Judge Posner Dismisses Apple-Motorola Case Again, Blasts Apple
June 25, 2012 1:44 PM
comment(s) - last by
Judge took issue with Apple's refusal to assign a reasonable licensing value to patents
Apple, Inc. (
) had a dream. In its dream it no longer had to compete with Google Inc.'s (
). Instead it
resorted to "thermonuclear war"
with Android, gaining sales bans and suing Android device makers with damage claims so exorbitant that licensing was a non-option.
But it's looking increasingly like Apple's dream is but a fantasy, as the U.S. federal court system, like its peers, are growing tired of the company's legal crusade.
I. Great Expectations for Apple
Judge Richard A. Posner
Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals
judge who moonlighted in the
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois
(Chicago), tossed Apple and Motorola Mobility's (a Google Inc. (
suits/countersuits out of court
"with prejudice" during the first week of June. He was upset about both companies' refusal to place realistic evaluations of their patents' worth (both companies reportedly lofted astronomical figures).
It was Motorola who originally initiated this suit, but it was essentially just committing to a preemptive strike after CEO Steve Jobs and Apple lawyers verbally threatened to sue it in late 2010. During the month of October 2010 Motorola dropped the hammer and
Apple followed in suit
with its promised infringement lawsuit.
The legal war was waged in Chicago court. [Image Source: Flickr/
By 2011, Apple was growing eager with anticipation. Motorola was facing scrutiny, as its lawsuit was founded on
fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) standards patents
. Motorola's decision to sue using FRAND IP had already provoked
complaints from Apple and Microsoft
By contrast, Apple's patents were non-FRAND and carried fewer licensing restrictions.
Apple perceived this as an opportunity to demand essentially infinite damages, leading to
a complete ban on current handset models
and forcing Motorola,
to scrap key features that seemingly overlapped with Apple's massive software patent portfolio. Paid critics of Google,
such as Florian Mueller
, eagerly salivated at Android's impending doom after it was "neutered" by Apple patent lawsuits.
Motorola's lawyers fought fire with fire, also requesting massive damages, despite realizing that their patents FRAND status made those damages even more risky.
II. Case Dismissed, Again
In the end Judge Posner rebuked both companies for this approach, dismissing the case. The dismissal was a blow to Google's defense efforts, but was a far bigger blow to Apple's offensive efforts. For that reason it was Apple who petitioned Judge Posner to reconsider, pleading for additional hearings to present revised arguments.
But those hearings came and went and Judge Posner has yet again dismissed the case with stinging words for Apple.
He comments in his ruling, "No more can Apple be permitted to force a trial in federal court the sole outcome of which would be an award of $1."
Judge Richard Posner was not happy with Apple. [Image Source: Abel Uribe, Chicago Tribune]
There would be no injunctions he added -- for either side. They would simply have to compete on the free market, seeing as they could not be reasonable with their requests in court.
He comments, "Both parties have deep pockets. And neither has acknowledged that damages for the infringement of its patents could not be estimated with tolerable certainty."
III. Begrudging Apple Forced to Compete
Apple has seen its anti-Android legal blitzkrieg sputter to a crawl in recent months. HTC Corp. (
implemented a workaround
its handsets to skirt
based on "data-tapping" -- converting phone numbers or addresses to actionable links.
efforts to ban
Samsung Electronics Comp., Ltd.'s (
Galaxy S III
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
(San Jose/San Francisco).
Judge Lucy Koh
, like Judge Posner, admonished Apple's zealous legal team. She accused them of trying to monopolize her time, commenting, "I cannot be a [full time] Apple v. Samsung judge."
In the Chicago Motorola case part of Judge Posner's frustration stemmed from the fact that Apple
complained at virtually every single stage
-- even after he had
handed them apparent victories
. Apple now is stuck between a rock and a hard place, as if it tries to appeal the ruling, the appeal will likely go to the same circuit appeals court that Judge Posner sits on.
Motorola's Razr MAXX will face no sales bans. [Image Source: Verizon Wireless]
The failure of its lawsuits is a very dangerous dilemma for Apple. A sales ban could help preserve Apple's strong position amid a period where it has made no bold or decisive moves.
death of Steve Jobs
in 2011, Apple's iPhones have seen slipping release schedules. The iPhone 4S did not land
until October 2011
, while this year's
sixth generation model
has yet to be even announced. This slippage stands in contrast to the reign of Jobs in which an iPhone was announced like clockwork each June and launched by late June (with the exception of the iPhone 3GS which launched in early July).
Likewise, after bold steps in terms of interface in early builds, Apple has since stalled.
suffered from bugs
in test builds and lags behind
Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich
Windows Phone 8
in GUI design. Apple is trying to spin its lack of refinements as sticking with "simplicity", but amid these attractive competitors it's looking increasingly demure and dated.
Product progress at Apple has slowed following the passing of Apple CEO/co-founder Steve Jobs
David Paul Morris/Getty Images
In short, the trainwreck of its legal efforts against Android couldn't come at a worse possible time for the iPhone's market hopes.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: What Jason did not say....
6/25/2012 2:52:24 PM
The end result is a good one, for both sides. Stop overvaluing and suing over these vague patents. The end result will get you no-where.
RE: What Jason did not say....
6/25/2012 3:05:59 PM
Agreed. This needed to happen, although I don't think the shit's going back in the horse at this point.
“We do believe we have a moral responsibility to keep porn off the iPhone.” -- Steve Jobs
Microsoft Announces Windows Phone 8, Won't Support Current Handsets
June 20, 2012, 12:35 PM
Quick Note: Apple's Maps App Flunks at Geography, Navigation
June 13, 2012, 3:53 PM
Apple Plays Wile E. Coyote, Sees Galaxy S III Ban Attempt Foiled
June 13, 2012, 1:43 PM
WWDC: Apple Announces iOS 6, Shows Off In-house Maps App
June 11, 2012, 2:45 PM
Samsung Sues Aussie Patent Office; Prospect of U.S. Galaxy S III Ban Grow
June 8, 2012, 3:23 PM
Smart Security Cameras: 5 Good Choices For Any Budget
July 25, 2016, 7:13 PM
Top 5 Smart Watches
July 21, 2016, 11:48 PM
Retiree Sues Apple For $7,500 for Wiping Honeymoon Photos From His iPhone
November 30, 2015, 10:23 AM
iPhone 7 May Pack 3-4 GB Memory, More Storage; 4-Inch Comeback is Rumored
November 20, 2015, 10:12 PM
OnePlus One, OnePlus 2 Will Receive Android Marshmallow in Q1 2016
November 16, 2015, 9:58 AM
Lenovo Whoa: Motorola Droid MAXX 2 and Turbo 2 Break Cover in Leaks
October 26, 2015, 3:12 PM
Most Popular Articles
2 NEW PlayStation 4 Models - Unveiling September 7th
August 23, 2016, 6:23 AM
iPhones May Get Curved Screens Next Year
August 24, 2016, 6:45 AM
Drones at the Airport
August 26, 2016, 5:00 AM
5 Easy Ways to Lower Blood Pressure By Monique C. Bethell, Ph.D.
August 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Say Goodbye to Data Plans - Sprint and T-Mobile offer Unlimited Data
August 22, 2016, 6:12 AM
Latest Blog Posts
First Self-Driving Car debut on the streets of Singapore
Aug 28, 2016, 4:10 PM
Coming Soon - Drones and Airports
Aug 24, 2016, 12:40 PM
SolarCity’s Gigafactory: A Milesone in Emerging Technology by Lily Emamian - 15 August 2016
Aug 15, 2016, 6:30 AM
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information