backtop


Print 25 comment(s) - last by Belard.. on Jun 22 at 8:59 AM

Company is first Android tablet maker to call it quits post-Surface, will "focus on smartphones"

Finally profitable South Korean gadget-maker LG Electronics Inc. (KSC:066570) was eyeing a deeper charge into the tablet market.  But in the wake of Microsoft Corp.'s (MSFTannouncement of the "Surface", a 10.6-inch super-slick Windows 8 tablet, LG decided the time was not right for deeper market penetration.

I. Bye Bye Tablet Market, Says LG


Ken Hong, a spokesman for Seoul-based LG, commented in an email to Bloomberg, "We’ve decided to put all new tablet development on the back burner for the time being in order to focus on smartphones."

LG currently has a minimal presence in the tablet market -- the market for large touch-screen devices that tread the line between a smartphone and a traditional personal computer.  Last March LG launched its first tablet, the Optimus Pad, which was marketed as the "G-Slate" on Deutsche Telekom's (ETR:DTE) T-Mobile USA network.  That dual-core Honeycomb tablet was followed up on by the announcement of the Optimus Pad LTE earlier this year, but that tablet has yet to ship.
Optimus Pad LTE
The Optimus Pad LTE will likely be LG's last tablet for now. [Image Source: LG]

The tablet market is expected to reach $78.7B USD this year, but Android tablet makers like LG have struggled against market leader Apple, Inc. (AAPL).  So far the company that has made the most progress is Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) whose $200 USD Kindle Fire runs a branched variant of Android that Amazon designs in-house.

The big problem facing the Android pack is price.  None of them can match Amazon's attractive $200 price.  For example the G-Slate debuted at $529 USD, before eventually falling to $399 -- twice the price of a Kindle Fire.  Those prices put it in the same ballpark as Apple's iPad, which starts at $499.  But thus far Android tablet makers have failed to convince tablet consumers that their product is worth as much as an iPad.

Microsoft's arrival on the scene has sent further waves of fear through the huddled ranks of Android manufacturers.  While its tablets will likely be priced at higher than an iPad (one estimate we've been hearing is $900 USD for the Intel Corp. (INTCIvy Bridge model), they pack a full-fledged PC-operating system and a keyboard that looks far nicer than bare-bones wired and wireless keyboards for Android tablets.

They also have a colorful and striking design flare that easily outshines the more demure Android designs like the G-Slate, a substantive design that arguably outdoes Apple at its own game.

In short, it's increasingly looking like Apple and Microsoft will dominate the high-end, while quasi-Android tablet-maker Amazon will sweep up on the low end.  The rest of Windows 8 and Android third party crowd are left with a less certain fate trying to sell less-distinctive devices at middle-of-the-road price points.

II. Company Faces Challenges in the Smartphone Sector

LG's focus on its phone offerings is needed.  Apple recently passed it in unit sales, a testament to the twilight of the feature phone -- a market that LG long performed well in.  That's not necessarily bad news for LG.  It's turning a profit, and smartphone can be a much higher margin business than feature phones.  

But competition is very fierce in the smartphone market right now.  Windows Phone maker Nokia Oyj. (HEX:NOK1V) has started to gain ground.  Apple continues to accelerate its iPhone sales.  And Samsung Electronics Comp., Ltd. (KSC:005930) has consolidated its market share into a world-leading Android smartphone empire.  With LG positioned similarly to other scrappy challengers like HTC Corp. (TPE:2498) the demand to execute in terms of product launches has never been higher for the electronics firm.

LG Optimus Vu
LG's Optimus Vu is an impressive 5-inch Android smartphone. [Image Source: LG]

LG's Optimus line has started to gain some brand recognition in the U.S.  But it has a long ways to go before it becomes as well known as, say, Samsung's Galaxy line of smartphones.

Source: Bloomberg



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Response from public
By kleinma on 6/19/2012 1:44:16 PM , Rating: 4
LG used to make decent phones in the feature phone day, but I have not been impressed with their smartphones, tablets, or other devices.

LG might have the tagline of "Life's Good", but that is because no one would buy products from a company called "Lucky Goldstar" as it sounds like some cheaply made asian crap being churned out in sweatshop factories.

I bought an LG branded dehumidifier and the thing died on me just over a year. The replacement one I have is a GE that my parents gave me when they moved, which is 20 years old and still going strong.

LG wants you to think it is a high end company, but the reality is that it is a cheap crap electronics company.


RE: Response from public
By cknobman on 6/19/2012 2:24:37 PM , Rating: 2
Every single phone I have ever bought by LG has turned out to be sh!t.

That includes 1 android smartphone and 3 feature phones.

Response from me "Good, stop making other sh!t mobile products while your at it!".


RE: Response from public
By JasonMick (blog) on 6/19/2012 3:06:49 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
Every single phone I have ever bought by LG has turned out to be sh!t.

That includes 1 android smartphone and 3 feature phones.
I take it you like pain??

Weren't the first two awful phones enough?

Or did you hold out hope that a company originally named "Lucky-Goldstar" would suddenly produce terrific product?

;)

Honestly, though I hope LG does well in the phone market. More competition means more options and more new features -- which is a win no matter what platform you choose.


RE: Response from public
By cknobman on 6/19/2012 3:52:52 PM , Rating: 2
LOL

Actually I spent an entire upgrade cycle for my family of 4 on LG phones and it was a huge mistake.

2 of the 3 feature phones had random shutdown problems and the other had a problem with its ringer.

The Android phone was a optimus s and it has had a whole history of problems since day 1 (mostly software and firmware issues).


RE: Response from public
By chmilz on 6/19/2012 4:43:33 PM , Rating: 2
Bought a newer home Fall 2011. Previous owners installed upper-end LG appliances late 2009. Complete garbage. As soon as I have $5000 kicking around I'm replacing them all, except for the dishwasher - that piece will be dragged out back and receive the Office Space treatment.


RE: Response from public
By boobo on 6/19/2012 4:48:49 PM , Rating: 3
GE from 20 years ago != GE made today.


RE: Response from public
By Flunk on 6/19/2012 4:51:58 PM , Rating: 2
The only LG Phone I ever had was an LG Neon feature phone that loved to turn itself off when you slid the keyboard in (slider phone). This made it almost totally unusable. It also got terrible reception, the interface was poor and the build quality was suspect.

So, not all their feature phones were decent. My HTC HD7 that I'm using now is as solid as a rock and has never crashed on me. I would buy another HTC, another LG? No.


RE: Response from public
By TSS on 6/19/2012 6:40:43 PM , Rating: 2
That's not completly fair. Each company has it's own thing they're good at, and having something i'd call a general electronic device like a dehumidifier from a company called general electric... yeah.

I have an LG dumbphone, still goes strong after i've had it nearly a decade (i'm not so much into smartphones), with the battery still lasting multiple days on idle. The only thing that's "wrong" with it is that it's one of those flip open phones, and the flip resistance is completly gone. Otherwise it's survived a decade of falls, accidents and general use just fine.

Also have 3 LG screens which all work just great. One is a 56" HDTV, a normal 23" computer monitor and a 23" 3D monitor. The 1 year old 3D monitor does have 1 deadish pixel (it can't turn black anymore, just stays green then) and that's it (i suspect that to be due to the passive 3D technology's complexity - the other older 23" screen still works 100%). The TV and my HDTV decoder don't always get along either, but i suspect that's more due to the decoder then the TV.

The phone was a gift but i bought the screens because at the time, they where all the best quality for the price you got. Their main contenders are sony and samsung, and while i have an older 42" samsung TV as well which works just fine, their newer lines just aren't either as sharp or as colorfull as the LG screens. Even worse samsung often uses a glass plate instead of a matte screen which reflects light like crazy. In the store you can always see the samsung TV's from afar since you can clearly see the ceiling lights's reflection in them while all LG TV's just have a little yellowish blur. And they're ugly. Astethics doesn't matter much to me but i still noticed them to be quite tacky.

And Sony... well... Unless you go with the really expensive bravia's, their TV's are always worse in one aspect to the LG's. They use more power, have a lesser crisp image or the colours are less vivid, pick one. Also they tend to be more pricey even in the low segments.

So like with any company stick with what they know. Even though in today's world everything is built to fail a dehumidifier built by GE will still outlast one built by LG. Should GE ever enter the monitor/LCD market however, i'll just stick with my LG's.


"We’re Apple. We don’t wear suits. We don’t even own suits." -- Apple CEO Steve Jobs














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki