Website "Funny Junk" Steals The Oatmeal's Work, Sues Charities
June 23, 2012 1:59 PM
comment(s) - last by
(Source: The Oatmeal)
Supposedly "funny" site, can't take a joke, tries to block $210,000 donation to charity
A website called
has gained in popularity in recent years as a place for people to post random images they find on the internet. Its owners profit off ads placed to monetize their site's role as a repository of funny. The only problem is that many of the images posted (thousands) were web comics stolen (taken without permission) from hard-working artists' sites.
, a rather famous web-comic
took the site to task
, which led to
a frantic forums post
last year that somehow jumped to the conclusion that
artist Matt Inman was planning to sue. Subsequently an email/Facebook flame war erupted between fans of the two sites.
Then in a shocking twist
"lawyered up", hiring celebrity lawyer Charles Carreon. Mr. Carreon sent Mr. Inman
a legal threat demanding $20,000 USD
and an apology -- all for calling out
for its infrigement.
Matt Inman responded by founding a charity campaign entitled "
Bear Love Good
" and promising to give not a single red penny to Mr. Carreon, but $20,000 instead to charity. But he promised, "I'm going to take a photo of the raised money. I'm going to mail you that photo, along with this drawing of your mom seducing a Kodiak bear."
received a threat letter from
's lawyer. [Image Source: The Oatmeal]
Mr. Inman quickly collected the $20,000 used charity open community platform IndieGogo, with the proceeds going towards the American Cancer Society and the National Wildlife Federation.
's owners and Mr. Carreon. They filed a lawsuit against IndieGogo, Mr. Inman, the
American Cancer Society
, and the
National Wildlife Federation
, seeking to prevent the charity donations from going through. Mr. Carreon claims the charity was not properly registered with the state of California and should not be allowed to operate.
He also claims Mr. Inman defamed him and his clients, commenting, "I think satirical content is fine, but him accusing my mother of bestiality is revolting, and I will not forgive it."
But apparently Mr. Carreon thinks its okay to post crude, explicit Photoshop cartoons of George W. Bush and Condoleeza Rice
[NSFW]. He and his wife and posted this and several other images. And for the record, Mr. Inman never specified the ursine seduction to be sexual in nature, and for the record he says the picture was of the
administrator's mother, not Mr. Carreon's mother.
And Mr. Inman now has some high profile help defending himself from
and Mr. Carreon in
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
(San Francisco). The Electronic Frontier Foundation has
it will be joining Mr. Inman's lawyers.
and its lawyer are suing to try to deny the ACS $100,000 to try to cure cancer.
[Image Source: Stage Mom]
EFF Intellectual Property Director Corynne McSherry calls the lawsuit "bizarre" and comments, "This lawsuit is a blatant attempt to abuse the legal process to punish a critic. We're very glad to help Mr. Inman fight back."
This type of lawsuit is commonly referred to as a strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP), according to the EFF, and is a well known censorship tactic.
As publicity for the case has exploded the charity's collections have soared to $210,000+ USD. A donate link can be found here.
/Mr. Inman urges his fans and readers to donate to charity if they're upset about the case, not take their rage out on
or Mr. Carreon.
Bear Love Good
The Oatmeal 
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Using HIS pics without HIS permission
6/25/2012 3:36:47 PM
But if the content was not there would people still visit the hosting website to either read or post the infringed work, which generates income from advertising due to the page views of those reading or posting said content?
If this content does attract viewers and posters then it is being "used" to bring income to the hosting site.
RE: Using HIS pics without HIS permission
6/26/2012 9:23:55 AM
The advertising to me is the issue, as that means they profited from the copyrighted material. I am no legal expert, however that may give the copywrite holders a legal edge.
"There's no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance." -- Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer
Twitter Senior VP: "Diversity is Important, But We Can’t Lower the Bar"
November 9, 2015, 9:59 AM
CNN Resorts to Internet Censorship to Promote Clinton Over Senator Sanders
October 15, 2015, 2:47 PM
Breaking Bad: How to Crash Google's Chrome Browser With Just 8 Characters
September 23, 2015, 11:08 AM
Quick Note: Amazon UK Offers £10 Back on Any Order £50 or Over
August 3, 2015, 12:05 PM
Editorial: Reddit Allows Itself to be Hijacked as a Hate Platform For Racist Bigots
July 21, 2015, 6:32 PM
Mozilla and Facebook to Adobe: It's Time to Kill Flash
July 20, 2015, 6:30 PM
Most Popular Articles
iPhones May Get Curved Screens Next Year
August 24, 2016, 6:45 AM
Drones at the Airport
August 26, 2016, 5:00 AM
First Apple Computer Auctions for $815,000
August 27, 2016, 7:51 AM
5 Easy Ways to Lower Blood Pressure By Monique C. Bethell, Ph.D.
August 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
2 NEW PlayStation 4 Models - Unveiling September 7th
August 23, 2016, 6:23 AM
Latest Blog Posts
First Self-Driving Car debut on the streets of Singapore
Aug 28, 2016, 4:10 PM
Coming Soon - Drones and Airports
Aug 24, 2016, 12:40 PM
SolarCity’s Gigafactory: A Milesone in Emerging Technology by Lily Emamian - 15 August 2016
Aug 15, 2016, 6:30 AM
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information