Report: DOJ Opens Probe Into Cable Companies' Discrimination of Net Video
June 13, 2012 5:05 PM
comment(s) - last by
Comcast has reportedly turned its back on promises not to data discriminate
Internet video has a problem. Many of America's top cable providers -- such as Time Warner Cable, Inc. (
) and Comcast Corp. (
) -- also happen to be cable television providers. The last thing they want is people ditching cable TV for cable internet video, which hits them with a double whammy of extra bandwidth demands and less subscriber revenue.
I. Are Cable Companies Violating Their Promises?
According to a report in
Wall Street Journal
, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has initiated a probe into concerns that Comcast and others are working to quash internet video. It's talked to Hulu and Netflix, Inc. (NFLX), leading net-video providers as well.
The DOJ probe could have major impact if the department decides that antitrust violations have occurred. The government agency has made waves in recent months
AT&T, Inc.'s (
of Deutsche Telekom's (
) T-Mobile USA and by
, Inc. (
) and top e-book publishers for price fixing.
Among the decisions that triggered the new probe was Comcast's decision to offer free data to
customers who use its Xfinity app
on Microsoft Corp.'s (
) Xbox 360 console. Both Netflix and Hulu's apps count towards users'
capped data limits
, but the ISP's own app does not.
Comcast has been accused of data discrimination by rivals. [Image Source: Zachary Kaufman]
The issue is complicated by the fact that some major internet video providers are actually owned by the same companies looking to
. For example, while Comcast's decision may damage Hulu, Comcast is also a major owner of Hulu, along with News Corp. (
Comcast is treading on thin ice as it promised in 2011 to treat competitors' data the same as its own, as part of its purchase settlement with the DOJ regarding its
purchase of NBCUniversal
. Now it appears to be forgetting its promises.
II. Channel Providers Pressured Into Bundling
The DOJ is also examining the "fairness" of contracts that cable providers push channel providers into. One practice under investigation is cable providers' efforts to block channel providers from individualling selling a channel, instead forcing them to opt into authentication schemes.
In other words, ESPN might want to offer to sell you its channel for $2.50 a month with open access, but cable companies have currently nixed that option. The cable companies instead force you to buy their TV packages, which run $30 USD per month or more, in order to gain access. Only customers who authenticate themselves as cable subscribers can then access ESPN on mobile devices.
Cable providers have fought to only allow mobile channel access to authenticated bundled cable subscribers. [Image Source: Howard Forums]
At a Tuesday Senate hearing, Attorney General Eric Holder let it be known where his sympathies lie. When
Sen. Al Franken
(D., Minn.) suggested that some customers wanted to ditch cable and watch internet video instead, the Attorney General remarked, "I would be one of those consumers"
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
Time Warner/Road Runner definately guilty
6/13/2012 9:55:27 PM
I can only hope the fines are significant as I pay plenty for TW/RR and every now and then they are defiantly throttling me. I pay for a 30meg connection and sometimes have problems getting good quality from Netflix which shouldn't be a problem. I can prove they do it because I can access a friends WiFi on a different provider at half the speed and get a better video quality. If I call to complain to a high end tech it magically works for a few months without any problems then it starts up again.
RE: Time Warner/Road Runner definately guilty
6/14/2012 2:41:20 PM
No fines, because those fines will just get passed along to the consumers. What the outcome really needs to be is strong and rock solid net neutrality rules that if broken you lose your right to provide broadband.
"Paying an extra $500 for a computer in this environment -- same piece of hardware -- paying $500 more to get a logo on it? I think that's a more challenging proposition for the average person than it used to be." -- Steve Ballmer
Netflix CEO Rants About Comcast's Xfinity, Net Neutrality on Facebook
April 16, 2012, 12:18 PM
Apple Sued by U.S. Gov't, Won't Even Dignify it With a Public Response
April 11, 2012, 4:50 PM
Study: Netflix, Hulu Subscriber Sign-Ups to Decrease Throughout 2012/2013
April 5, 2012, 1:37 PM
AT&T Tucks Its Tail Between Its Legs, Abandons T-Mobile Acquisition
December 19, 2011, 4:50 PM
AT&T to Buy T-Mobile for $39 Billion USD
March 20, 2011, 2:52 PM
Twitter Senior VP: "Diversity is Important, But We Can’t Lower the Bar"
November 9, 2015, 9:59 AM
CNN Resorts to Internet Censorship to Promote Clinton Over Senator Sanders
October 15, 2015, 2:47 PM
Breaking Bad: How to Crash Google's Chrome Browser With Just 8 Characters
September 23, 2015, 11:08 AM
Quick Note: Amazon UK Offers £10 Back on Any Order £50 or Over
August 3, 2015, 12:05 PM
Editorial: Reddit Allows Itself to be Hijacked as a Hate Platform For Racist Bigots
July 21, 2015, 6:32 PM
Mozilla and Facebook to Adobe: It's Time to Kill Flash
July 20, 2015, 6:30 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information