TWC Prevents DVR Commercial Skipping with New Patent
June 22, 2012 3:30 AM
comment(s) - last by
The new patent aims to disable the fast-forward function as well as the "Look Back" and "Start Over" features in programs that are saved on the physical DVR
Time Warner Cable (TWC) patented a technique for digital video recorders (DVRs) that may prevent viewers from
The new patent aims to disable the fast-forward function as well as the "Look Back" and "Start Over" features in programs that are saved on the physical DVR. This would apply to network-based DVR and physical DVRs in subscriber homes.
"Look Back" allows TWC subscribers to access a program within three days of the premiere date if they forgot to record it, and "Start Over" allows the user to restart a show already in progress.
The reason for the new patent? Advertising. TWC worries that advertisers won't pony up the dough for advertisements if subscribers are just skipping them to get to their movie or TV show anyway.
"The ability to prevent trick mode functionality may be important for a number of reasons. Advertisers may not be willing to pay as much to place advertisements if they know that users may fast forward through the advertisement and thus not receive the desired sales message," said TWC in the patent. "Content providers may not be willing to grant rights in their content, or may want to charge more, if trick modes are permitted."
The patent may be difficult to uphold with DVRs that aren't controlled by the operator, but the multiple system operator (MSO) can stop subscribers from skipping commercials in cable shows they record using other devices.
TWC might have some issues with this new patent because subscribers will likely just go to other services like Verizon and DirecTV for DVRs that allow them to skip commercials.
Just last month, it was reported that Fox, CBS and NBC were
taking Dish Network to court
over a new feature that allows subscribers to skip advertisements. Dish ended up filing a suit to make ad-skipping acceptable with an official judgement.
The topic has raised much debate, where advertisers and TV broadcasters are looking for better methods of monetizing their content as more subscribers use DVRs.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
6/22/2012 10:11:29 AM
You're not stealing a damn thing. All you are doing is recording a show and watching it later. It's complete nonsense that you can't fast forward or go back.
Besides, most of their ad revenue is from sporting events (especially NFL). Most people don't record to watch it later and fast forward. People sit and watch it live with commercials.
This is just another futile attempt to avoid the full digitizing of television and movies because they have some ignorant belief that their profits will plummet five skillion bajillion dollars.
6/22/2012 4:29:16 PM
I'm not talking about with a DVR. Of course you're not stealing anything when you use your DVR to record anything. I'm talking about people download shows and movies off the internet using things like Bittorent. It's a copyrighted work that you didn't pay for and now have. Now yes there are legal ways to record TV shows with video capture cards and what not. I'm all for them.
I'm just solely talking about those who go online and download them illegally. And those who think they somehow have an inherent right to.
And yes stations won't make new shows if there's no revenue from ads. That's why certain shows get canceled. Enough people aren't watching, meaning what they can charge for ads is lower, meaning they may not be able to cover the production costs of the show and make a profit.
I can't wait for a-la-cart programming myself. I'm currently without cable or satellite. Just Netfix and an HD antenna. Now I will have to sign back up during football season since not everything is on networks or ESPN3. I am going to get Sunday Ticket through my PS3 without a DirecTV subscription though. Going to largely play it by ear.
But acting like you're forced to pay for cable or satellite is retarded. No. You value it enough to want to pay for it despite the high cost. Same goes for cell phones. We have no inherent right for to these services though.
"We don't know how to make a $500 computer that's not a piece of junk." -- Apple CEO Steve Jobs
Dish Network In Trouble Over Ad-Skipping DVR
May 25, 2012, 4:06 AM
Report: AT&T Eyeing $40B DirecTV Purchase
May 1, 2014, 8:00 AM
WebOS Class Action Settlement Costs HP $57 Million
April 1, 2014, 10:22 AM
IBM Workers Strike Over Terms of Deal That Will Have Them Working for Lenovo
March 6, 2014, 9:29 AM
Google Picking Up Artificial Intelligence Company "DeepMind" for $400 Million
January 27, 2014, 9:25 AM
Quick Note: Qualcomm Grabs up Palm, IPAQ, and Bitfone Patent Portfolio from HP
January 24, 2014, 9:18 AM
Verizon Buys Intel Media OnCue Cloud TV assets
January 21, 2014, 10:26 AM
Most Popular Articles
HTC Preps Nexus 9 With Nvidia K1 64-Bit "Denver" SoC, Android L Onboard
September 10, 2014, 10:21 PM
Dell Announces "World's Thinnest" Tablet: The Venue 8 7000 Series
September 11, 2014, 8:51 AM
Apple iPhone 6, iPhone 6 Plus Reviews Roll In
September 16, 2014, 9:13 PM
Samsung Calls Out “Copycat” Apple for 5.5” iPhone 6 Plus in New Ads
September 14, 2014, 11:06 PM
Confirmed: Next Generation of Windows to Be Announced on September 30
September 15, 2014, 4:43 PM
Latest Blog Posts
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
Space Terrorism is a Looming Threat For the United States
Apr 23, 2014, 7:47 PM
Facebook Aims to Provide Internet to "Every Person in the World" with Drones, Satellites
Apr 1, 2014, 10:20 AM
Retail Mobile Sites Experience Outages in Light of Simplexity's Bankruptcy
Mar 14, 2014, 8:48 AM
Tesla vs. BMW: Who Has the Safer EV?
Feb 1, 2014, 2:56 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information