Apple Wins Galaxy Tab 10.1 Ban in U.S.
June 27, 2012 11:28 AM
comment(s) - last by
Loss may necessitate Samsung to switch to 10.1N design, was primarily on the "strength" of Apple's design patent
Apple, Inc. (
) has struggled in its "thermonuclear" legal war against Android in recent weeks. It saw
Judge Richard A. Posner
Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals
judge who moonlighted in the
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois
(Chicago), first toss its suit against Motorola Mobility (a Google Inc. (
out of court
"with prejudice", then
refuse any injunction sales bans
of Motorola Mobility's phones.
I. Persistence Pays Off -- Sort Of
But Apple keeps plugging away at its lawsuit efforts and it was rewarded this week when
Judge Lucy Koh
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
(San Jose/San Francisco) awarded Apple a sales ban (preliminary injunction) on Samsung Electronics Comp., Ltd.'s (
) Galaxy Tab 10.1.
The ruling, which does not apply to other Samsung tablets, comes after a Dec. 2011 ruling where Judge Koh
refused to grant an injunction
In that opinion, she argued that the Android operating system (designed by Google) on Samsung's tablet likely infringed on Apple's technology patents. She also wrote that while the Tab 10.1 likely did infringe on Apple's iPad design patent --
U.S. Design Patent D504,889
-- that 2004 patent was likely invalid
due to prior art
. Thus she refused to grant an injunction, funneling the case towards a jury trial.
Apple's D'889 patent [Image Source: Google Patents]
Apple appealed, and the U.S. Court of Appeals heard the case for the Federal Circuit -- a higher court. That court's May 14th
[PDF] confirmed Judge Koh's finding of design infringement, but rejected her finding of invalidity, ruling that the Apple patent did not infringe on prior art, such as designs seen in fictional works like
2001: A Space Odyssey
The case was sent back to Judge Koh who was forced to now grant a preliminary injunction given the sweeping infringement findings. After both sides filed their briefs, Judge Koh issued a ruling on June 26, with Apple emerging victorious:
Galaxy Tab Injunction Ruling
In the ruling she concludes, "For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Apple’s motion for a preliminary injunction and ENJOINS the sale of the Galaxy Tab 10.1 tablet computer."
II. Damage to Samsung Will Likely be Minimal
So where does this leave Samsung? First Samsung's tablet sales in the U.S.
have been lackluster
, so the injunction isn't a major blow to the company's profitability, particularly given that only a single model is banned out of Samsung's large lineup.
Samsung has a whole lineup of smaller tablets, which have not yet been banned.
[Image Source: Ubergizmo]
Samsung is actually financially fortunate that Judge Koh
rejected Apple's attempt
ban the launch
of the flagship
Galaxy S III phone
, as that would be vastly more costly to Samsung's revenue.
Apple has posted a $2.6M USD bond to enforce the ban. Enforcement usually takes a couple of weeks to be put in place. In the meantime Samsung is likely to swap out its Galaxy Tab 10.1, with the Galaxy Tab 10.1N, which it designed to skirt a similar ban. The Galaxy Tab 10.1N adds more distinctive differences from Apple's design.
Samsung has also appealed the injunction. Its lawyers issued a statement,
, "Apple sought a preliminary injunction of Samsung’s Galaxy Tab 10.1, based on a single design patent that addressed just one aspect of the product’s overall design. Should Apple continue to make legal claims based on such a generic design patent, design innovation and progress in the industry could be restricted."
III. Bans in Other Regions Have Been Successfully Overturned
This isn't exactly new territory for Samsung. This is actually the third time a large market has banned the Galaxy Tab 10.1 due to Apple's design claims. Samsung successfully reversed both bans.
it reversed the ban by offering up the
Galaxy Tab 10.1N
, which redesigns the case to look even less like the iPad. Apple tried to re-ban that design, but a court rejected its attempt, arguing the new design looked nothing like Apple's patent design.
In Australia, Samsung merely appealed
to a higher court, which found that the lower judge had ruled inappropriately. In a
stern rebuke it reversed the judge's ruling
, allowing the base Galaxy Tab 10.1 to be "unbanned" and return to the market.
Given those successes, it seems unlikely that Apple will be able to prevent Samsung from selling 10-inch tablets, even in the short term. Apple's spokeswoman claims Apple is merely trying to protect its patented designs. However, it's pretty hard to believe that anyone truly mistook a Galaxy Tab for an iPad, or bought it because it "looked like an iPad."
There's no hope of this dispute reaching a settlement, after
talks between the two company's CEOs
in Northern California District Court
. Instead, the case will be going before a jury next month. The Jury will hear Apple's
case against Samsung
, both of which were filed in April 2011.
Judge Koh has
limited both companies
to 25 hours of testimony and 125 exhibits each. She says to allow them to spend as much time as their lawyers wanted would be to subject jurors to "cruel and unusual punishment".
U.S. District Court, Northern District of California [Scribd]
All Things D
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
6/28/2012 5:48:33 AM
Actually, it's both.
Both trade dress and design patents can exist in the case of a car since it's both 'ornamental' and also distinguishes the source of the goods to consumer.
My original point stands.
6/28/2012 5:51:18 AM
And actually, your comment should go to the guy who I replied to.
The test he describes is about trade dress, but trade dress isn't the issue here, what's being upheld is a design patent - something entirely non-dependant on public perception.
"So, I think the same thing of the music industry. They can't say that they're losing money, you know what I'm saying. They just probably don't have the same surplus that they had." -- Wu-Tang Clan founder RZA
Judge Posner Dismisses Apple-Motorola Case Again, Blasts Apple
June 25, 2012, 1:44 PM
Apple Plays Wile E. Coyote, Sees Galaxy S III Ban Attempt Foiled
June 13, 2012, 1:43 PM
Samsung Sues Aussie Patent Office; Prospect of U.S. Galaxy S III Ban Grow
June 8, 2012, 3:23 PM
Apple's Case Against Motorola/Google Dismissed "With Prejudice"
June 8, 2012, 11:00 AM
Samsung and Apple Abandon Talks, Commit to Total "Nuclear" War
May 24, 2012, 3:02 PM
BlackBerry Passport, Q5, and Z30 Go on Sale Till Dec. 30, Z30 is Nearly Sold Out
December 26, 2014, 4:04 PM
Despite Bump to $99/Year, Amazon Prime Attracts 10 Million New Customers
December 26, 2014, 3:08 PM
Qualcomm Snapdragon 810, New Gobi Modem Pass Cat. 9 LTE-A Test on UK's EE
December 25, 2014, 11:30 PM
Happy Holidays From DailyTech!!
December 24, 2014, 5:07 PM
Nokia's Sweet $250 Android Lollipop N1 Tablet is Rumored for Jan. 7 China Launch
December 24, 2014, 1:45 PM
Samsung Preps 4 GB LPDDR4 RAM to Power "4K" Smartphones in 2015
December 23, 2014, 10:38 AM
Most Popular Articles
Miyamoto: Nintendo is Prepping Successor to Troubled Wii U
December 22, 2014, 6:28 PM
Amazon's Kindle Fire HDX 8.9 Drops to $299 (30 Percent Off) for a Day
December 22, 2014, 10:57 AM
Android-Powered BLU Studio 7.0 Claims to be the "World's Largest Smartphone"
December 19, 2014, 2:40 PM
Airbus A350 XWB Passenger Jet Takes Off, First Unit Delivered to Qatar Airlines
December 22, 2014, 1:22 PM
Mississippi AG Drops Anti-Google Subpoena After Dirty MPAA Ties Are Revealed
December 22, 2014, 9:51 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information