this. For example, say you are using a spreadsheet to analyse lap times of a car race, how many spreadsheets could handle a lap time of 1 minute and 60.923 seconds? Most can't, they will produce an error. In the case of a car race it could mean those cars that complete a lap in 1 minute and 60 seconds could be thought of as not having completed a lap by the computer, meaning they suddenly are recorded as being one lap behind everyone else.
If the idea is to synchronise clocks with the earth, and the earth's rotation is uneven, the surely the should also be "unleap seconds" too?




"You can bet that Sony built a long-term business plan about being successful in Japan and that business plan is crumbling." -- Peter Moore, 24 hours before his Microsoft resignation

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2013 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki