backtop


Print 127 comment(s) - last by johnsmith9875.. on Jun 29 at 10:40 AM

Change may be less extreme than some expected, but may leave some unhappy campers

You don't put desktop in the corner.

That sentiment is at the heart of much of Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) faithful’s increasing frustration with Windows 8.  Loyal Windows blogger Paul Thurrott went as far as to compare it to the much loathed Windows ME ("Millennium Edition").  Others have been more charitable, praising its strong touch support.  And manufacturers seem to be on board with Microsoft's message, at least, showing of a slew of hybrid notebooks and tablets [1][2][3].

When word leaked that Microsoft had snipped out the code that allowed the Start Menu to be re-enabled on the desktop via third-party hacks, many commenters flipped out and let their rage be known.  They weren't much happier when they heard that the Aero UI theme found in Windows Vista and Windows 7 desktops would be replaced by a Metro UI alternative.  (The current publicly available Release Preview retains the Aero UI theme.)

So how bad (or good) is the new Metro desktop makeover? Judge for yourself from these screenshots from WinUnleaked.

Windows 8 Metro Desktop

Windows 8 Metro UI Windows 8 Metro Desktop Windows 8 Metro Desktop Windows 8 Metro Desktop

Windows 8 Metro Desktop
(Click any image to enlarge) [Images Source: WindowsUnleaked]

While there's no real reason to doubt the authenticity of these shots, bear in mind that the leaked OS is a pre-RTM (release to manufacturing/marketing) build.  Even the poster "canouna" warns, "Please keep in mind this is not the FINAL theme."

Some people have already (for better or worse) drawn comparisons between the Metro theme and the Windows XP Water Color theme:

XP Water Color
 [Image Source: "The Rock"/WindowsUnleaked]

Of course, the bad news is that Microsoft appears to be locking the Desktop to Metro UI, though there's faint hope that it might leave in legacy code allowing transparency to be re-enabled.  Desktop Windows Manager (DWM) is still running on the test builds, but there's no telling if it will contain the Aero code any more.  Microsoft has stated before that Aero wastes battery life and consumes extra processing power versus the cleaner Metro UI, so that may be justification in Microsoft's mind for the switch.

As far as further changes to the desktop, the top two rumors are that Microsoft may complete the Metro makeover with new Metro-styled icons.  A second rumor is that the Office-esque "Ribbon" will be added to more of the menus, as this was the case in certain early builds.

So what do you think?  Is the Metro desktop in its current form a stud or a dud?

Source: WindowsUnleaked



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Looks like...
By B3an on 6/14/2012 3:28:45 PM , Rating: 2
BS.

I have two 30" 2560x600 monitors and find Win 8 superior for multitasking and multi-monitor setups.

It has better multi-monitor support for a start. You can now finally have a different taskbar on each monitor, and set the wallpaper to scale across all monitors or have a seperate wallpaper on each.

Multi-tasking is basically the same as Win 7 so i question whether you've actually used 8 at all. If anything it's easier though because i can now use multiple taskbars.

Theres also tons of little improvments. Now when i delete a file or shortcut i no longer get an annoying pop up window saying "Are you sure you want to send this to the recycle bin?" It just DELETES it immediately!

The Ribbon added to Windows Explorer also helps. I can customise what Ribbon tasks i want displayed along the top window bar (Quick Access Toolbar), so i dont even have to have the Ribbon expanded. I also like the new File menu added to Explorer. And tasks from this menu can be also added to the Quick Access Toolbar so they're just one click away.

Another nice little thing is when i import photos or video from a camera/phone, Windows will now correctly display the thumbnail images in the correct rotation. On Win 7 and older many thumbnail images were displayed sideways because the OS didn't support image/video orientation data. So even this saves time because i dont have to open up images/video in separate software to actually view them in the correct rotation.

Theres loads more stuff i could mention but i'd be here for ages... but the best thing is just that Win 8 is simply faster than 7. At pretty much everything, while managing to use less RAM.


RE: Looks like...
By croc on 6/15/2012 1:24:29 AM , Rating: 2
"30" 2560x600" Kind a funny shape for monitors... Do you run them in a sort-of-like SLI mode or something? Half of a document on the top one, the other on the bottom one...?

Or is this just a 'big brag' gone a bit curly?


RE: Looks like...
By mmarianbv on 6/15/2012 10:06:35 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
Theres also tons of little improvments. Now when i delete a file or shortcut i no longer get an annoying pop up window saying "Are you sure you want to send this to the recycle bin?" It just DELETES it immediately!


omg, and i had to click on a check box in windows 7 to do that.


"A politician stumbles over himself... Then they pick it out. They edit it. He runs the clip, and then he makes a funny face, and the whole audience has a Pavlovian response." -- Joe Scarborough on John Stewart over Jim Cramer














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki