Print 104 comment(s) - last by BluntForceTram.. on Jun 26 at 7:55 PM

The fight over E15 is not over yet

The Environmental Protection Agency has given the approval for retailers to sell 15% ethanol blended fuel. The fuel we purchase at most gas stations around the country today already has 10% ethanol mixed in. The EPA and other supporters of the plan have wanted to add an additional 5% ethanol to the fuel mix for cars built after 2001.
"Today, the last significant federal hurdle has been cleared to allow consumers to buy fuel containing up to 15 percent ethanol (E15)," said Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack. "This gets us one step closer to giving the American consumer a real choice at the pump. The public has a right to choose between imported oil and home-grown energy and today’s action by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) advances that goal."
The goal of the plan is to help reduce the dependence on foreign oil by using ethanol derived from corn.
“In the eyes of the federal government, E15 is a legal fuel for sale to cars, pickups, and SUVs made since 2001,” said RFA President and CEO Bob Dinneen. “With all i’s dotted and t’s crossed as far as EPA is concerned, our undivided focus will turn to addressing state regulatory issues, identifying retailers wishing to offer E15, and paving the way to greater use of domestically produced ethanol."
There are still other issues that have to be overcome before E15 makes it to pumps. These issues include pending litigation and threats from Washington. The U.S. House of Representatives has previously threatened to block the EPA's plans to force E15 sales at stations around the country. Many still argue that the use of E15 could cause millions of dollars in damage to engines in vehicles around the country.
One of the organizations opposing the rollout of E15 is the Outdoor Power Equipment Institute or OPEI. According to OPEI, government tests show that E15 is harmful to outdoor power equipment, boats, marine engines, and other non-road engine products. Adding an additional option at the pump could confuse consumers leading to misfueling and damage of engines according to OPEI.
"For the first time in American history, fuel used for some automobiles may no longer safe for any non-road products. It may, in fact, destroy or damage generators, chain saws, utility vehicles, lawn mowers, boats and marine engines, snowmobiles, motorcycles, ATVs, and more," says Kris Kiser, President and CEO of the Outdoor Power Equipment Institute, one of the industry groups who have been sending warnings to the federal government about E15.
Keiser added, "[The] EPA purports to educate tens of millions of Americans using hundreds of millions of engine products, asserting it will educate these users with a 3 inch by 3 inch pump label. It's frighteningly inadequate."
Some major automakers also argue E15 could harm engines in cars and trucks as well.

Sources: Autoblog, Wisconsin Ag Connection

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: at least we don't have corn subsidies anymore
By name99 on 6/19/2012 2:38:23 PM , Rating: 3
I wish we could get this level of intrusive government in other areas that the liberals hate, like micromanaging people on welfare.

And in this comment we see why America has such broken politics.

]You do realize that the group you call liberals, for the most part hate ethanol as much as or more than you do?
It is agricultural interests (both large agriculture and small farms) that support this stuff --- good Republican constituencies both of them.

RE: at least we don't have corn subsidies anymore
By ebakke on 6/19/12, Rating: 0
RE: at least we don't have corn subsidies anymore
By name99 on 6/19/2012 9:38:13 PM , Rating: 3
I have no idea WTF you are trying to say.
It is no secret that farmers vote Republican. A recent example:

summary: Almost 75 percent of farmers and ranchers intend to vote for a Republican as president

RE: at least we don't have corn subsidies anymore
By ebakke on 6/19/2012 10:14:59 PM , Rating: 2
Farmers, just like everyone else, vote for those who will continue to give them a handout. My point is that this has historically been a bipartisan affair.

By name99 on 6/19/2012 11:47:16 PM , Rating: 2
And historically the Republican party was the pro-African-American party.
This is interesting history but of little relevance to understanding today's politics.

"Intel is investing heavily (think gazillions of dollars and bazillions of engineering man hours) in resources to create an Intel host controllers spec in order to speed time to market of the USB 3.0 technology." -- Intel blogger Nick Knupffer

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki